The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been recent reports of frequent treatment failure associated with the use of metronidazole for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. We tested the hypothesis that treatment failure with metronidazole is associated with a suboptimal microbiological response in comparison with that of vancomycin. METHODS: We conducted a 9-month prospective observational study of patients with C. difficile-associated disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare metronidazole-treated and vancomycin-treated patients in terms of time to resolution of diarrhea and time to reduction of C. difficile in stool to an undetectable level. RESULTS: Of 52 study patients with C. difficile-associated disease, 34 (65%) received initial therapy with oral metronidazole, and 18 (35%) received initial therapy with oral vancomycin. Diarrhea resolved in >90% of patients who completed 10 days of treatment with either agent. However, vancomycin-treated patients were more likely to develop undetectable levels of C. difficile (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-11.3;P = .009) and to have resolution of diarrhea (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.40;P = .005) during the first 5 days of therapy. Ten metronidazole-treated patients (29%) had their treatment changed to oral vancomycin because of persistent symptoms. Seven (70%) of these 10 patients had <1 log reduction in C.difficile concentration; however, only 4 had completed > or = 6 days of metronidazole treatment at the time of the treatment change. CONCLUSION: In an observational study with a limited number of subjects, a majority of patients with C. difficile-associated disease responded to therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin. Failure with metronidazole treatment may be attributable to a slower and less consistent microbiological response than that with oral vancomycin treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections
Surawicz, C. M., Brandt, L. J., Binion, D. G., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Curry, S. R., Gilligan, P. H., McFarland, L. V., Mellow, M., & Zuckerbraun, B. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4 · Cited by 1,645
van Prehn, J., Reigadas, E., Vogelzang, E. H., Bouza, E., Hristea, A., Guery, B., Krutova, M., Norén, T., Allerberger, F., Coia, J. E., et al. (2021) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038 · Cited by 640
Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile in Adults: A Systematic Review
Bagdasarian, N., Rao, K., & Malani, P. N. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.17103 · Cited by 451
Gao, X. W., Mubasher, M., Fang, C. Y., Reifer, C., & Miller, L. E. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.11 · Cited by 318
Sartelli, M., Di Bella, S., McFarland, L. V., Khanna, S., Furuya-Kanamori, L., Abuzeid, N., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Ansaloni, L., Augustin, G., Bala, M., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Al‐Nassir, W. N., Sethi, A. K., Nerandzic, M. M., Bobulsky, G. S., Jump, R. L. P., & Donskey, C. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2108424891
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/588293
- The paper
- Al‐Nassir, W. N., Sethi, A. K., Nerandzic, M. M., Bobulsky, G. S., Jump, R. L. P., & Donskey, C. J. (2008). Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/588293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.