The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantifying Uncertainty in Estimation of Tropical Arthropod Species Richness
Abstract
There is a bewildering range of estimates for the number of arthropods on Earth. Several measures are based on extrapolation from species specialized to tropical rain forest, each using specific assumptions and justifications. These approaches have not provided any sound measure of uncertainty associated with richness estimates. We present two models that account for parameter uncertainty by replacing point estimates with probability distributions. The models predict medians of 3.7 million and 2.5 million tropical arthropod species globally, with 90% confidence intervals of [2.0, 7.4] million and [1.1, 5.4] million, respectively. Estimates of 30 million or greater are predicted to have <0.00001 probability. Sensitivity analyses identified uncertainty in the proportion of canopy arthropod species that are beetles as the most influential parameter, although uncertainties associated with three other parameters were also important. Using the median estimates suggests that in spite of 250 years of taxonomy and around 855,000 species of arthropods already described, approximately 70% await description.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045
“Several attempts to improve global estimates have employed macroecological patterns and biodiversity ratios but the assumptions of these methods have been strongly contested [3vs7, 8vs9, 10vs2, 1112vs13, 14, 15vs5, 16vs17] plus their overall predictions are relevant to only subsets of species, such as insects [9,18-19…”
MethodHow Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?
Stork, N. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citationWhat we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008 · Cited by 437
Marine Biodiversity, Biogeography, Deep-Sea Gradients, and Conservation
Costello, M. J., & Chaudhary, C. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.060 · Cited by 429
Edible insects are the future?
van Huis, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665116000069 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, A. J., Basset, Y., Benke, K. K., Grimbacher, P. S., Miller, S. E., Novotný, V., Samuelson, G. A., Stork, N. E., Weiblen, G. D., & Yen, J. D. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-95
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2178898444
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying Uncertainty in Estimation of Tropical Arthropod Species Richness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/652998
- The paper
- Hamilton, A. J., Basset, Y., Benke, K. K., Grimbacher, P. S., Miller, S. E., Novotný, V., Samuelson, G. A., Stork, N. E., Weiblen, G. D., & Yen, J. D. L. (2010). Quantifying Uncertainty in Estimation of Tropical Arthropod Species Richness. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/652998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.