Cited by 107Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Halo Star Streams in the Solar Neighborhood

Open access
Kepley, Amanda A., Morrison, Heather L., Helmi, Amina, Kinman, T. D., Van Duyne, Jeffrey, Martin, John C., Harding, Paul, Norris, John E. +1 more·2007·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We have assembled a sample of halo stars in the solar neighborhood to look for halo substructure in velocity and angular momentum space. Our sample (231 stars) includes red giants, RR Lyrae variable stars, and red horizontal branch stars within 2.5 kpc of the Sun with [Fe/H] less than -1.0. It was chosen to include stars with accurate distances, space velocities, and metallicities, as well as well-quantified errors. With our data set, we confirm the existence of the streams found by Helmi and coworkers, which we refer to as the H99 streams. These streams have a double-peaked velocity distribution in the z -direction (out of the Galactic plane). We use the results of modeling of the H99 streams by Helmi and collaborators to test how one might use v z velocity information and radial velocity information to detect kinematic substructure in the halo. We find that detecting the H99 streams with radial velocities alone would require a large sample (e.g., approximately 150 stars within 2 kpc of the Sun and within 20° of the Galactic poles). In addition, we use the velocity distribution of the H99 streams to estimate their age. From our model of the progenitor of the H99 streams, we determine that it was accreted between 6 and 9 Gyr ago. The H99 streams have [α/Fe] abundances similar to other halo stars in the solar neighborhood, suggesting that the gas that formed these stars were enriched mostly by Type II supernovae. We have also discovered in angular momentum space two other possible substructures, which we refer to as the retrograde and prograde outliers. The retrograde outliers are likely to be halo substructure, but the prograde outliers are most likely part of the smooth halo. The retrograde outliers have significant structure in the v ϕ direction and show a range of [α/Fe], with two having low [α/Fe] for their [Fe/H]. The fraction of substructure stars in our sample is between 5% and 7%. The methods presented in this paper can be used to exploit the kinematic information present in future large databases like RAVE, SDSS-II/SEGUE, and Gaia .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/521429

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The time of infall of the Helmi streams progenitor estimated by Koppelman et al. (2019b) is between 5 and 8 Gyr ago.

    “The time of infall estimated by Koppelman et al. (2019b) is between 5 and 8 Gyr ago (see also Kepley et al. 2007) and it is largely driven by the asymmetry seen in the number of stars with positive and negative v z .”

    From Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way (2020) · cites this paper as Kepley et al. 2007

    Section 4.3.1 estimates the Helmi-stream progenitor’s accretion time from the asymmetry between stars with positive and negative v_z, so Kepley et al. support the basis of the citing sentence’s “see also” reference. Their reported estimate is 6–9 Gyr ago, however, not 5–8 Gyr ago; our copy cannot verify the estimate attributed to Koppelman et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Binney, J., & Merrifield, M. 1998, Galactic Astronomy (3rd ed.; Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press)
  2. Blaauw, A., & Schmidt, M. 1965, Galactic Structure (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press)
  3. White, S. D. M., & Springel, V. 2000, in The First Stars, ed. A. Weiss, T. G. Abel, & V. Hill ( Berlin: Springer), 327

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kepley, A. A., Morrison, H. L., Helmi, A., Kinman, T. D., Van Duyne, J., Martin, J. C., Harding, P., Norris, J. E., & Freeman, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Illinois at Springfield (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2007-08-24
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
1579-1595
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W1968676667
Cited by
107
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0098435)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Galactic halo substructure, kinematic substructure, stellar velocity distribution, radial velocity, alpha-element abundances, stellar accretion, solar neighborhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review