The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Proof Is in the Pudding: Feasting and the Origins of Domestication
Abstract
Feasting has been proposed as the major context and impetus behind the intensification of production leading to the domestication of plants and animals. This article examines the way feasting contributes to fitness in traditional societies through the reduction of risks involving subsistence, reproduction, and violent confrontations. As other authors have noted, the risk-reduction strategies used by simple foragers differ significantly from risk-reduction strategies used by transegalitarian hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists. These differences are examined in more detail and are related to the emergence of feasting in transegalitarian societies. Surplus-based feasting is proposed as an entirely new element in community dynamics, probably first developed during the Upper Paleolithic in Europe, but becoming much more widespread in the world with the development of Mesolithic technology. Because feasting entails survival and risk-reduction benefits, it creates inherently inflationary food-production forces. These elements first appear among complex hunter-gatherers and logically lead to the intensification of food production, ultimately resulting in the domestication of plants and animals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recognition of the value of exotic domesticated species amongst early farmers (Hayden 2009) may be important in understanding some of these early movements.”
From Across the Indian Ocean: the prehistoric movement of plants and animals (2011) · cites this paper as Hayden 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1016/j.jaa.2003.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1086/427115 · DOI
- Clarke Michael, Feasts: archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on food, politics, and power
- Condominas Georges, We have eaten the forest
- Earle Timothy, How chiefs come to power: the political economy in prehistory
- Falvey L., Ruminants in the highlands of northern Thailand. Thai‐Australian Highland Agronomy Project
- Hayden Brian, 1982, Plains Anthropologist, 27, 109, 10.1080/2052546.1982.11909100 · DOI
- 10.2307/1385842 · DOI
- 10.1016/0278-4165(90)90005-X · DOI
- Hayden Brian, A complex culture of the British Columbia Plateau: traditional Stl’atl’imx resource use, 10.59962/9780774854139 · DOI
- Hayden Brian, Archaeology: the science of once and future things
- Hayden Brian, Feasts: archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on food, politics, and power
- Hayden Brian, The last hunter‐gatherer societies in the Near East
- Jones Rhys, 1969, Australian Natural History, 16, 224
- Meillassoux Claude, On the mode of production of the hunting band, 10.4324/9781351050234-12 · DOI
- Peacock Sandra, Hunter‐gatherer archaeobotany
- Smith Bruce, Archaeology at the Millennium
- 10.1086/202894 · DOI
- 10.2307/280065 · DOI
- Williams Judith, Clam gardens
- Winterhalder Bruce, Behavioral ecology and the transition to agriculture
- 10.1086/605355 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Across the Indian Ocean: the prehistoric movement of plants and animals
Fuller, D. Q., Boivin, N., Hoogervorst, T., & Allaby, R. (2011) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00067934 · Cited by 328
Cultivation of cereals by the first farmers was not more productive than foraging.
Bowles, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010733108 · Cited by 134
Fuller, D. Q., & Qin, L. (2010) · Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.1179/146141010x12640787648531 · Cited by 92
An Emerging Paradigm Shift in the Origins of Agriculture
Fuller, D. Q. (2010) · General Anthropology · doi:10.1111/j.1939-3466.2010.00010.x · Cited by 56
Scales of plant stewardship in the precontact Pacific Northwest, USA
Carney, M., & Connolly, T. (2024) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/09596836241247307 · Cited by 4
“…that one continuum defining human-plant interactions is insufficient to explain these changes as they take substantial time, spanning climatic, cultural, and technological changes (Fuller et al., 2010, 2012; Hayden, 2009; Rosen and Rivera-Collazo, 2012; Wollstonec-roft et al., 2008; Zeder, 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayden, B.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 597-601
- ISSN
- 0011-3204
- 1537-5382
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review