Diversity, Dilemmas, and Monopolies of Niche Construction
Abstract
The behavior of organisms can contribute to the transformation of their environments. When organismal impacts on the environment feed back to influence organismal density, viability, fertility, or persistence, the environment can be construed as an extension of the organism. This process of fitness-enhancing environmental transformation has been called niche construction. We focus on the relationship of niche construction with species or strain diversity and on the variability of investment in niche construction versus reproduction. We demonstrate a fundamental dilemma of niche construction, whereby the construction of a shared resource leads to a tragedy of the commons, with competition tending to eliminate niche construction strategies. The ability to monopolize a niche, either through spatial proximity or through preferential exploitation, can stabilize niche construction and promote ecological coexistence among polymorphic constructors. We consider both sympatric and allopatric origins of niche construction. Under a variety of different construction mechanisms, variability in the investment in niche construction versus reproduction suggests reproductive altruism but is fully consistent with selfish behavior. We discuss the implications of niche-construction theory on the evolution of life cycles and development, behavioral plasticity, the division of labor, and long-term macroevolutionary trends.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modeling NC as a process that changes the capacity of the environment is common and finds inspiration in natural behaviors, such as nest-constructing species.
“Modeling NC as a process that changes the capacity of the environment is common (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009) and finds inspiration in natural behaviors, such as nest-constructing species.”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Krakauer et al., 2009
Previous studies have primarily modeled NC in two different ways: as an increase in the amount of resources that increases the environment's capacity and as a direct increase or decrease in fitness that does not affect capacity.
“Previous studies have primarily modeled NC in two different ways: as an increase in the amount of resources that increases the environment's capacity (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009) and as a direct increase or decrease in fitness that does not affect capacity (Suzuki and Arita, 2009).”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Krakauer et al., 2009
Such models come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.
“Such models lent intuitive insights, such that NC can emerge without direct selection (Laland et al., 1999) and that the ability to monopolize niches enables the emergence of NC (Krakauer et al., 2009) but come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Krakauer et al., 2009
NC studies were at first primarily theoretical, employing differential equations to predict how NC affects evolution.
“NC studies were at first primarily theoretical, employing differential equations to predict how NC affects evolution (Laland et al., 1999;Krakauer et al., 2009).”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Krakauer et al., 2009
The ability to monopolize niches enables the emergence of NC.
“Such models lent intuitive insights, such that NC can emerge without direct selection (Laland et al., 1999) and that the ability to monopolize niches enables the emergence of NC (Krakauer et al., 2009) but come with limitations, such as the fact that niches are identical and agents are not plastic.”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Krakauer et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1019 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution
Danchin, É., Charmantier, A., Champagne, F. A., Mesoudi, A., Pujol, B., & Blanchet, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3028 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Understanding complexity in the human brain
Bassett, D. S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Cultural Niche Construction: An Introduction
Laland, K. N., & O’Brien, M. J. (2011) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-012-0026-6 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Ecological drivers of the Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa
Erwin, D. H., & Tweedt, S. (2012) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-011-9505-7 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments
Nisioti, E., & Moulin-Frier, C. (2023) · The 2023 Conference on Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/isal_a_00668 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krakauer, D. C., Page, K. M., & Erwin, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Santa Fe Institute (US)
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-40
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1986673340
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- niche construction, species diversity, tragedy of the commons, ecological coexistence, reproductive altruism, selfishness, behavioral plasticity, division of labor, macroevolutionary trends
- MeSH terms
- Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, Reproduction, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review