Cited by 782Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Giant Planet Occurrence in the Stellar Mass-Metallicity Plane

Open access
Johnson, John Asher, Aller, Kimberly M., Howard, Andrew W., Crepp, Justin R.·2010·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

Correlations between stellar properties and the occurrence rate of exoplanets can be used to inform the target selection of future planet-search efforts and provide valuable clues about the planet-formation process. We analyze a sample of 1266 stars drawn from the California Planet Survey targets to determine the empirical functional form describing the likelihood of a star harboring a giant planet as a function of its mass and metallicity. Our stellar sample ranges from M dwarfs with masses as low as 0.2 M ⊙ to intermediate-mass subgiants with masses as high as 1.9 M ⊙ . In agreement with previous studies, our sample exhibits a planet-metallicity correlation at all stellar masses; the fraction of stars that harbor giant planets scales as f ∝ 10 1.2[Fe/H] . We can rule out a flat metallicity relationship among our evolved stars (at 98% confidence), which argues that the high metallicities of stars with planets is not likely due to convective envelope "pollution." Our data also rule out a constant planet occurrence rate for [Fe/H] < 0, indicating that giant planets continue to become rarer at sub-Solar metallicities. We also find that planet occurrence increases with stellar mass ( f ∝ M ⋆ ), characterized by a rise from 3% around M dwarfs (0.5 M ⊙ ) to 14% around A stars (2 M ⊙ ), at Solar metallicity. We argue that the correlation between stellar properties and giant planet occurrence is strong supporting evidence of the core-accretion model of planet formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/655775

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 1% of Sun-like stars host a hot Jupiter, and the occurrence rate falls off around M dwarfs.

    “Only 1% of Sun-like stars host one, and the occurrence rate falls off around the most numerous stars, the M dwarfs (Johnson et al. 2010).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Johnson et al. 2010

    The Introduction says M dwarfs are more numerous than Sun-like stars and are less likely to host Jupiter-mass planets. But the paper measures giant-planet occurrence using planets with semimajor axes under 2.5 AU (section 2.2); it does not establish that 1% of Sun-like stars host a hot Jupiter or that the hot-Jupiter rate specifically falls around M dwarfs. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Artigau, É., Biller, B. A., Wahhaj, Z., Hartung, M., Hayward, T. L., Close, L. M., Chun, M. R., Liu, M. C., et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7014, 70141Z.
  2. Bean, J. L., Seifahrt, A., Hartman, H., Nilsson, H., Wiedemann, G., Reiners, A., Dreizler, S., & Henry, T. J. 2009, preprint (ArXiv:0911.3148) · arXiv
  3. Claudi, R. U., Turatto, M., Antichi, J., Gratton, R., Scuderi, S., Cascone, E., Mesa, D., Desidera, S., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 62692Y
  4. Gould, A., Dong, S., Gaudi, B. S., Udalski, A., Bond, I. A., Greenhill, J., Street, R. A., Dominik, M., et al. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Gray, D. F., & Nagar, P. 1985, ApJ, 298, 756
  5. Haghighipour, N., Vogt, S. S., Butler, R. P., Rivera, E. J., Laughlin, G., Meschiari, S., & Henry, G. W. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Hatzes, A. P., Cochran, W. D., Endl, M., McArthur, B., Paulson, D. B., Walker, G. A. H., Campbell, B., & Yang, S. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1383
  6. Howard, A. W., Johnson, J. A., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Wright, J. T., Bernat, D., Henry, G. W., Peek, K. M. G., et al. 2010a, ArXiv e-prints ---. 2010b, ArXiv e-prints 914 JOHNSON ET AL. 2010 PASP, 122:905-915
  7. Meru, F., & Bate, M. R. 2010, ArXiv e-prints Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Benz, W., & Naef, D. 2009, A&A, 501, 1161
  8. Nielsen, E. L., & Close, L. M. 2009, preprint (ArXiv:0909.4531) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Space Sciences Laboratory (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2010-08
Volume
122
Issue
894
Pages
905-915
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2126624130
Cited by
782
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 55
FWCI
25.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
metallicity, stellar mass, M dwarfs, subgiants, planet-metallicity correlation, core accretion, planet formation, stellar evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review