Terra rossa genesis, implications for karst, and eolian dust: A geodynamic thread
Abstract
Although terra rossa has long been thought to form by residual dissolution of limestone and/or by accumulation of detrital mud, ash, or dust on preexisting karst limestones, we present conclusive new field and petrographic evidence that terra rossa forms by replacement of limestone by authigenic clay at a moving metasomatic front several centimeters wide. The red clay’s major chemical elements, Al, Fe, and Si, probably come from dissolved eolian dust. The replacement of calcite by clay exhibits a serrated, microstylolitic texture that helps prove that replacement happens not by dissolution‐precipitation, as conventional wisdom has it, but by pressure solution of calcite driven by the crystallization stress generated by the growth of clay crystals. The acid produced by the isovolumetric replacement of limestone by clay quickly dissolves out additional porosity/permeability in an adjacent slice of limestone within the front, triggering a reactive‐infiltration instability that should, theoretically, convert the moving reaction front into a set of wormholes, then funnels, then sinks—the very karst morphology that in nature does contain the terra rossa itself. This beautifully explains why terra rossa and karst are associated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The large porosity created by limestone dissolution via reaction (1) in each slice should trigger the reactive infiltration instability.
“The large porosity created by limestone dissolution via reaction (1) in each slice should trigger the reactive infiltration instability, first identified and modeled by Chadam and others (1986) and Ortoleva and others (1987b) and proposed recently to generate the funnels and sinkholes characteristic of karst (Merino and Banerjee, 2008).”
From Self-accelerating dolomite-for-calcite replacement: Self-organized dynamics of burial dolomitization and associated mineralization (2011) · cites this paper as Merino and Banerjee, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Merino, E., & Canals, A. (2011) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/07.2011.01 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Merino, E., & Banerjee, A.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Geology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-75
- ISSN
- 0022-1376 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5269
- OpenAlex
- W1977380062
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Geology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- terra rossa, karst, aeolian dust, authigenic clay minerals, limestone replacement, pressure solution, calcite dissolution, karst sinkholes, wormholes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review