CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Virology and Viral DiseasesBacterial Infections and VaccinesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mumps Vaccine Performance among University Students during a Mumps Outbreak

Cortese, Margaret M., Jordan, Hannah T., Curns, Aaron T., Quinlan, Patricia A., Ens, Kim A., Denning, Patricia M., Dayan, Gustavo H.·2008·Clinical Infectious Diseases
DOI 10.1086/529141
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The largest reported mumps outbreak at a US college in 19 years occurred in 2006 at a Kansas university with a 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination policy. We assessed vaccine performance and mumps risk factors, including the possibility of waning vaccine protection. METHODS: Case students were compared with a cohort of the university's approximately 19,000 undergraduates. The secondary attack rate for clinical mumps was determined among roommates exposed to case students. Time from receipt of the second dose of MMR vaccine was compared between case students and roommates without mumps. RESULTS: Coverage with > or =2 dose of MMR vaccine was > or =95% among 140 undergraduate case students and 444 cohort students. The secondary attack rate for clinical mumps among roommates who had received 2 doses of vaccine ranged from 2.2% to 7.7%, depending on the case definition. Compared with roommates without mumps, case students were more likely (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-4.82) to have received their second dose of MMR vaccine > or =10 years earlier. The odds of being a case student increased with each 1-year increase in time from receipt of the second dose of MMR vaccine (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.68) among case students and roommates aged 18-19 years but not among those aged > or =20 years. Students aged 18-19 years had a higher risk of mumps (risk ratio, 3.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-6.16), compared with students aged > or =22 years; women living in dormitories had increased risk of mumps (risk ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.76), compared with men not living in dormitories. CONCLUSION: High 2-dose MMR coverage protected many students from developing mumps but was not sufficient to prevent the mumps outbreak. Vaccine-induced protection may wane. Similar US settings where large numbers of young adults from wild-type naive cohorts live closely together may be at particular risk for mumps outbreaks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/529141

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. McNabb SJ, 2007, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 54, 1
  2. Centers, 1982, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 31, 617
  3. Watson JC, 1998, MMWR Recomm Rep, 47, 1
  4. Centers, 1989, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 38, 388
  5. Centers, 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 55, 1152
  6. Centers, 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 55, 559
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mumps epidemic-Iowa, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55:366-8.
  8. Centers, 1997, MMWR Recomm Rep, 46, 1
  9. Mumps, 2006, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 464
  10. Cochi SL, 1988, Am J Dis Child, 142, 499
  11. Cohen C, 2007, England. Emerg Infect Dis, 13, 12
  12. Meyer MB, 1962, Am J Hyg, 75, 259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 125

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cortese, M. M., Jordan, H. T., Curns, A. T., Quinlan, P. A., Ens, K. A., Denning, P. M., & Dayan, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
1172-1180
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
DOI
10.1086/529141
OpenAlex
W2148035675
Cited by
125
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
mumps, mumps vaccine, MMR vaccine, vaccine waning, vaccination coverage, mumps outbreak, university students, secondary attack rate, dormitory life, young adults, risk factors
MeSH terms
Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Kansas, Male, Mumps, Mumps Vaccine, Students, Universities, Cohort Studies, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review