The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species
Abstract
Although sexual interactions between species (reproductive interference) have been reported from a wide range of animal taxa, their potential for determining species coexistence is often disregarded. Here, we review evidence from laboratory and field studies illustrating that heterospecific sexual interactions are frequently associated with fitness loss and can have severe ecological and evolutionary consequences. We define reproductive interference as any kind of interspecific interaction during the process of mate acquisition that adversely affects the fitness of at least one of the species involved and that is caused by incomplete species recognition. We distinguish seven types of reproductive interference: signal jamming, heterospecific rivalry, misdirected courtship, heterospecific mating attempts, erroneous female choice, heterospecific mating, and hybridization. We then discuss the sex-specific costs of these types and highlight two typical features of reproductive interference: density-dependence and asymmetry. Similar to competition, reproductive interference can lead to displacement of one species (sexual exclusion), spatial, temporal, or habitat segregation, changes in life history parameters, and reproductive character displacement. In many cases, patterns of coexistence might be shaped by reproductive interference rather than by resource competition, as the presence of a few heterospecifics might substantially decrease reproductive success. Therefore, interspecific sexual interactions should receive more attention in ecological research. Reproductive interference has mainly been discussed in the context of invasive species or hybrid zones, whereas its influence on naturally-occurring sympatric species pairs has rarely been addressed. To improve our knowledge of the ecological significance of reproductive interference, findings from laboratory experiments should be validated in the field. Future studies should also focus on ecological mechanisms, such as temporal spatial, or habitat partitioning, that might enable sexually interacting species to coexist. Reproductive interference also has implications for the management of endangered species, which can be threatened by sexual interactions with invasive or common species. Studies of reproductive interference might even provide new insights for biological pest control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems
Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01286 · Cited by 11,265
Darwin, C., Burndy Library, Darwin, C., Edmonds & Remnants, & Henry Sotheran Ltd. (1859) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.59991 · Cited by 6,984
Genetics and the Origin of Species
(1952) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.1093/aibsbulletin/2.2.14-b · Cited by 3,935
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control
Levins, R. (1969) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · Cited by 3,474
Barton, N. H., & Hewitt, G. M. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553 · Cited by 2,882
Principles of animal communication
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5059 · Cited by 2,529
EXTINCTION BY HYBRIDIZATION AND INTROGRESSION
Rhymer, J. M., & Simberloff, D. (1996) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83 · Cited by 2,426
The Evolution of insect mating systems
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.189072 · Cited by 2,337
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems
Briers, R. (2006) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01592.x · Cited by 2,130
Cited by
Character Displacement: Ecological And Reproductive Responses To A Common Evolutionary Problem
Pfennig, K. S., & Pfennig, D. W. (2009) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/605079 · Cited by 432
Same-sex sexual behavior in insects and arachnids: prevalence, causes, and consequences
Scharf, I., & Martin, O. Y. (2013) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1610-x · Cited by 98
Importance of the GluN2B carboxy-terminal domain for enhancement of social memories
Jacobs, S., Wei, W., Wang, D., & Tsien, J. Z. (2015) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.038521.115 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-282
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2126255000
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 22.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/590510
- The paper
- Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A. (2008). Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/590510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.