The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Achieving Better Than 1 Minute Accuracy in the Heliocentric and Barycentric Julian Dates
Open accessAbstract
As the quality and quantity of astrophysical data continue to improve, the precision with which certain astrophysical events can be timed becomes limited not by the data themselves, but by the manner, standard, and uniformity with which time itself is referenced. While some areas of astronomy (most notably pulsar studies) have required absolute time stamps with precisions of considerably better than 1 minute for many decades, recently new areas have crossed into this regime. In particular, in the exoplanet community, we have found that the (typically unspecified) time standards adopted by various groups can differ by as much as a minute. Left uncorrected, this ambiguity may be mistaken for transit timing variations and bias eccentricity measurements. We argue that, since the commonly-used Julian Date, as well as its heliocentric and barycentric counterparts, can be specified in several time standards, it is imperative that their time standards always be reported when accuracies of 1 minute are required. We summarize the rationale behind our recommendation to quote the site arrival time, in addition to using BJD TDB , the Barycentric Julian Date in the Barycentric Dynamical Time standard for any astrophysical event. The BJD TDB is the most practical absolute time stamp for extraterrestrial phenomena, and is ultimately limited by the properties of the target system. We compile a general summary of factors that must be considered in order to achieve timing precisions ranging from 15 minutes to 1 µs. Finally, we provide software tools that, in principal, allow one to calculate BJD TDB to a precision of 1 μs for any target from anywhere on Earth or from any spacecraft.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seven temperate terrestrial planets around the nearby ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1
Gillon, M., Triaud, A. H. M. J., Demory, B.-O., Jehin, E., Agol, E., Deck, K. M., Lederer, S. M., de Wit, J., Burdanov, A., Ingalls, J. G., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21360 · Cited by 1,555
State of the Field: Extreme Precision Radial Velocities
Fischer, D. A., Anglada-Escude, G., Arriagada, P., Baluev, R. V., Bean, J. L., Bouchy, F., Buchhave, L. A., Carroll, T., Chakraborty, A., Crepp, J. R., et al. (2016) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001 · Cited by 367
Self-citationPerryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Knutson, H. A., Lewis, N., Fortney, J. J., Burrows, A., Showman, A. P., Cowan, N. B., Agol, E., Aigrain, S., Charbonneau, D., Deming, D., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/22 · Cited by 334
A map of the large day–night temperature gradient of a super-Earth exoplanet
Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., de Wit, J., Madhusudhan, N., Bolmont, E., Heng, K., Kataria, T., Lewis, N., Hu, R., Krick, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17169 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 894
- Pages
- 935-946
- ISSN
- 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3873
- OpenAlex
- W1999652311
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving Better Than 1 Minute Accuracy in the Heliocentric and Barycentric Julian Dates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/655938
- The paper
- Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. (2010). Achieving Better Than 1 Minute Accuracy in the Heliocentric and Barycentric Julian Dates. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1086/655938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.