The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food Order
Abstract
The widespread perception of a "food crisis" since the early 1970s reflects a real turning point in the global structure of production and distribution of food grains. Scarcity is always an aspect of capitalist relations, but its specific form is determined historically through the international food order. The latter is a stable set of complementary state policies whose implicit coordination creates specific prices relative to other prices, a specific pattern of specialization, and resulting patterns of consumption and trade. The social consequences of those orderly international arrangements make sense within a Marxist conception of accumulation and class formation on a world scale. I present a historical analysis of the rise of an international food order after World War II whose principal axis was food aid from the United States to formerly self-sufficient agrarian societies. This order had contradictory effects, both economic and political, leading to a reorganization of aid and trade, higher prices, and a possible shift of grain specialization within the international division of labor. The postwar international food order left specific legacies for classes and nations. For example, the low prices of the postwar order contributed to both agricultural underdevelopment and urban concentrations of dispossessed people in the Third World in the 1950s and 1960s as a particular form of capitalist penetration. The elements left by the decomposition of the postwar order, however…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local production chains became linked to extra-national markets that were themselves created by core states.
“Local production chains became linked to extra-national markets -themselves the creation of core states (Friedmann 1982).”
From Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South (2018) · cites this paper as Friedmann 1982
Citations
Cites
Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures
Boorman, S. A., & White, H. C. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226228 · Cited by 788
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ajl, M. (2018) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437 · Cited by 21
Harris, J., Anderson, M., Clément, C., & Nisbett, N. (2019) · IDS Bulletin · doi:10.19088/1968-2019.112 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedmann, H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- S248-S286
- ISSN
- 0002-9602
- 1537-5390
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review