Cited by 24Infection Control and VentilationRespiratory viral infections researchInfection Control in Healthcare

Exploration of the effectiveness of social distancing on respiratory pathogen transmission implicates environmental contributions

Open access
Broderick, Michael P., Hansen, Christian J., Russell, Kevin L.·2008·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In both military and civilian settings, transmission of respiratory pathogens may be due to person-to-person and environmental contributions. This possibility was explored in a military training setting, where rates of febrile respiratory illness (FRI) often reach epidemic levels. METHODS: Population size and FRI rates were monitored over 10 months in the units of 50-90 individuals. Some units were open to the influx of potentially infectious convalescents (hereafter referred to as "open units," and some were closed to such an influx (hereafter referred to as "closed units"). Virologic testing and polymerase chain reaction analysis were used to detect adenovirus on surface structures. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) associated with FRI in closed units, compared with open units, was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.28). The OR in units with a population greater than the median size, compared with units with a population lower than the median size was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.23-1.55). Between 5% and 9% of surface samples obtained from selected units harbored viable adenovirus. CONCLUSIONS: FRI rates were not reduced in units that were closed to potentially contagious individuals. These findings imply that the primary source of the pathogen is likely environmental rather than human, and they underscore what is known about other virus types. Diligence in identifying the relative roles of different transmission routes is suggested for civilian settings similar to those described in the current study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/592711

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transmission of respiratory viruses is likely highly complex, dependent on multiple host, virus and environmental factors.

    “In addition, transmission of respiratory viruses is likely highly complex, dependent on multiple host, virus and environmental factors, plus the myriad of interactions between these factors, which may influence the predominant modes of transmission in any given setting (Broderick 2008; Hendley 1988; Kutter 2018; Leung 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Breese BB, Stanbury J, Upham H-V, Calhoun AJ, Van Buren RL, Ken- nedy AS. Influence of crowding on respiratory illness in a large naval training station. War Medicine 1945; 7:143-6.
  2. Lemon HM, Wise H, Hamburger M. Bacterial content of air in army barracks: results. War Medicine 1944; 6:92-101.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Healthcare Infection Con- trol Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for environmental infec- tion control in health-care facilities. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003; 52:1- 42.
  4. Ryan MA, Christian RS, Wohlrabe J. Handwashing and respiratory ill- ness among young adults in military training. Am J Prev Med 2001; 21: 79 -83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broderick, M. P., Hansen, C. J., & Russell, K. L.
Affiliations
Naval Health Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Broderick, Michael P.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-11-15
Volume
198
Issue
10
Pages
1420-1426
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2104185471
Cited by
24
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Navy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
social distancing, respiratory pathogen transmission, febrile respiratory illness, adenovirus, environmental transmission, military training units, surface contamination, population size, transmission routes
MeSH terms
Adenovirus Infections, Human, Adult, Environment, Environmental Microbiology, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Population Density, Respiratory Tract Infections, Logistic Models, Infection Control, Environmental Illness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review