The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Freshly Formed Dust in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant as Revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope
Open accessAbstract
We performed Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph mapping observations covering nearly the entire extent of the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant (SNR), producing mid-infrared (5.5-35 μm) spectra every 5 '' -10 '' . Gas lines of Ar, Ne, O, Si, S, and Fe, and dust continua were strong for most positions. We identify three distinct ejecta dust populations based on their continuum shapes. The dominant dust continuum shape exhibits a strong peak at 21 μm. A line-free map of 21 μm peak dust made from the 19-23 μm range closely resembles the [Ar II], [O IV], and [Ne II] ejecta-line maps, implying that dust is freshly formed in the ejecta. Spectral fitting implies the presence of SiO 2 , Mg protosilicates, and FeO grains in these regions. The second dust type exhibits a rising continuum up to 21 μm and then flattens thereafter. This "weak 21 μm" dust is likely composed of Al 2 O 3 and C grains. The third dust continuum shape is featureless with a gently rising spectrum and is likely composed of MgSiO 3 and either Al 2 O 3 or Fe grains. Using the least massive composition for each of the three dust classes yields a total mass of 0.020 M ☉ . Using the most massive composition yields a total mass of 0.054 M ☉ . The primary uncertainty in the total dust mass stems from the selection of the dust composition necessary for fitting the featureless dust as well as 70 μm flux. The freshly formed dust mass derived from Cas A is sufficient from SNe to explain the lower limit on the dust masses in high-redshift galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Rho, J., Kozasa, T., Reach, W. T., Smith, J. D., Rudnick, L., DeLaney, T., Ennis, J. A., Gomez, H., & Tappe, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-01-20
- Volume
- 673
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 271-282
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2093830760
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Freshly Formed Dust in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant as Revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523835
- The paper
- Rho, J., Kozasa, T., Reach, W. T., Smith, J. D., Rudnick, L., DeLaney, T., Ennis, J. A., Gomez, H., & Tappe, A. (2008). Freshly Formed Dust in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant as Revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/523835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.