Cited by 27Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Near‐Field Microlensing from Wide‐Field Surveys

Open access
Han, Cheongho·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We estimate the rate of near-field microlensing events expected from all-sky surveys and investigate the properties of the events. Under the assumption that lenses are composed of stars, our estimation of the event rate ranges from Γ tot ∼ 0.1 yr −1 for a survey with a magnitude limit of V lim = 12 to Γ tot ∼ 23 yr −1 for a survey with V lim = 18. We find that the average distances to the source star and lens vary considerably depending on the magnitude limit, while the dependencies of the event timescale and lens-source transverse speed are weak. We also find that the average lens-source proper motion of events expected from a survey with V lim = 18 would be ⟨ μ ⟩ ≳ 40 mas yr −1 , and the value further increases as the magnitude limit becomes lower, implying that the source and lens of a significant fraction of near-field events can be resolved from high-resolution follow-up observations conducted several years after the lensing magnification. From the investigation of the variation of the event characteristics depending on the position of the sky, we find that the average distances to source stars and lenses become shorter, the lens-source transverse speed increases, and the timescale becomes shorter as the Galactic latitude of the field increases. Because of the concentration of events near the Galactic plane, we find that ≳50% of events would be detected in the field with b ⩽ 30°.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/588083

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allen, C. W. 1973, Astrophysical Quantities (3rd ed.; London: Athlone Press)
  2. Jahreiss, H., & Wielen, R. 1983, in IAU Colloq. 76, The Nearby Stars and Stellar Luminosity Function, ed. A. G. D. Philip & A. R. Upgren (Schenectady: L. Davis Press), 227

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, C.
Affiliations
Chungbuk National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Han, Cheongho
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-07-10
Volume
681
Issue
2
Pages
806-813
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1963749805
Cited by
27
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
microlensing event rate, wide-field sky survey, Galactic latitude dependence, Galactic plane, follow-up observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review