Cited by 22Information Science and LibrariesLibrary Science and InformationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Instances of Ideology in Discursive Practice: Implications for Library and Information Science

Budd, John M.·2001·The Library Quarterly

Abstract

The growth of knowledge in any discipline depends on discursive practice for the assertion of claims and the assessment of claims. At times, however, that discursive practice may be ideological in nature. Ideology is here defined as being grounded in efforts at domination--the ascendance of some ideas over others. Examination of the incidence of ideology in discourse is necessarily interpretive; part of this article explores the application of hermeneutics to the analysis of discourse. A set of examples of discursive practice in library and information science (LIS), purposely selected, is examined for ideological intent. Ultimately, the aim is to demonstrate that some discourse is ideological in nature and purpose, and to point out the implications of such discursive practice for knowledge growth in LIS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/603317

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Budd, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Budd, John M.
Venue
The Library Quarterly
Published
2001-10
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
498-517
ISSN
  • 0024-2519 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-652X
OpenAlex
W1984736996
Cited by
22
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Library Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
ideology, discursive practices, hermeneutics, discourse analysis, domination, knowledge growth, library and information science, disciplinary discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review