Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Greater Tenofovir‐Associated Renal Function Decline with Protease Inhibitor–Based versus Nonnucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor–Based Therapy

Open access
Goicoechea, Miguel, Liu, Shanshan, Best, Brookie, Sun, Shelly, Jain, Sonia, Kemper, Carol, Witt, Mallory, Diamond, Catherine, Haubrich, Richard, Louie, Stan, California Collaborative Treatment Group 578 Team·2008·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plasma concentrations of tenofovir increase when the drug is coadministered with some ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r). We hypothesized that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-treated patients taking PI/r-based regimens would have a greater decline in renal function than patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based therapy. METHODS: We compared the estimated decline in renal function among 146 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients receiving a TDF+PI/r- (n = 51), TDF+NNRTI- (n = 29), or non-TDF-containing (n = 66) regimen. Plasma tenofovir concentrations were measured at study week 2, and rates of creatinine clearance (CrCl) were estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations. Mixed-effects models were used to analyze regimen type and tenofovir concentration as predictors of change in CrCl from baseline to weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: Decreases in C-G estimates of CrCl were not significantly different among the 3 groups during the first 24 weeks of therapy. However, in adjusted analyses, patients receiving TDF+PI/r had a greater rate of decline in CrCl than did the TDF+NNRTI group (for C-G, -13.9 vs. -6.2 mL/min/year [P = .03]; for MDRD, -14.7 vs. -4.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/year [P = .02]). Among TDF-treated patients, tenofovir plasma concentration was not associated with CrCl over time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with TDF and PI/r was associated with greater declines in renal function over 48 weeks compared with TDF+NNRTI-based regimens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/524061

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Goicoechea, M., Liu, S., Best, B., Sun, S., Jain, S., Kemper, C., Witt, M., Diamond, C., Haubrich, R., Louie, S., & California Collaborative Treatment Group 578 Team
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-01
Volume
197
Issue
1
Pages
102-108
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2142982724
Cited by
299
References
22
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Greater Tenofovir‐Associated Renal Function Decline with Protease Inhibitor–Based versus Nonnucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor–Based Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/524061
The paper
Goicoechea, M., Liu, S., Best, B., Sun, S., Jain, S., Kemper, C., Witt, M., Diamond, C., Haubrich, R., Louie, S., & California Collaborative Treatment Group 578 Team. (2008). Greater Tenofovir‐Associated Renal Function Decline with Protease Inhibitor–Based versus Nonnucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor–Based Therapy. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/524061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.