Cited by 572Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionCognitive Science and Education Research

Understanding complexity in the human brain

Open access
Bassett, Danielle S., Gazzaniga, Michael S.·2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Although the ultimate aim of neuroscientific enquiry is to gain an understanding of the brain and how its workings relate to the mind, the majority of current efforts are largely focused on small questions using increasingly detailed data. However, it might be possible to successfully address the larger question of mind-brain mechanisms if the cumulative findings from these neuroscientific studies are coupled with complementary approaches from physics and philosophy. The brain, we argue, can be understood as a complex system or network, in which mental states emerge from the interaction between multiple physical and functional levels. Achieving further conceptual progress will crucially depend on broad-scale discussions regarding the properties of cognition and the tools that are currently available or must be developed in order to study mind-brain mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The human brain is intrinsically organized into modules, creating a high degree of flexibility and adaptability of the system without fundamentally altering underlying structure.

    “As a complex system, the human brain is intrinsically organized into modules, creating a high degree of flexibility and adaptability of the system without fundamentally altering underlying structure (29, 30).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Sporns O 2010 Networks of the Brain MIT Press
  2. [27]Fodor JA 1983 Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bassett, D. S., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Bassett, Danielle S.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
200-209
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086021750
Cited by
572
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH057541)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
brain complexity, complex systems, brain networks, levels of organization, cognition, interdisciplinary neuroscience, philosophy of mind
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Neural Pathways, Psychophysiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review