Constraints on the Self‐Interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simulations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657−56
Open accessAbstract
We compare recent results from X-ray, strong lensing, weak lensing, and optical observations with numerical simulations of the merging galaxy cluster 1E 0657–56. X-ray observations reveal a bullet-like subcluster with a prominent bow shock, which gives an estimate for the merger velocity of 4700 km s −1 , while lensing results show that the positions of the total mass peaks are consistent with the centroids of the collisionless galaxies (and inconsistent with the X-ray brightness peaks). Previous studies, based on older observational data sets, have placed upper limits on the self-interaction cross section of dark matter per unit mass, σ/ m , using simplified analytic techniques. In this work, we take advantage of new, higher quality observational data sets by running full N -body simulations of 1E 0657–56 that include the effects of self-interacting dark matter, and comparing the results with observations. Furthermore, the recent data allow for a new independent method of constraining σ/ m , based on the nonobservation of an offset between the bullet subcluster mass peak and galaxy centroid. This new method places an upper limit (68% confidence) of σ/ m < 1.25 cm 2 g −1 . If we make the assumption that the subcluster and the main cluster had equal mass-to-light ratios prior to the merger, we derive our most stringent constraint of σ/ m < 0.7 cm 2 g −1 , which comes from the consistency of the subcluster's observed mass-to-light ratio with the main cluster's, and with the universal cluster value, ruling out the possibility of a large fraction of dark matter particles being scattered away due to collisions. Our limit is a slight improvement over the previous result from analytic estimates, and rules out most of the 0.5-5 cm 2 g −1 range invoked to explain inconsistencies between the standard collisionless cold dark matter model and observations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infrequent interactions with large momentum transfer (as in hard scattering) can eject particles from the cluster and are potentially observable as a decrease in the mass-to-light ratio; Randall et al. (2008) used the Bullet Cluster to constrain these models with an upper limit of m_DM_s < 0.7 cm2/g (68% confidence).
“Infrequent interactions with large momentum transfer (as in hard scattering), in contrast, can eject particles from the cluster and are potentially observable as a decrease in the massto-light ratio; Randall et al. (2008) used the Bullet Cluster to constrain these models with an upper limit of m DM s <0.7 cm 2 g -1 (68% confidence).”
From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Randall et al. (2008)
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRandall et al. (2008) found the Bullet Cluster west mass to be 25 +/- 29 kpc to the east of the galaxies.
“Randall et al. (2008) explicitly analyzed the offset between galaxy and mass centroids and found the mass to be 25±29 to the east (for comparison, the H15 offset is just over 100 kpc to the northwest).”
From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Randall et al. (2008)
The H15 methodology does not yet support constraints tighter than the 1.25 cm2/g at 68% confidence quoted by Randall et al. (2008).
“In other words, the H15 methodology does not yet support constraints tighter than the 1.25 cm 2 g -1 at 68% confidence quoted by Randall et al. (2008).”
From The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters (2018) · cites this paper as Randall et al. (2008)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Clowe, D., Randall, S. W., & Markevitch, M. 2007, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 173, 28
- Markevitch, M. 2006, in Proceedings of The X-Ray Universe 2005, ed. A. Wilson ( ESA SP-604; Noordwijk: ESA), 723
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales
Weinberg, D. H., Bullock, J. S., Governato, F., Kuzio de Naray, R., & Peter, A. H. G. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308716112 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters
Wittman, D., Golovich, N., & Dawson, W. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee77 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Randall, S. W., Markevitch, M., Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A. H., & Bradač, M.
- Affiliations
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 679
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1173-1180
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2030737301
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Smithsonian Institution
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS8-39073)
- Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- self-interacting dark matter, dark matter self-interaction cross section, cluster mergers, bow shock, strong gravitational lensing, weak gravitational lensing, X-ray observations, N-body simulations, mass-to-light ratio, cold dark matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review