Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccines: Limited Cross‐Protection against Additional HPV Types
Abstract
Approximately 15 different human papillomavirus (HPV) types from 5 species (A5, A6, A7, A9, and A11) may cause cervical cancer. They are grouped according to phylogenetic relatedness, which also correlates with carcinogenicity [1]. The majority of HPV types associated with human cancers are from species A7 (HPV-18, -39, -45, -59, and -68) and A9 (HPV-16, -31, -33, -35, -52, and -58). Given their similarity, phylogenetically related HPV types share capsid epitopes that can elicit a cross-reactive immune response, and, although serological cross-reactivity has been demonstrated in epidemiological studies of naturally infected women with and without cervical cancer [2, 3], vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies were expected to be largely type specific The recent development of and demonstration of efficacy for HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18 L1 virus-like particle vaccines against cervical and other lesions associated with vaccine types has generated enormous enthusiasm as a promising method for partial control of cervical and possibly other cancers. The possibility of cross-protection against other HPV types is an extremely important question, because it could increase the fraction of cervical cancers prevented A recent study showed that the bivalent vaccine against HPV-16 and -18 produced with ASO4 adjuvant (Cervarix) affords partial cross-protection against 6-month persistent infection with HPV-31, -45, and -52 [4], but no data on efficacy against lesions (cervical intraepithelia…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Understanding HPV genotype distribution among different populations is essential for predicting the efficacy of current HPV vaccines and devising new vaccine strategies.
“Considering the limited cross protection offered by the current vaccines, understanding the genotype distribution among different population is essential in predicting the efficacy of current vaccine and devising new vaccine strategy [4].”
From HPV Genotypes distribution in Indian women with and without cervical carcinoma: Implication for HPV vaccination program in Odisha, Eastern India (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paavonen, J., Naud, P., Salmerón, J., Wheeler, C., Chow, S.-N., Apter, D., Kitchener, H., Castellsague, X., Teixeira, J., Skinner, Sr., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61248-4 · Cited by 1,655 · see citing works
Lew, J.-B., Simms, K. T., Smith, M. A., Hall, M., Kang, Y.-J., Xu, X. M., Caruana, M., Velentzis, L. S., Bessell, T., Saville, M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30007-5 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Senapati, R., Nayak, B., Kar, S. K., & Dwibedi, B. (2017) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-2136-4 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Considering the limited cross protection offered by the current vaccines, understanding the genotype distribution among different population is essential in predicting the efficacy of current vaccine and devising new vaccine strategy [4].”
Background
- Authors
- Herrero, R.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud (CR)
- Corresponding author
- Herrero, Rolando
- ORCID
- Herrero, Rolando
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 919-922
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2114385466
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, HPV vaccine, cross-protection, quadrivalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil, Cervarix, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, persistent HPV infection, HPV 31, HPV 33, HPV35
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Viral, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross Reactions, Female, Humans, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review