Cited by 104Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesReproductive tract infections research

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines: Limited Cross‐Protection against Additional HPV Types

Herrero, Rolando·2009·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Approximately 15 different human papillomavirus (HPV) types from 5 species (A5, A6, A7, A9, and A11) may cause cervical cancer. They are grouped according to phylogenetic relatedness, which also correlates with carcinogenicity [1]. The majority of HPV types associated with human cancers are from species A7 (HPV-18, -39, -45, -59, and -68) and A9 (HPV-16, -31, -33, -35, -52, and -58). Given their similarity, phylogenetically related HPV types share capsid epitopes that can elicit a cross-reactive immune response, and, although serological cross-reactivity has been demonstrated in epidemiological studies of naturally infected women with and without cervical cancer [2, 3], vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies were expected to be largely type specific The recent development of and demonstration of efficacy for HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18 L1 virus-like particle vaccines against cervical and other lesions associated with vaccine types has generated enormous enthusiasm as a promising method for partial control of cervical and possibly other cancers. The possibility of cross-protection against other HPV types is an extremely important question, because it could increase the fraction of cervical cancers prevented A recent study showed that the bivalent vaccine against HPV-16 and -18 produced with ASO4 adjuvant (Cervarix) affords partial cross-protection against 6-month persistent infection with HPV-31, -45, and -52 [4], but no data on efficacy against lesions (cervical intraepithelia…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/597308

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrero, R.
Affiliations
Instituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud (CR)
Corresponding author
Herrero, Rolando
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2009-04
Volume
199
Issue
7
Pages
919-922
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2114385466
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
human papillomavirus, HPV vaccine, cross-protection, quadrivalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil, Cervarix, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, persistent HPV infection, HPV 31, HPV 33, HPV35
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross Reactions, Female, Humans, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review