The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recombinant gp350 Vaccine for Infectious Mononucleosis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of an Epstein‐Barr Virus Vaccine in Healthy Young Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: To date, there is no commercially available vaccine to prevent infectious mononucleosis, a disease frequently induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in adolescents or adults devoid of preexisting immunity to the virus. METHODS: A total of 181 EBV-seronegative, healthy, young adult volunteers were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or a recombinant EBV subunit glycoprotein 350 (gp350)/aluminum hydroxide and 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (AS04) candidate vaccine in a 3-dose regimen. RESULTS: The vaccine had demonstrable efficacy (mean efficacy rate, 78.0% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.0%-96.0%]) in preventing the development of infectious mononucleosis induced by EBV infection, but it had no efficacy in preventing asymptomatic EBV infection. One month after receipt of the final dose of gp350 vaccine, 98.7% of subjects showed seroconversion to anti-gp350 antibodies (95% CI, 85.5%-97.9%), and they remained anti-gp350 antibody positive for >18 months. Furthermore, there were no concerns regarding the safety or reactogenicity of the gp350/AS04 vaccine. CONCLUSION: These data support the clinical feasibility of using an EBV vaccine to prevent infectious mononucleosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00430534.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Luzuriaga, K., & Sullivan, J. L. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1001116 · Cited by 606
GlaxoSmithKline Adjuvant Systems in vaccines: concepts, achievements and perspectives
Garçon, N., Chomez, P., & Van Mechelen, M. (2007) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.6.5.723 · Cited by 476
Latency and lytic replication in Epstein–Barr virus-associated oncogenesis
Münz, C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0249-7 · Cited by 469
Progress and Problems in Understanding and Managing Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infections
Odumade, O. A., Hogquist, K. A., & Balfour, H. H. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00044-10 · Cited by 458
Epstein-Barr Virus: An Important Vaccine Target for Cancer Prevention
Cohen, J. I., Fauci, A. S., Varmus, H., & Nabel, G. J. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002878 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Sokal, E. M., Hoppenbrouwers, K., Vandermeulen, C., Moutschen, M., Léonard, P., Moreels, A., Haumont, M., Bollen, A., Smets, F., & Denis, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12-15
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1749-1753
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2154933177
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinant gp350 Vaccine for Infectious Mononucleosis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of an Epstein‐Barr Virus Vaccine in Healthy Young Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523813
- The paper
- Sokal, E. M., Hoppenbrouwers, K., Vandermeulen, C., Moutschen, M., Léonard, P., Moreels, A., Haumont, M., Bollen, A., Smets, F., & Denis, M. (2007). Recombinant gp350 Vaccine for Infectious Mononucleosis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of an Epstein‐Barr Virus Vaccine in Healthy Young Adults. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/523813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.