Improved Age Estimation for Solar‐Type Dwarfs Using Activity‐Rotation Diagnostics
Open accessAbstract
While the strong anticorrelation between chromospheric activity and age has led to the common use of the Ca II H and K emission index ( R ' HK = L HK / L bol ) as an empirical age estimator for solar-type dwarfs, existing activity-age relations produce implausible ages at both high and low activity levels. We have compiled R ' HK data from the literature for young stellar clusters, richly populating for the first time the young end of the activity-age relation. Combining the cluster activity data with modern cluster age estimates and analyzing the color dependence of the chromospheric activity age index, we derive an improved activity-age calibration for F7-K2 dwarfs (0.5 mag < B − V < 0.9 mag ). We also present a more fundamentally motivated activity-age calibration that relies on conversion of R ' HK values through the Rossby number to rotation periods and then makes use of improved gyrochronology relations. We demonstrate that our new activity-age calibration has typical age precision of ~0.2 dex for normal solar-type dwarfs aged between the Hyades and the Sun (~0.6-4.5 Gyr). Inferring ages through activity-rotation-age relations accounts for some color-dependent effects and systematically improves the age estimates (albeit only slightly). We demonstrate that coronal activity as measured through the fractional X-ray luminosity ( R X = L X / L bol ) has nearly the same age- and rotation-inferring capability as chromospheric activity measured through R ' HK . As a first application of our calibrations, we provide new activity-derived age estimates for a volume-limited sample of the 108 solar-type field dwarfs within 16 pc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 3.211-day periodicity of J1407 is consistent with rotational modulation of starspots typical for young active stars.
“(consistent with rotational modulation of starspots, typical for young active stars, e.g., Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008)”
From PLANETARY CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN OCCULTATION: DISCOVERY OF AN EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEM TRANSITING A YOUNG SUN-LIKE STAR AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR DETECTING ECLIPSES BY CIRCUMSECONDARY AND CIRCUMPLANETARY DISKS (2012) · cites this paper as Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 161 · Cited by 1,313
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [32]32. Baliunas, S. L., Donahue, R. A., Soon, W., & Henry, G. W. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 154, Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ed. R. A. Donahue & J. A. Bookbinder (San Francisco: ASP), 153
- [58]58. Donahue, R. A. 1993, Ph.D. Thesis, New Mexico State Univ.
- [59]59. ---. 1998, ASP Conf Ser. 154, The Tenth Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, ed. R. A. Donahue & J. A. Bookbinder (San Francisco: ASP), 1235
- [117]117. Meibom, S., Mathieu, R. D., & Stassun, K. G. 2008, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:0805.1040) · arXiv
- [143]143. B. Reipurth, in press Preibisch, T., & Zinnecker, H. 1999, AJ, 117, 2381
- Authors
- Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Mamajek, Eric E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2008-11-10
- Volume
- 687
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1264-1293
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2142350809
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 25.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Keywords
- stellar age estimation, chromospheric activity, young stellar clusters, gyrochronology, Rossby number, stellar rotation periods, coronal X-ray emission, color dependence, Hyades, field dwarfs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review