Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rickettsia parkeri Rickettsiosis and Its Clinical Distinction from Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Open access
Paddock, Christopher D., Finley, Richard W., Wright, Cynthia S., Robinson, Howard N., Schrodt, Barbara J., Lane, Carole C., Ekenna, Okechukwu, Blass, Mitchell A., Tamminga, Cynthia L., Ohl, Christopher A., McLellan, Susan L. F., Goddard, Jerome, Holman, Robert C., Openshaw, John J., Sumner, John W., Zaki, Sherif R., Eremeeva, Marina E.·2008·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rickettsia parkeri rickettsiosis, a recently identified spotted fever transmitted by the Gulf Coast tick (Amblyomma maculatum), was first described in 2004. We summarize the clinical and epidemiological features of 12 patients in the United States with confirmed or probable disease attributable to R. parkeri and comment on distinctions between R. parkeri rickettsiosis and other United States rickettsioses. METHODS: Clinical specimens from patients in the United States who reside within the range of A. maculatum for whom an eschar or vesicular rash was described were evaluated by > or =1 laboratory assays at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA) to identify probable or confirmed infection with R. parkeri. RESULTS: During 1998-2007, clinical samples from 12 patients with illnesses epidemiologically and clinically compatible with R. parkeri rickettsiosis were submitted for diagnostic evaluation. Using indirect immunofluorescence antibody assays, immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction assays, and cell culture isolation, we identified 6 confirmed and 6 probable cases of infection with R. parkeri. The aggregate clinical characteristics of these patients revealed a disease similar to but less severe than classically described Rocky Mountain spotted fever. CONCLUSIONS: Closer attention to the distinct clinical features of the various spotted fever syndromes that exist in the United States and other countries of the Western hemisphere, coupled with more frequent use of specific confirmatory assays, may unveil several unique diseases that have been identified collectively as Rocky Mountain spotted fever during the past century. Accurate assessments of these distinct infections will ultimately provide a more valid description of the currently recognized distribution, incidence, and case-fatality rate of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/592254

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Paddock, C. D., Finley, R. W., Wright, C. S., Robinson, H. N., Schrodt, B. J., Lane, C. C., Ekenna, O., Blass, M. A., Tamminga, C. L., Ohl, C. A., McLellan, S. L. F., Goddard, J., Holman, R. C., Openshaw, J. J., Sumner, J. W., Zaki, S. R., & Eremeeva, M. E.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-11
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1188-1196
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2165485734
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rickettsia parkeri Rickettsiosis and Its Clinical Distinction from Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/592254
The paper
Paddock, C. D., Finley, R. W., Wright, C. S., Robinson, H. N., Schrodt, B. J., Lane, C. C., Ekenna, O., Blass, M. A., Tamminga, C. L., Ohl, C. A., McLellan, S. L. F., Goddard, J., Holman, R. C., Openshaw, J. J., Sumner, J. W., Zaki, S. R., & Eremeeva, M. E. (2008). Rickettsia parkeri Rickettsiosis and Its Clinical Distinction from Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/592254

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.