Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences

Igic, Boris, Lande, Russell, Kohn, Joshua R.·2008·International Journal of Plant Sciences

Abstract

We review and analyze the available literature on the frequency and distribution of self‐incompatibility (SI) among angiosperms and find that SI is reported in more than 100 families and occurs in an estimated 39% of species. SI frequently has been lost but rarely has been gained during angiosperm diversification, and there is no evidence that any particular system of SI, once lost, has been regained. Irreversible loss of SI systems is thought to occur because transitions to self‐compatibility (SC) are accompanied by collapse of variation at the S‐locus and by accumulation of loss‐of‐function mutations at multiple loci involved in the incompatibility response. The asymmetry in transitions implies either that SI is declining in frequency or that it provides a macroevolutionary advantage. We present a model in which the loss of SI is irreversible and species can be SI, SC but outcrossing, or predominantly selfing. Increased diversification rates of SI relative to SC taxa are required to maintain SI at equilibrium, while transition rates between states, together with state‐specific diversification rates, govern the frequency distribution of breeding‐system states. We review empirical studies about the causes and consequences of the loss of SI, paying particular attention to the model systems Arabidopsis and Solanum sect. Lycopersicon. In both groups, losses of SI have been recent and were accompanied by loss of most or all of the functional variation at the S‐locus. Multiple loss‐of‐function mutations are commonly found. Some evidence indicates that mutations causing SC strongly increase the selfing rate and that SC species have lower genetic diversity than their SI relatives, perhaps causing an increase in the extinction rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/523362

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 66 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Igic, B., Lande, R., & Kohn, J. R.
Venue
International Journal of Plant Sciences
Published
2008-01
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
93-104
ISSN
  • 1058-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5315
OpenAlex
W2077373321
Cited by
466
References
66
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523362
The paper
Igic, B., Lande, R., & Kohn, J. R. (2008). Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences. International Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1086/523362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.