Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monetary Costs and Benefits of Crime Prevention Programs

Welsh, Brandon C., Farrington, David P.·2000·Crime and Justice

Abstract

Few attempts have been made to calculate the monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs. Existing calculations for situational, developmental, and community prevention, and correctional intervention programs give hopeful indications that benefits often exceed costs. However, the noncomparability of methods used in different studies makes it impossible to determine which program or class of programs is the most economically efficient. A "how-to" manual should be developed and followed. A wide range of benefits should be measured, including health, employment, and education benefits, as well as crime reduction. Research is needed on issues such as using average versus marginal costs, using capital versus operating costs, discounting costs and benefits over different time periods, using tangible versus intangible victim costs, and calculating costs and benefits from different perspectives (such as victim, taxpayer, or program participant). Because the value of an economic analysis is limited by the quality of the research design, greater use should be made of high quality research designs combined with benefit-cost analyses. Funding agencies should commission and support benefit-cost evaluations of new and existing prevention programs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/652202

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 51

Metadata

Authors
Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P.
Venue
Crime and Justice
Published
2000-01
Volume
27
Pages
305-361
ISSN
  • 0192-3234
  • 2153-0416
Cited by
51
References
29
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monetary Costs and Benefits of Crime Prevention Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/652202
The paper
Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Monetary Costs and Benefits of Crime Prevention Programs. Crime and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1086/652202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.