Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker

Pande, Amrita·2010·Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society

Abstract

Feminist analysts of women in global production have demonstrated that “good” labor is not found ready‐made. It is produced through the practices and rhetorics of the shop floor. In this ethnographic study of commercial surrogacy in a small clinic in western India, I argue that a good commercial surrogate, like a good laborer of global production, is not found ready‐made in India. She is produced, instead, in fertility clinics and surrogacy hostels. However, unlike women in factories who have to be constituted as the perfect worker of managers’ dreams, surrogates have to be constituted as the perfect mother‐worker subject. The surrogate in India is expected to be a disciplined contract worker who gives up the baby at the termination of the contract. But she is simultaneously urged to be a nurturing mother for the baby and a selfless mother who will not negotiate the payment received. When one’s mother identity is regulated and terminated by a contract, being a good mother often conflicts with being a good worker, which makes the mother‐worker identity a rather difficult one to produce. It requires a disciplinary project that works discursively, one that works through the materialization of discourses in the form of enclosures or surrogacy hostels. The production of this mother‐worker subject, however, does not go unchallenged. What we see instead is a continuum of resistance composed of discursive, individual, and collective actions that disrupt the production of a reified, unitary mother‐worker subject.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/651043

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Anderson Elizabeth S, 1990, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, 71
  2. Bhargav Padma, 2006, Gujarat Becomes the Preferred Medical Tourism Destination: More than 1,000 NRIs and Foreigners Visit Every Year
  3. Hershatter Gail, 1900, The Workers of Tianjin
  4. Krishnan Vidya, Baby Biz: Indian Set to Trump Global Surrogacy Laws
  5. Pande Amrita, 2008, A Quest for Alternative Sociology, ed. Kenji Kosaka and Masahiro Ogino, 71
  6. Rothman Barbara Katz, Embryos, Ethics, and Women’s Rights: Exploring the New Reproductive Technologies, ed. Elaine Hoffman Baruch, Amadeo F. D’Adamo Jr., and Joni Seager, 95–100.
  7. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1994.tb00239.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.1994.tb00239.x
  8. Stanworth Michelle, her Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood, and Medicine, 10–35
  9. Teman, Elly. 2006. “The Birth of a Mother: Mythologies of Surrogate Motherhood in Israel.” PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Pande, A.
Venue
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
Published
2010-06
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
969-992
ISSN
  • 0097-9740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6943
OpenAlex
W1965128889
Cited by
379
References
40
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/651043
The paper
Pande, A. (2010). Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1086/651043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.