CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of Stable Isotopes: From the Archaic to the Horticultural Communities in Central Chile

Sanhueza, Lorena, Falabella, Fernanda·2010·Current Anthropology
DOI 10.1086/649055
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Diet and mobility at the end of the Archaic period and the initial stage of the Early Ceramic period in central Chile are the subjects of this paper and are discussed on the basis of the results of stable isotope analysis of 20 individuals sampled from the Andean cordillera, central valley, and coast. The results indicate that the diet of Archaic groups living along the coast did not incorporate marine resources to any significant extent. Individuals sampled from the Early Ceramic period do not reveal consumption of animal protein, which raises the question of alternative sources for the protein necessary for survival. In terms of mobility, the results of the investigation suggest that the cordillera was occupied by people with a high‐mobility pattern.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/649055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human paleodiets inferred from stable isotopes in human remains from the Chilean side of the Andes indicate the existence of diverse economic modes associated to different parts of the landscape.

    “Human paleodiets inferred from stable isotopes in human remains from the Chilean side of the Andes indicate the existence of diverse economic modes associated to different parts of the landscape (Sanhueza and Falabella, 2010).”

    From Geographic vectors of human mobility in the andes (34–36° S): comparative analysis of ‘minor’ obsidian sources (2016) · cites this paper as Sanhueza and Falabella, 2010

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1086/512987 · DOI
  2. Bocherens H., Biogeochemical approaches to paleodietary analysis
  3. 10.1086/507186 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0003598X0009298X · DOI
  5. 10.2307/3557575 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0712228105 · DOI
  7. Falabella F., 2006, Valdivia
  8. Falabella F., 1991, Santiago: Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología.
  9. 10.1017/S1045663500007641 · DOI
  10. Falabella F., 1989, Santiago: Editor
  11. Gajardo‐Tobar R., “Piedras con Tacitas
  12. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.10.015 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S1040-6182(01)00058-1 · DOI
  14. Koch P. L., Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science
  15. 10.1016/0883-2927(87)90021-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0016-7037(84)90259-X · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0016-7037(84)90338-7 · DOI
  18. Moser H., Proceedings of the Banff Symposium, UNESCO‐WMO‐IAHS 1:15–23
  19. Planella M. T., 2005, Chungara, 37, 59
  20. Ramírez J. M., 1991, Santiago: Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología.
  21. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0387 · DOI
  22. Rozanski K., 1995, Etudes Andines, 24, 379
  23. Sanhueza L., 2003, Chungara, 35, 23
  24. 10.1126/science.6344217 · DOI
  25. Schoeninger M. J., 2000, New York: Plenum.
  26. Schwarcz H. P., Biogeochemical approaches to paleodietary analysis
  27. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0380 · DOI
  28. Schwarcz H. P., 1991, Toronto: Dundurn.
  29. Stehberg R., 1978, San Rafael, 3, 277
  30. Tieszen L. L., Proceedings of the First World Congress on Mummy Studies I:427–441
  31. Tykot R. H., 2004, Pp., 433
  32. 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.08.002 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/971915 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sanhueza, L., & Falabella, F.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2010-02
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
DOI
10.1086/649055
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review