The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae Loads to Predict Bacterial Vaginosis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a poorly detected public health problem that is associated with preterm delivery and for which no reliable diagnostic tool exists. METHODS: Molecular analysis of 231 vaginal samples, classified by Gram stain-based Nugent score, was used to propose molecular criteria for BV; these criteria were prospectively applied to 56 new samples. A quantitative molecular tool targeting 8 BV-related microorganisms and a human gene was developed using a specific real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and serial dilutions of a plasmid suspension. The targeted microorganisms were Gardnerella vaginalis, Lactobacillus species, Mobiluncus curtisii, Mobiluncus mulieris, and Candida albicans (which can be identified by Gram staining), as well as Atopobium vaginae, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum (which cannot be detected by Gram staining). RESULTS: With use of the Nugent score, 167 samples were classified as normal, 20 were classified as BV, and 44 were classified as intermediate. Except for U. urealyticum, M. mulieris, and Lactobacillus species, DNA of the tested bacteria was detected more frequently in samples demonstrating BV, but the predictive value of such detection was low. The molecular quantification of A. vaginae (DNA level, > or = 10(8) copies/mL) and G. vaginalis (DNA level, > or = 10(9) copies/mL) had the highest predictive value for the diagnosis of BV, with excellent sensitivity (95%), specificity (99%), and positive (95%) and negative (99%) predictive values; 25 (57%) of the samples demonstrating intermediate flora had a BV profile. When applied prospectively, our molecular criteria had total positive and negative predictive values of 96% and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report a highly reproducible, quantitative tool to objectively analyze vaginal flora that uses cutoff values for the concentrations of A. vaginae and G. vaginalis to establish the molecular diagnosis of BV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,013
Nugent, R. P., Krohn, M. A., & Hillier, S. L. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991 · Cited by 3,331
Molecular Identification of Bacteria Associated with Bacterial Vaginosis
Fredricks, D. N., Fiedler, T. L., & Marrazzo, J. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043802 · Cited by 1,303
Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy
Brocklehurst, P., Gordon, A., Heatley, E., & Milan, S. J. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000262.pub4 · Cited by 616
Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid
Spiegel, C. A., Amsel, R., & Holmes, K. K. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.18.1.170-177.1983 · Cited by 412
Verhelst, R., Verstraelen, H., Claeys, G., Verschraegen, G., Delanghe, J., Van Simaey, L., De Ganck, C., Temmerman, M., & Vaneechoutte, M. (2004) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-4-16 · Cited by 348
Rapid Detection of Group B Streptococci in Pregnant Women at Delivery
Bergeron, M. G., Ke, D., Ménard, C., François, F. J., Gagnon, M., Bernier, M., Ouellette, M., Roy, P. H., Marcoux, S., & Fraser, W. D. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007203430303 · Cited by 294
Ison, C. A. (2002) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sti.78.6.413 · Cited by 241
Spiegel, C. A. (1991) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.4.4.485 · Cited by 240
Bradshaw, C. S., Tabrizi, S. N., Fairley, C. K., Morton, A. N., Rudland, E., & Garland, S. M. (2006) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/506621 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Armougom, F., Henry, M., Vialettes, B., Raccah, D., & Raoult, D. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007125 · Cited by 905
Self-citationRomero, R., Hassan, S. S., Gajer, P., Tarca, A. L., Fadrosh, D. W., Nikita, L., Galuppi, M., Lamont, R. F., Chaemsaithong, P., Miranda, J., et al. (2014) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4 · Cited by 852
Lamont, R., Sobel, J., Akins, R., Hassan, S., Chaiworapongsa, T., Kusanovic, J., & Romero, R. (2011) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x · Cited by 481
Influence of Biofilm Formation by Gardnerella vaginalis and Other Anaerobes on Bacterial Vaginosis
Machado, A., & Cerca, N. (2015) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv338 · Cited by 269
Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities
Redelinghuys, M. J., Geldenhuys, J., Jung, H., & Kock, M. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00354 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Menard, J., Fenollar, F., Henry, M., Bretelle, F., & Raoult, D.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-43
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2127098783
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae Loads to Predict Bacterial Vaginosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/588661
- The paper
- Menard, J., Fenollar, F., Henry, M., Bretelle, F., & Raoult, D. (2008). Molecular Quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae Loads to Predict Bacterial Vaginosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/588661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.