Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS

Open access
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Cobb, B. E., D'Avanzo, P., D'Elia, V., Della Valle, M., Ferrero, P., Fugazza, D., Gorosabel, J., Israel, G. L., Mannucci, F., Piranomonte, S., Schulze, S., Stella, L., Tagliaferri, G., Wiersema, K.·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been separated into two classes, originally along the lines of duration and spectral properties, called "short/hard" and "long/soft." The latter have been conclusively linked to the explosive deaths of massive stars, while the former are thought to result from the merger or collapse of compact objects. In recent years, indications have been accumulating that the short/hard versus long/soft division does not map directly onto what would be expected from the two classes of progenitors, leading to a new classification scheme called Type I and Type II which is based on multiple observational criteria. We use a large sample of GRB afterglow and prompt-emission data (adding further GRB afterglow observations in this work) to compare the optical afterglows (or the lack thereof) of Type I GRBs with those of Type II GRBs. In comparison to the afterglows of Type II GRBs, we find that those of Type I GRBs have a lower average luminosity and show an intrinsic spread of luminosities at least as wide. From late and deep upper limits on the optical transients, we establish limits on the maximum optical luminosity of any associated supernova (SN), confirming older works and adding new results. We use deep upper limits on Type I GRB optical afterglows to constrain the parameter space of possible mini-SN emission associated with a compact-object merger. Using the prompt-emission data, we search for correlations between the parameters of the prompt emission and the late optical afterglow luminosities. We find tentative correlations between the bolometric isotropic energy release and the optical afterglow luminosity at a fixed time after the trigger (positive), and between the host offset and the luminosity (negative), but no significant correlation between the isotropic energy release and the duration of the GRBs. We also discuss three anomalous GRBs, GRB 060505, GRB 060614, and GRB 060121, in light of their optical afterglow luminosities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Cobb, B. E., D'Avanzo, P., D'Elia, V., Della Valle, M., Ferrero, P., Fugazza, D., Gorosabel, J., Israel, G. L., Mannucci, F., Piranomonte, S., Schulze, S., Stella, L., Tagliaferri, G., & Wiersema, K.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
734
Issue
2
Pages
96
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2079140993
Cited by
276
References
194
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96
The paper
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Cobb, B. E., D'Avanzo, P., D'Elia, V., Della Valle, M., Ferrero, P., Fugazza, D., Gorosabel, J., Israel, G. L., Mannucci, F., . . . Wiersema, K. (2011). THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.