The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods
Abstract
This paper develops a framework for estimating household preferences for school and neighborhood attributes in the presence of sorting. It embeds a boundary discontinuity design in a heterogeneous residential choice model, addressing the endogeneity of school and neighborhood characteristics. The model is estimated using restricted‐access Census data from a large metropolitan area, yielding a number of new results. First, households are willing to pay less than 1 percent more in house prices—substantially lower than previous estimates—when the average performance of the local school increases by 5 percent. Second, much of the apparent willingness to pay for more educated and wealthier neighbors is explained by the correlation of these sociodemographic measures with unobserved neighborhood quality. Third, neighborhood race is not capitalized directly into housing prices; instead, the negative correlation of neighborhood percent black and housing prices is due entirely to the fact that blacks live in unobservably lower‐quality neighborhoods. Finally, there is considerable heterogeneity in preferences for schools and neighbors, with households preferring to self‐segregate on the basis of both race and education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Tiebout, C. M. (1956) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257839 · Cited by 13,222
Cited by
Regression discontinuity designs in economics
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281 · Cited by 4,534
Assessing the Incidence and Efficiency of a Prominent Place Based Policy
Busso, M., Gregory, J., & Kline, P. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.897 · Cited by 658
The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design*
Cellini, S. R., Ferreira, F., & Rothstein, J. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215 · Cited by 532
Self-citationThe Opportunity Atlas: Mapping the Childhood Roots of Social Mobility
Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Hendren, N., Jones, M., & Porter, S. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25147 · Cited by 532
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., & McMillan, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 588-638
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W3102009763
- Cited by
- 1,001
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 123.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/522381
- The paper
- Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., & McMillan, R. (2007). A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/522381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.