The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolutionary Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction: Evidence from the Ecological Distribution of Asexual Reproduction in Clonal Plants
Abstract
In theory, females that reproduce asexually should enjoy a twofold advantage in fitness over sexual females, yet sex remains the predominant mode of reproduction in virtually all eukaryotes. The evolutionary maintenance of sex is especially puzzling in clonal plants because the transition from sexual to exclusively asexual reproduction is an ever‐present possibility in these species. In this article, I use published data on the genotypic diversity of populations of clonal plants to test five hypotheses about the ecological situations that limit or favor clonal reproduction in vascular plants. The data were drawn from 248 studies covering 69,000 individuals in >2000 populations of 218 species in 74 plant families. The tests showed the following: (1) the frequency of clonality increases with population age, indicating that clonal reproduction is limited by disturbance; (2) clonal reproduction is limited by dispersal; clones are more frequent in aquatic and apomictic species in which the dispersal of clonally produced propagules is less limiting; (3) clones are more frequent in populations of rare or endangered species; (4) populations of alien plants have higher frequencies of clonality; and (5) clones are more frequent at the edges of species’ geographical ranges. Thus, it appears that the ultimately successful clonal plant would be a rare, aquatic, alien apomict living in an undisturbed, geographically marginal habitat. Since this combination of circumstances is so restrictive, it is perhaps better regarded as a sign of sexual failure than as a recipe for clonal success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williams, G. C. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 2,177
genotype and genodive : two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms
MEIRMANS, P. G., & VAN TIENDEREN, P. H. (2004) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00770.x · Cited by 1,796
Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them
Spielman, D., Brook, B. W., & Frankham, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403809101 · Cited by 1,251
Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice
Bender, E. A., Case, T. J., & Gilpin, M. E. (1984) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939452 · Cited by 1,245
Colonization, Succession and Stability.
Barkham, J. P., Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J., & Edwards, P. J. (1988) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2260584 · Cited by 1,105
Predictors of Species Sensitivity to Fragmentation
Henle, K., Davies, K. F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C., & Settele, J. (2004) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000004319.91643.9e · Cited by 1,032
How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation?
LEIMU, R., MUTIKAINEN, P., KORICHEVA, J., & FISCHER, M. (2006) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01150.x · Cited by 904
Rabinowitz, D. A. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 855
Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination
Otto, S. P., & Lenormand, T. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg761 · Cited by 821
The Population Genetics of Clonal and Partially Clonal Diploids
Balloux, F., Lehmann, L., & de Meeûs, T. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1635 · Cited by 585
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvertown, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-168
- ISSN
- 1058-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5315
- OpenAlex
- W2127863127
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolutionary Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction: Evidence from the Ecological Distribution of Asexual Reproduction in Clonal Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523357
- The paper
- Silvertown, J. (2008). The Evolutionary Maintenance of Sexual Reproduction: Evidence from the Ecological Distribution of Asexual Reproduction in Clonal Plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1086/523357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.