Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population-Based Epidemiologic Analysis of Acute Pyelonephritis

Czaja, C. A., Scholes, D., Hooton, T. M., Stamm, W. E.·2007·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute pyelonephritis is a potentially severe disease for which there are few population-based studies. We performed a population-based analysis of trends in the incidence, microbial etiology, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial therapy of outpatient and inpatient pyelonephritis. METHODS: A total of 4887 enrollees of Group Health Cooperative, based in Seattle, Washington, who received an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis from 1997 through 2001 were identified using computerized records. Diagnoses were linked to urine culture and antibiotic prescription data. Case patients (n=3236) included subjects who had received an inpatient or culture-confirmed outpatient diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis. RESULTS: Among the female population, annual rates of outpatient and inpatient pyelonephritis were 12-13 cases per 10,000 population and 3-4 cases per 10,000 population, respectively; among the male population, the rates were 2-3 cases per 10,000 population and 1-2 cases per 10,000 population, respectively. Rates were relatively stable from year to year. Incidence was highest among young women, followed by infants and the elderly population. The ratio of outpatient to inpatient cases was highest among young women (ranging from 5 : 1 to 6 : 1). Escherichia coli caused 80% of cases of acute pyelonephritis in women and 70% of cases in men and was less dominant in older age groups. Among E. coli strains, the rate of ciprofloxacin resistance increased from 0.2% of isolates to 1.5% of isolates (P=.03), and the rate of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance decreased from 25% of isolates to 13% of isolates (P<.01) from 1997 to 2001. Among outpatient cases, the rate of fluoroquinolone use increased from 35% to 61%, whereas the rate of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use decreased from 53% to 32% over the 5-year period (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive, population-based analysis adds to our limited knowledge of the epidemiology of acute pyelonephritis, especially among outpatients, in whom the majority of cases now occur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/519268

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Czaja, C. A., Scholes, D., Hooton, T. M., & Stamm, W. E.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
273-280
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2086215708
Cited by
337
References
32
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population-Based Epidemiologic Analysis of Acute Pyelonephritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/519268
The paper
Czaja, C. A., Scholes, D., Hooton, T. M., & Stamm, W. E. (2007). Population-Based Epidemiologic Analysis of Acute Pyelonephritis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/519268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.