Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Constraints on the Lyman Continuum Escape Fraction at z ∼ 1.3

Open access
Siana, Brian, Teplitz, Harry I., Colbert, James, Ferguson, Henry C., Dickinson, Mark, Brown, Thomas M., Conselice, Christopher J., de Mello, Duilia F., Gardner, Jonathan P., Giavalisco, Mauro, Menanteau, Felipe·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We examine deep far-UV (1600 Å) imaging of the HDF-N and the HUDF to search for leaking Lyman continuum radiation from starburst galaxies at z ~ 1.3. There are 21 (primarily sub- L *) galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts between 1.1 < z < 1.5, and none are detected in the far-UV. We fit stellar population templates to the galaxies' optical/near-infrared SEDs to determine the starburst age and level of dust attenuation for each individual galaxy, giving a more accurate estimate of the intrinsic Lyman continuum ratio, f 1500 / f 700 , and allowing a conversion from f 700 to relative escape fraction ( f esc,rel ). We show that previous high-redshift studies may have underestimated the amplitude of the Lyman break, and thus the relative escape fraction, by a factor ~2. Once the starburst age and intergalactic H I absorption are accounted for, 18 galaxies in our sample have limits to the relative escape fraction, f esc,rel < 1.0 with some limits as low as f esc,rel < 0.10 and a stacked limit of f esc,rel < 0.08. This demonstrates, for the first time, that most sub- L * galaxies at this redshift do not have large escape fractions. When combined with a similar study of more luminous galaxies at the same redshift, we show that, if all star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1 have similar relative escape fractions, the value must be less than 0.14 (3 σ). We also show that less than 20% (3 σ) of star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1 have relative escape fractions near unity. These limits contrast with the large escape fractions found at z ~ 3 and suggest that the average escape fraction has decreased between z ~ 3 and z ~ 1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/521185

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Siana, B., Teplitz, H. I., Colbert, J., Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M., Brown, T. M., Conselice, C. J., de Mello, D. F., Gardner, J. P., Giavalisco, M., & Menanteau, F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-10-10
Volume
668
Issue
1
Pages
62-73
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2075183146
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Constraints on the Lyman Continuum Escape Fraction at z ∼ 1.3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/521185
The paper
Siana, B., Teplitz, H. I., Colbert, J., Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M., Brown, T. M., Conselice, C. J., de Mello, D. F., Gardner, J. P., Giavalisco, M., & Menanteau, F. (2007). New Constraints on the Lyman Continuum Escape Fraction at z ∼ 1.3. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/521185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.