Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin

Al‐Nassir, Wafa N., Sethi, Ajay K., Nerandzic, Michelle M., Bobulsky, Greg S., Jump, Robin L. P., Donskey, Curtis J.·2008·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been recent reports of frequent treatment failure associated with the use of metronidazole for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. We tested the hypothesis that treatment failure with metronidazole is associated with a suboptimal microbiological response in comparison with that of vancomycin. METHODS: We conducted a 9-month prospective observational study of patients with C. difficile-associated disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare metronidazole-treated and vancomycin-treated patients in terms of time to resolution of diarrhea and time to reduction of C. difficile in stool to an undetectable level. RESULTS: Of 52 study patients with C. difficile-associated disease, 34 (65%) received initial therapy with oral metronidazole, and 18 (35%) received initial therapy with oral vancomycin. Diarrhea resolved in >90% of patients who completed 10 days of treatment with either agent. However, vancomycin-treated patients were more likely to develop undetectable levels of C. difficile (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-11.3;P = .009) and to have resolution of diarrhea (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.40;P = .005) during the first 5 days of therapy. Ten metronidazole-treated patients (29%) had their treatment changed to oral vancomycin because of persistent symptoms. Seven (70%) of these 10 patients had <1 log reduction in C.difficile concentration; however, only 4 had completed > or = 6 days of metronidazole treatment at the time of the treatment change. CONCLUSION: In an observational study with a limited number of subjects, a majority of patients with C. difficile-associated disease responded to therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin. Failure with metronidazole treatment may be attributable to a slower and less consistent microbiological response than that with oral vancomycin treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/588293

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Al‐Nassir, W. N., Sethi, A. K., Nerandzic, M. M., Bobulsky, G. S., Jump, R. L. P., & Donskey, C. J.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-07
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
56-62
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2108424891
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/588293
The paper
Al‐Nassir, W. N., Sethi, A. K., Nerandzic, M. M., Bobulsky, G. S., Jump, R. L. P., & Donskey, C. J. (2008). Comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Response to Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease with Metronidazole and Vancomycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/588293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.