Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Synthesis of Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous reviews have often focused on specific groups, including women, adolescents, individuals who use drugs, people living with a mental health condition, and people with sexual or other violent index offences.
“Previous reviews have often focused on specific groups—eg, women,26, 29 adolescents,20, 23 individuals who use drugs,25 people living with a mental health condition,18 and people with sexual21, 28 or other violent19, 27 index offences.”
From Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
The effectiveness of most prison-based treatments on recidivism remains unclear because the evidence is inconsistent and subject to a range of limitations.
“Overall, the effectiveness of most prison-based treatments on recidivism remains unclear because the evidence is inconsistent and subject to a range of limitations.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28”
From Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Existing reviews have pooled estimates that combine samples from diverse settings (e.g., prisons and secure psychiatric hospitals) or were published before 2008.
“Also, existing reviews have pooled estimates that combine samples from diverse settings (eg, prisons and secure psychiatric hospitals)24 or were published before 2008.19, 22, 23, 29”
From Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence
DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100611414806 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032885505276969 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128705281747 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: A meta-analytic review
Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hoeve, M., de Vries, S. L. A., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Oort, F. J. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.002 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of the Predictors of Delinquency Among Girls
Hubbard, D. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2002) · Journal of Offender Rehabilitation · doi:10.1300/j076v34n03_01 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Protective factors and resilience
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2003) · Early Prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviour · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489259.006 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Tolan, P. H., Henry, D. B., Schoeny, M. S., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Beaudry, G., Yu, R., Perry, A. E., & Fazel, S. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00170-x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Petrosino, A., & Soydan, H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-005-3540-8 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The Intervention Selection Bias: An Underrecognized Confound in Intervention Research.
Larzelere, R. E., Kuhn, B. R., & Johnson, B. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.289 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Gottfredson, D., Kumpfer, K., Polizzi-Fox, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P., & Vilmenay, M. (2006) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-005-0017-y · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationMentoring Interventions to Affect Juvenile Delinquency and Associated Problems: A Systematic Review
Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, M., Bass, A., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2013) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.4073/csr.2013.10 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Wilson, S. J., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2013) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.5243/jsswr.2013.22 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The Adolescent Diversion Project: 25 Years of Research on an Ecological Model of Intervention
Smith, E. P., Wolf, A. M., Cantillon, D. M., Thomas, O., & Davidson, W. S. (2004) · Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community · doi:10.1300/j005v27n02_03 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Perry, A., Woodhouse, R., Neilson, M., Martyn St James, M., Glanville, J., Hewitt, C., & Trépel, D. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13100966 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- Serious & Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 313-345
- OpenAlex
- W81649949
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 106.29
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Keywords
- juvenile offenders, intervention effectiveness, juvenile justice, recidivism prevention, delinquency treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
