The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Presentation of Nipah Virus Infection in Bangladesh
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Bangladesh, 4 outbreaks of Nipah virus infection were identified during the period 2001-2004. METHODS: We characterized the clinical features of Nipah virus-infected individuals affected by these outbreaks. We classified patients as having confirmed cases of Nipah virus infection if they had antibodies reactive with Nipah virus antigen. Patients were considered to have probable cases of Nipah virus infection if they had symptoms consistent with Nipah virus infection during the same time and in the same community as patients with confirmed cases. RESULTS: We identified 92 patients with Nipah virus infection, 67 (73%) of whom died. Although all age groups were affected, 2 outbreaks principally affected young persons (median age, 12 years); 62% of the affected persons were male. Fever, altered mental status, headache, cough, respiratory difficulty, vomiting, and convulsions were the most common signs and symptoms; clinical and radiographic features of acute respiratory distress syndrome of Nipah illness were identified during the fourth outbreak. Among those who died, death occurred a median of 6 days (range, 2-36 days) after the onset of illness. Patients who died were more likely than survivors to have a temperature >37.8 degrees C, altered mental status, difficulty breathing, and abnormal plantar reflexes. Among patients with Nipah virus infection who had well-defined exposure to another patient infected with Nipah virus, the median incubation period was 9 days (range, 6-11 days). CONCLUSIONS: Nipah virus infection produced rapidly progressive severe illness affecting the central nervous and respiratory systems. Clinical characteristics of Nipah virus infection in Bangladesh, including a severe respiratory component, appear distinct from clinical characteristics reported during earlier outbreaks in other countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nipah Virus: Past Outbreaks and Future Containment
Soman Pillai, V., Krishna, G., & Valiya Veettil, M. (2020) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v12040465 · Cited by 194
Rapid Nipah virus entry into the central nervous system of hamsters via the olfactory route
Munster, V. J., Prescott, J. B., Bushmaker, T., Long, D., Rosenke, R., Thomas, T., Scott, D., Fischer, E. R., Feldmann, H., & de Wit, E. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00736 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Hossain, M. J., Gurley, E. S., Montgomery, J. M., Bell, M., Carroll, D. S., Hsu, V. P., Formenty, P., Croisier, A., Bertherat, E., Faiz, M. A., Azad, A. K., Islam, R., Molla, M. A. R., Ksiazek, T. G., Rota, P. A., Comer, J. A., Rollin, P. E., Luby, S. P., & Breiman, R. F.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 977-984
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2154293331
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Presentation of Nipah Virus Infection in Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/529147
- The paper
- Hossain, M. J., Gurley, E. S., Montgomery, J. M., Bell, M., Carroll, D. S., Hsu, V. P., Formenty, P., Croisier, A., Bertherat, E., Faiz, M. A., Azad, A. K., Islam, R., Molla, M. A. R., Ksiazek, T. G., Rota, P. A., Comer, J. A., Rollin, P. E., Luby, S. P., & Breiman, R. F. (2008). Clinical Presentation of Nipah Virus Infection in Bangladesh. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/529147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.