The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes
Open accessAbstract
When entrepreneurs enter structural holes in networks, they can exploit the related benefits. Evidence for these benefits has steadily accumulated. The authors ask whether those who strive for such structural advantages can maintain them if others follow their example. Burt speculates that they cannot, but a formal demonstration of this speculation is lacking. Using a game theoretic model of network formation, the authors characterize the networks that emerge when everyone strives for structural holes. They find that the predominant stable networks distribute benefits evenly, confirming that no one is able to maintain a structural advantage in the long run.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228943 · Cited by 26,975
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
COLEMAN, J. (2000) · Knowledge and Social Capital · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2 · Cited by 21,666
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Putnam, R. D. (1995) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 · Cited by 14,037
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Lazega, E., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3322456 · Cited by 7,853
(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n575 · Cited by 6,008
Cited by
The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0695 · Cited by 874
Social Network Analysis: Foundations and Frontiers on Advantage
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143828 · Cited by 707
Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150054 · Cited by 486
Structural holes in social networks
Goyal, S., & Vega-Redondo, F. (2007) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.006 · Cited by 364
Everton, S. F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136877 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Buskens, V., & van de Rijt, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-407
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2007567227
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/590674
- The paper
- Buskens, V., & van de Rijt, A. (2008). Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/590674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.