The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos and Their Substructure
Open accessAbstract
We use the "Via Lactea" simulation to study the co-evolution of a Milky Way-sized ΛCDM halo and its subhalo population. While most of the host halo mass is accreted over the first 6 Gyr in a series of major mergers, the physical mass distribution [not M vir ( z )] remains practically constant since z = 1. The same is true in a large sample of ΛCDM galaxy halos. Subhalo mass loss peaks between the turnaround and virialization epochs of a given mass shell, and the abundance of substructure within the shell freezes afterward. Of the z = 1 subhalos, 97% have a surviving bound remnant at the present epoch. The retained mass fraction is larger for initially lighter subhalos: today satellites with maximum circular velocities V max = 10 km s -1 at z = 1 have about 40% of the mass they had back then. At the first pericenter passage a larger average mass fraction is lost than during each following orbit. Tides remove mass in the substructure from the outside in, leading to higher concentrations compared to field halos of the same mass. This effect, combined with the earlier formation epoch of the inner satellites, results in strongly increasing subhalo concentrations toward the Galactic center. We present individual evolutionary tracks and present-day properties of the likely hosts of the dwarf satellites around the Milky Way. The formation histories of "field halos" that lie beyond the Via Lactea host today are found to strongly depend on the density of their environment. This is caused by tidal mass loss that affects many field halos on eccentric orbits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Cited by
The Aquarius Project: the subhaloes of galactic haloes
Springel, V., Wang, J., Vogelsberger, M., Ludlow, A., Jenkins, A., Helmi, A., Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14066.x · Cited by 1,889
Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Formation of supermassive black holes
Volonteri, M. (2010) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x · Cited by 783
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Diemand, J., Kuhlen, M., & Madau, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 667
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 859-877
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2094136845
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos and Their Substructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/520573
- The paper
- Diemand, J., Kuhlen, M., & Madau, P. (2007). Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos and Their Substructure. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/520573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.