Cited by 1Historical Gender and Feminism StudiesHistorical Education Studies WorldwideReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment

Reviews of Books:Bound by a Mighty Vow: Sisterhood and Women's Fraternities, 1870-1920 Diana B. Turk

Alpern, Sara·2005·The American Historical Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/531399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This definition of self in relation to men seems antithetical to mission statements highlighting value, independence, and cultivation of a female voice.

    “This definition of self in relation to men would seem antithetical to mission statements that highlight the value, independence, and cultivation of a female voice (Alpern, 2005).”
  • A focus on sorority women as preoccupied with looks and not concerned with academics dominated the published research.

    “A focus on sorority women as preoccupied with looks and not concerned with academics dominated the published research (Alpern, 2005;Bogart, Ryan, & Stefanov, 1999;Boyd, 1999).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Authors
Alpern, S.
Corresponding author
Alpern, Sara
Venue
The American Historical Review
Published
2005-04
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
505-506
ISSN
  • 0002-8762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-5239
OpenAlex
W2047381357
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2014: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Historical Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education Studies Worldwide
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Keywords
sororities, sisterhood, women's organizations, women's history, 19th century, early 20th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review