The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species Richness and Evolutionary Niche Dynamics: A Spatial Pattern–Oriented Simulation Experiment
Abstract
Evolutionary processes underlying spatial patterns in species richness remain largely unexplored, and correlative studies lack the theoretical basis to explain these patterns in evolutionary terms. In this study, we develop a spatially explicit simulation model to evaluate, under a pattern-oriented modeling approach, whether evolutionary niche dynamics (the balance between niche conservatism and niche evolution processes) can provide a parsimonious explanation for patterns in species richness. We model the size, shape, and location of species' geographical ranges in a multivariate heterogeneous environmental landscape by simulating an evolutionary process in which environmental fluctuations create geographic range fragmentation, which, in turn, regulates speciation and extinction. We applied the model to the South American domain, adjusting parameters to maximize the correspondence between observed and predicted patterns in richness of about 3,000 bird species. Predicted spatial patterns, which closely resemble observed ones (r2=0.795), proved sensitive to niche dynamics processes. Our simulations allow evaluation of the roles of both evolutionary and ecological processes in explaining spatial patterns in species richness, revealing the enormous potential of the link between ecology and historical biogeography under integrated theoretical and methodological frameworks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems
Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01286 · Cited by 11,265
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Barve, N., Barve, V., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lira-Noriega, A., Maher, S. P., Peterson, A. T., Soberón, J., & Villalobos, F. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011 · Cited by 1,881
Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology
Wiens, J. J., Ackerly, D. D., Allen, A. P., Anacker, B. L., Buckley, L. B., Cornell, H. V., Damschen, E. I., Jonathan Davies, T., Grytnes, J., Harrison, S. P., et al. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x · Cited by 1,877
Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly
Stegen, J. C., Lin, X., Fredrickson, J. K., & Konopka, A. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00370 · Cited by 936
Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche
Colwell, R. K., & Rangel, T. F. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901650106 · Cited by 769
Self-citationA phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity
Donoghue, M. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801962105 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Rangel, T. F. L. V. B., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F., & Colwell, R. K.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 602-616
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1992325342
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species Richness and Evolutionary Niche Dynamics: A Spatial Pattern–Oriented Simulation Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/521315
- The paper
- Rangel, T. F. L. V. B., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F., & Colwell, R. K. (2007). Species Richness and Evolutionary Niche Dynamics: A Spatial Pattern–Oriented Simulation Experiment. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/521315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.