The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS
Open accessAbstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been separated into two classes, originally along the lines of duration and spectral properties, called "short/hard" and "long/soft." The latter have been conclusively linked to the explosive deaths of massive stars, while the former are thought to result from the merger or collapse of compact objects. In recent years, indications have been accumulating that the short/hard versus long/soft division does not map directly onto what would be expected from the two classes of progenitors, leading to a new classification scheme called Type I and Type II which is based on multiple observational criteria. We use a large sample of GRB afterglow and prompt-emission data (adding further GRB afterglow observations in this work) to compare the optical afterglows (or the lack thereof) of Type I GRBs with those of Type II GRBs. In comparison to the afterglows of Type II GRBs, we find that those of Type I GRBs have a lower average luminosity and show an intrinsic spread of luminosities at least as wide. From late and deep upper limits on the optical transients, we establish limits on the maximum optical luminosity of any associated supernova (SN), confirming older works and adding new results. We use deep upper limits on Type I GRB optical afterglows to constrain the parameter space of possible mini-SN emission associated with a compact-object merger. Using the prompt-emission data, we search for correlations between the parameters of the prompt emission and the late optical afterglow luminosities. We find tentative correlations between the bolometric isotropic energy release and the optical afterglow luminosity at a fixed time after the trigger (positive), and between the host offset and the luminosity (negative), but no significant correlation between the isotropic energy release and the duration of the GRBs. We also discuss three anomalous GRBs, GRB 060505, GRB 060614, and GRB 060121, in light of their optical afterglow luminosities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Swift Gamma‐Ray Burst Mission
Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., Mason, K. O., Nousek, J. A., Wells, A. A., White, N. E., Barthelmy, S. D., Burrows, D. N., Cominsky, L. R., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422091 · Cited by 4,154
Self-citationA two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay
Demorest, P. B., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S. M., Roberts, M. S. E., & Hessels, J. W. T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09466 · Cited by 3,905
Gamma-ray bursts from stellar mass accretion disks around black holes
Woosley, S. E. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/172359 · Cited by 2,554
Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311269 · Cited by 2,297
Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars
Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T., & Schramm, D. N. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340126a0 · Cited by 2,107
Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts
Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C. A., Fishman, G. J., Bhat, N. P., Briggs, M. S., Koshut, T. M., Paciesas, W. S., & Pendleton, G. N. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/186969 · Cited by 2,028
An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998
Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., Kouveliotou, C., Augusteijn, T., Böhnhardt, H., Brewer, J. P., Doublier, V., Gonzalez, J.-F., Leibundgut, B., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27150 · Cited by 1,921
Filippenko, A. V. (1997) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 · Cited by 1,824
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationBauswein, A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/1/78 · Cited by 567
Fong, W., Berger, E., Margutti, R., & Zauderer, B. A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/102 · Cited by 532
A complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Cobb, B. E., D'Avanzo, P., D'Elia, V., Della Valle, M., Ferrero, P., Fugazza, D., Gorosabel, J., Israel, G. L., Mannucci, F., Piranomonte, S., Schulze, S., Stella, L., Tagliaferri, G., & Wiersema, K.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 734
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2079140993
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 194
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96
- The paper
- Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Cobb, B. E., D'Avanzo, P., D'Elia, V., Della Valle, M., Ferrero, P., Fugazza, D., Gorosabel, J., Israel, G. L., Mannucci, F., . . . Wiersema, K. (2011). THE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.