Cited by 328Global Maritime and Colonial HistoriesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesMaritime and Coastal Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 72 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Across the Indian Ocean: the prehistoric movement of plants and animals

Open access

Abstract

Here is a major research project that is peopling the Indian Ocean with prehistoric seafarers exchanging native crops and stock between Africa and India. Not the least exciting part of the work is the authors' contention that the prime movers of this maritime adventure were not the great empires but a multitude of small-scale entrepreneurs.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper synthesizes archaeological, linguistic, and genetic evidence for prehistoric Indian Ocean contacts, arguing that small-scale coastal societies—not major empires—drove early translocations of crops, animals, and maritime technology between Africa, Arabia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. It traces an Arabian Sea corridor from c. 2000 BC and later Bay of Bengal/Indian Ocean linkages through the Iron Age.

Key findings

  • African crops including sorghum, pearl millet, and finger millet reached South Asia around the end of the Harappan era, with evidence from 33 sites in the second millennium BC; five African crops reached South Asia shortly after c. 2000 BC.
  • Broomcorn millet of Chinese origin moved westward by c. 2200 BC, appearing in Pakistan c. 1900 BC, Yemen around 2000 BC, and Sudanese Nubia c. 1700 BC, while absent from Egypt and Mesopotamia; zebu cattle also moved from India to Yemen and East Africa, creating hybrid African taurine–Indian zebu stocks.
  • Eastward translocations included Southeast Asian tree crops to South India: mango charcoal at Sanganakallu dates to 1400–1300 BC and sandalwood to c. 1300 BC; bananas/plantains, greater yam, taro, chickens, and commensals moved to Africa, with banana phytoliths in Cameroon implying arrival by c. 500 BC.
  • Austronesian sail-boat and outrigger technology, along with related loanwords, spread around the Indian Ocean, reinforcing the role of small-scale seafaring societies in creating early inter-regional contacts.

Methods

  • Interdisciplinary synthesis/review drawing on archaeobotany, historical linguistics, genetics, and archaeology to reconstruct prehistoric Indian Ocean translocations.
  • Data include archaeological evidence of translocated crop plants, linguistic evidence for tree crops and boat technology, and genetic studies of domesticated and commensal animals across East Africa, Arabia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.
  • Main analysis integrates these lines of evidence to constrain the timing and geography of contacts and to argue that small-scale coastal societies were the primary agents.

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors say “we still have only scattered interdisciplinary puzzle pieces, and are very far from a complete or even near complete picture”; banana phytolith evidence needs further work to rule out other Musa uses; early Ugandan banana claims are dubious due to stratigraphic dating and morphology; chicken bone identification is difficult; commensal dispersal context is unknown; maritime vocabulary has pitfalls; and the drivers of long voyages remain enigmatic.
  • Evident from the text: many conclusions rest on indirect or sparse evidence, including single-site phytolith finds, linguistic reconstructions, and genetic phylogeography, with dating and identification uncertainties acknowledged throughout.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003598x00067934

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

4 of 72 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Peninsular India's grey junglefowl appears to have provided a key gene found in many modern chickens, namely the gene for yellow legs.

    “whereas peninsular India's grey junglefowl appears to have provided a key gene found in many modern chickens, namely the gene for yellow legs, which are indeed distinct from the red legs of wild red junglefowl, and white and black-legged chickens (Eriksson et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eriksson et al. 2008 source

      The Results (Phylogenetic Analysis; page unavailable) show that the domestic yellow-skin allele clusters with grey junglefowl sequences, and the Discussion identifies grey junglefowl as its most likely source. The cited passages do not establish the sentence’s specific comparison with red-legged wild red junglefowl and white- or black-legged chickens. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Chickens were probably brought into domestication more than once, as suggested by genetic data.

    “Across this area, chickens were probably brought into domestication more than once, as suggested by genetic data, although good zooarchaeological data remains scarce (see Fuller 2007: 400-401; Kanginakudru et al. 2008;Berthouly-Salazar et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fuller 2007: 400-401

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kanginakudru et al. 2008 source
    • cites Berthouly-Salazar et al. 2010 source
  • Findingcitation

    Claims for earlier bananas in Uganda at Munsa are more dubious due to stratigraphic dating issues and questions about preserved morphology.

    “Claims for earlier bananas in Uganda, at Munsa (Lejju et al. 2006), are more dubious, due especially to stratigraphic dating issues but also due to questions about preserved morphology (Neumann & Hildebrand 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lejju et al. 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Neumann & Hildebrand 2009 source

      In “Current archaeobotanical evidence: The state of the art” (page unavailable), the paper questions the Munsa phytoliths’ identification and notes that dating of the lower core relies on interpolation, with a large hiatus between the lower and upper parts. It does not support the claim’s emphasis on stratigraphic dating as the chief problem: it says questions of authenticity relate mainly to identification. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    There is a large accumulation of evidence for African crops in India from the second millennium BC, including finds from 33 sites.

    “in contrast, there is now a large accumulation of evidence for these crops in India from the second millennium BC, including finds from 33 sites (Figure 1, right inset).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Iron Age trade is well documented from recent excavations at the urban site of Khao Sam Kaeo in southern Thailand, occupied from c. 400 BC.

    “Iron Age trade is well documented from recent excavations at the urban site of Khao Sam Kaeo in southern Thailand (on the Malay Peninsula) occupied from c. 400 BC (Bellina-Pryce & Silapanth 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bellina-Pryce & Silapanth 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Evidence for regular trade between India and the Malay Peninsula in the form of Indian-style stone beads and ceramics (Northern Black Polished Ware) is extensive for the later part of the first millennium BC and predates the Indo-Roman trade era.

    “Evidence for regular trade between India and the Malay Peninsula in the form of Indian-style stone beads and ceramics (Northern Black Polished Ware) is extensive for the later part of the first millennium BC (Bellina & Glover 2004), and predates the Indo-Roman trade era.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bellina & Glover 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Crop evidence from Khao Sam Kaeo indicates the presence of Indian domesticates, including mungbean and horsegram, both of which originated in south India.

    “Crop evidence from this site also indicates the presence of Indian domesticates, especially some of the classic pulses for making dal dishes in peninsular India, including mungbean (Vigna radiata) and horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum), both of which had their origins in south India (Castillo & Fuller 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Castillo & Fuller 2010
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    All these species date to the same stratum of Dravidian languages, with reconstructible etyma in Proto-South Dravidian, at the same level as textile-related terminology, crops of African origins and metallurgical terms.

    “In linguistic terms, all of these species date to the same stratum of Dravidian languages, with reconstructible etyma in Proto-South Dravidian, at the same level as textile-related terminology (Fuller 2008), crops of African origins and metallurgical terms, especially for gold and copper (Fuller 2007;also Southworth 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fuller 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fuller 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Southworth 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Broomcorn millet is found in Pakistan at c. 1900 BC, Yemen at around 2000 BC, and Sudanese Nubia by c. 1700 BC, while absent from Egypt and Mesopotamia.

    “Broomcorn millet is known from other central Asian sites from around 2000 BC and is found in Pakistan at c. 1900 BC, Yemen at around 2000 BC, and in Sudanese Nubia by c. 1700 BC (Figure 1, left inset), while being absent from intervening regions such as Egypt and Mesopotamia (Fuller & Boivin 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fuller & Boivin 2009 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Contact between sailors and boat-builders from different backgrounds intensified subsequently, and at least since Islamic times many more examples of Indian Ocean maritime vocabulary transgressing linguistic boundaries can be observed.

    “Subsequently, contact between sailors and boat-builders from different backgrounds intensified, and at least since Islamic times we can observe many more examples of Indian Ocean maritime vocabulary transgressing linguistic boundaries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    By Iron Age times, systematic trade between urban systems was taking place across the Bay of Bengal and between India and the Red Sea.

    “By Iron Age times, systematic trade between urban systems was taking place across the Bay of Bengal and between India and the Red Sea.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Horse purslane was present in the Ganges basin from the Chalcolithic period (after 1400 BC), probably infesting dry rice fields, and in south India by early historic times (c.300 BC) at Paithan on the Godavari River in Maharashtra.

    “It was present in the Ganges basin from the Chalcolithic period (after 1400 BC), probably infesting dry rice fields (Fuller & Qin 2009: tab.2), and in south India by early historic times (c.300 BC), at Paithan on the Godavari River in Maharashtra (Fuller, unpublished).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fuller & Qin 2009: tab.2 source
    • cites Fuller, unpublished

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Zebu cattle added important genetic traits to African cattle.

    “zebu cattle added important genetic traits to African cattle”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Archaeological wood charcoal from Sanganakallu has produced probable mango and Citrus specimens from levels dating to 1400-1300 BC, confirming the adoption of these Southeast Asian arboriculture species prior to the Iron Age.

    “Archaeological wood charcoal from the Neolithic site of Sanganakallu (Sannarachamma) in south India has produced a few specimens of probable mango, from levels dating to 1400-1300 BC, with probable Citrus as well, which confirms the adoption of these Southeast Asian arboriculture species prior to the Iron Age (Asouti & Fuller 2008: 134).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Asouti & Fuller 2008: 134

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Mouse forms found on Madagascar are a genetically distinctive subspecies found otherwise in Yemen, implying movement southwards from Yemen after an introduction to there from India.

    “Nevertheless, the mouse forms found on Madagascar are a genetically distinctive subspecies found otherwise in Yemen (Mus musculus ssp.gentilus), implying movement southwards from Yemen after an introduction to there from India (Duplantier et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Duplantier et al. 2002 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The transfer of African crops took place primarily between north-east Africa and/or Yemen and western India, probably outside the context of Bronze Age trade between major civilisations.

    “Given the lack of any other material evidence for Harappan or South Asian contacts with the Red Sea or Africa before 2000 BC, we have argued that this transfer took place primarily between north-east Africa and/or Yemen and western India, probably outside of the context of the Bronze Age trade between major civilisations (Boivin & Fuller 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boivin & Fuller 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Areca-nut palm and Piper betle are probably from Island Southeast Asia.

    “These include the Areca-nut palm, the nuts of which are chewed as a stimulant together with slaked lime and the leaves of the vine Piper betle.Both are probably from Island Southeast Asia (see e.g.Zumbroich 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zumbroich 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Citrus medica and most domesticated mangos may have come to south India via lands to the north, with probable origins in north-east India or northern Southeast Asia.

    “Other Southeast Asian tree crops may have come to south India via lands to the north, as they have probable origins in north-east India or northern Southeast Asia, around the Assam/Burma/Yunnan area westwards to the eastern Himalayan foothills; these include Citrus medica (the citron, precursor of the lemon) and most domesticated mangos (Mangifera indica) (see Asouti & Fuller 2008: 91, 114-15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Asouti & Fuller 2008: 91, 114-15

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The Harappan civilisation was involved in maritime trade with Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia in the second half of the third millennium BC.

    “It is, of course, well documented that the Harappan civilisation was involved in maritime trade with Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia in the second half of the third millennium BC (e.g.Ratnagar 1994;Ray 2003: 84-99).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ratnagar 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ray 2003: 84-99
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Harappan maritime trade was between urban actors and increasingly appears to have been built on earlier regional contacts between small-scale coastal fishing and agropastoral societies.

    “But this trade was between urban actors, and increasingly appears to have been built on earlier regional contacts between small-scale coastal fishing and agropastoral societies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The prime movers of the prehistoric Indian Ocean maritime adventure were not the great empires but a multitude of small-scale entrepreneurs.

    “Not the least exciting part of the work is the authors' contention that the prime movers of this maritime adventure were not the great empires but a multitude of small-scale entrepreneurs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    By the later first millennium BC, there were large urban sites in both India and the Malay Peninsula.

    “By this period of the later first millennium BC, we are dealing with large urban sites in both India and the Malay Peninsula.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Sorghum, pearl millet and finger millet originated in Africa and arrived in India at some point in prehistory.

    “It has been known for many years that some of the major crops of the drier regions of India, such as sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana), originated in Africa and arrived in India at some point in prehistory (e.g.Possehl 1986;Fuller 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Possehl 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fuller 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Asian house shrew (Suncus murinus) is a ship-borne invasive species that originated in South Asia.

    “Finally, the Asian house shrew (Suncus murinus), is also a ship-borne invasive species that originated in South Asia (Yamagata et al. 1995;Kurachi et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yamagata et al. 1995 source
    • cites Kurachi et al. 2007 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The luxury-item explanation is probably not enough to explain all contact, and perhaps in particular the more long-ranging contact.

    “But this explanation is probably not enough to explain all contact, and perhaps in particular the more long-ranging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Historical linguistic data suggest perhaps three separate introductions of chickens to Africa, including two from the north across the Sahara and one from the Indian Ocean and the east coast of Africa.

    “While some chickens may have first entered Africa overland, moving up the Nile from Egypt to Nubia, historical linguistic data suggest perhaps three separate introductions, including two from the north across the Sahara, and one from the Indian Ocean and the east coast of Africa (Williamson 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williamson 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    De Langhe made a fairly convincing case for a trans-African dispersal route for banana from the East African coast through Usambara and Pare and along the northern fringe of the equatorial rainforest into West Africa, from where plantains possibly fueled the Bantu expansion.

    “De Langhe (2007) has made a fairly convincing case for a trans-African dispersal route for the banana, from the East African coast, through the forest patches of Usambara and Pare and along the northern fringe of the equatorial rainforest, into West Africa, from where plantains are argued to have possibly 'fueled' the Bantu expansion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites De Langhe 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In South Asia, wild bananas and their relatives are few and their distributions are limited mainly to the wetter rainforests and moist deciduous hill forests.

    “In South Asia, wild bananas and their relatives are few, and their distributions are limited, mainly to the wetter rainforests and moist deciduous hill forests (Fuller & Madella 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fuller & Madella 2009 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Banana was initially domesticated in New Guinea, probably with additional input of varieties from the Philippines.

    “The banana is another crop-plant that comes from the east, with recent research favouring initial domestication in New Guinea, but probably with additional input of varieties from the Philippines (e.g.Donohoe & Denham 2009;Kennedy 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Donohoe & Denham 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kennedy 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The evidence militates against independent invention of the outrigger in South Asia and/or East Africa.

    “militate against independent invention in South Asia and/or East Africa”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Translocations across the Bay of Bengal would have required a broadening of ecological tolerance, or extra efforts in terms of cultural practice.

    “Translocations would have required a broadening of ecological tolerance, or extra efforts in terms of cultural practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The dry tropical woodlands and savannahs dominate much of peninsular India, and the wet tropical forests of Southeast Asia are poorly matched.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The absence of bananas/plantains, greater yam and taro from intervening areas like northern India and Arabia makes a coastal route of transfer problematic and points to a central Indian Ocean corridor.

    “All three Asian taxa are found traditionally across the African continent, but their absence from intervening areas like northern India and Arabia makes Murdoch's (1959: 222) hypothesis of a coastal route of transfer problematic, and instead points to a central Indian Ocean corridor (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murdoch 1959: 222

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The absence of a taxon from intervening land regions indicates that its dispersal occurred via the Indian Ocean rather than overland.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Bananas/plantains, greater yam and taro are entirely introduced to Africa.

    “It is clear, however, that bananas (or plantains) (Musa paradisiaca), are entirely introduced to Africa, as were the greater yam (Dioscorea alata) and taro (Colocasia esculenta).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Chickens appear to be deeply culturally embedded in West and Central African subsistence, suggesting considerable time-depth to their presence, although this is not yet supported by archaeozoology.

    “As with taro and bananas, chickens appear to be deeply culturally embedded in West and Central African subsistence, suggesting considerable time-depth to their presence, although this is not yet supported by archaeozoology (Williamson 2000;cf. MacDonald 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Williamson 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites MacDonald 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These wider transformations included the transfer of words, languages, ideas and technologies, the translocation of species with both positive and negative consequences for future generations, and the alteration of the genetic make-up of people, plants and animals around the Indian Ocean.

    “These included the transfer of words, languages, ideas and technologies, the translocation of species with both positive and negative consequences for future generations, and the alteration of the very genetic make-up of people, plants and animals all around the Indian Ocean.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The presence of the house mouse in the Epipalaeolithic Near East implies that it dispersed in the absence of human sedentism and perhaps only evolved as a commensal later with the development of Near Eastern agriculture.

    “although its presence in the Epipalaeolithic (Natufian) of the Near East implies that it dispersed in the absence of human sedentism and perhaps only evolved as a commensal later with the development of Near Eastern agriculture (Auffray et al. 1990); when commensal mice first occurred in South Asia is unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Auffray et al. 1990 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Knowledge of monsoon/trade wind and current patterns, adequate food supplies, and motivations for long return voyages were necessary for these long-distance voyages.

    “but knowledge of these patterns, adequate food supplies, and the motivations for long return voyages were also necessary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of a taxon from intervening land regions indicates that its dispersal occurred via the Indian Ocean rather than overland.

    “apparently via the Indian Ocean based on their absence from the flora of intervening land regions (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Iran).”
    “their absence from intervening areas like northern India and Arabia makes Murdoch's (1959: 222) hypothesis of a coastal route of transfer problematic, and instead points to a central Indian Ocean corridor (Figure 3).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The dry tropical woodlands and savannahs dominate much of peninsular India, and the wet tropical forests of Southeast Asia are poorly matched.

    “the dry tropical woodlands and savannahs that dominate much of peninsular India are poorly matched with the wet tropical forests of Southeast Asia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Malagasy peopling of Madagascar occurred sometime in the first millennium AD.

    “the Malagasy peopling of Madagascar sometime in the first millennium AD”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The banana phytoliths from Nkang in Cameroon provide evidence for Asian species introduction into the moist tropics of Africa.

    “this claim still rests heavily on the banana phytoliths from Nkang in Cameroon”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Botanical and faunal translocations via maritime activity suggest that movements across the Indian Ocean occurred as early as the second millennium BCE.

    “New data for long-distance exchange come from promising studies that trace botanical and faunal translocations via maritime activity, suggesting that movements across the Indian Ocean occurred as early as the second millennium bce (Fuller & Boivin 2009, Fuller et al. 2011).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Fischer, 1938, Where did the sandalwood tree (Santalum album Linn.) evolve?, Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 40, 458
  2. Ratnagar, 1994, Harappan trade in its ‘world context’, Man and Environment, 19, 115
  3. Hutterer, 1990, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vertebrate Biogeography and Systematics in the Tropics, 309
  4. Williamson, 2000, The origins and development of African livestock: archaeology, genetics, linguistics and ethnography, 368
  5. Fuller, 2008, Linguistics, archaeology and the human past, 1
  6. Fuller, 2003, Food, fuel and fields. Progress in African archaeobotany, 239
  7. Castillo, 2010, Studies in honour of Ian Glover, 91
  8. Plu, 1985, La momie de Ramse’s II. Contribution scientifique à l'égyptologie:, 166

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fuller, D. Q., Boivin, N., Hoogervorst, T., & Allaby, R.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2011-05
Volume
85
Issue
328
Pages
544-558
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W2097660788
Cited by
328
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antiquity (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Warwick (cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Warwick
  • University College London
  • University of Oxford
  • Institute of Archaeology, University College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Keywords
prehistoric seafaring, maritime exchange, Indian Ocean, animal husbandry, small entrepreneurs, prehistoric trade, prehistoric migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review