Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cost‐Effectiveness of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen Screening to Prevent Deaths among HIV‐Infected Persons with a CD4+Cell Count ⩽100 Cells/μL Who Start HIV Therapy in Resource‐Limited Settings

Open access
Meya, David B., Manabe, Yukari C., Castelnuovo, Barbara, Cook, Bethany A., Elbireer, Ali M., Kambugu, Andrew, Kamya, Moses R., Bohjanen, Paul R., Boulware, David R.·2010·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) remains a common AIDS-defining illness in Africa and Asia. Subclinical cryptococcal antigenemia is frequently unmasked with antiretroviral therapy (ART). We sought to define the cost-effectiveness of serum cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) screening to identify persons with subclinical cryptococcosis and the efficacy of preemptive fluconazole therapy. METHODS: There were 609 ART-naive adults with AIDS who started ART in Kampala, Uganda, and who had a serum CRAG prospectively measured during 2004-2006. The number needed to test and treat with a positive CRAG was assessed for > or = 30-month outcomes. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 50 persons (8.2%) were serum CRAG positive when starting ART. Of 295 people with a CD4(+) cell count < or = 100 cells/microL and without prior CM, 26 (8.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%-12.6%) were CRAG positive, of whom 21 were promptly treated with fluconazole (200-400 mg) for 2-4 weeks. Clinical CM developed in 3 fluconazole-treated persons, and 30-month survival was 71% (95% CI, 48%-89%). In the 5 CRAG-positive persons with a CD4(+) cell count < or = 100 cells/microL treated with ART but not fluconazole, all died within 2 months of ART initiation. The number needed to test and treat with CRAG screening and fluconazole to prevent 1 CM case is 11.3 (95% CI, 7.9-17.1) at costs of $190 (95% CI, $132-$287). The number needed to test and treat to save 1 life is 15.9 (95% CI, 11.1-24.0) at costs of $266 (95% CI, $185-$402). The cost per disability-adjusted life year saved is $21 (95% CI, $15-$32). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating CRAG screening into HIV care, specifically targeting people with severe immunosuppression (CD4(+) cell count < or = 100 cells/microL) should be implemented in treatment programs in resource-limited settings. ART alone is insufficient treatment for CRAG-positive persons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/655143

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Meya, D. B., Manabe, Y. C., Castelnuovo, B., Cook, B. A., Elbireer, A. M., Kambugu, A., Kamya, M. R., Bohjanen, P. R., & Boulware, D. R.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2010-08-15
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
448-455
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2127250507
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
16.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost‐Effectiveness of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen Screening to Prevent Deaths among HIV‐Infected Persons with a CD4+Cell Count ⩽100 Cells/μL Who Start HIV Therapy in Resource‐Limited Settings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/655143
The paper
Meya, D. B., Manabe, Y. C., Castelnuovo, B., Cook, B. A., Elbireer, A. M., Kambugu, A., Kamya, M. R., Bohjanen, P. R., & Boulware, D. R. (2010). Cost‐Effectiveness of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen Screening to Prevent Deaths among HIV‐Infected Persons with a CD4+Cell Count ⩽100 Cells/μL Who Start HIV Therapy in Resource‐Limited Settings. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/655143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.