Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Changes in Bone Density and Turnover with Abacavir‐Lamivudine versus Tenofovir‐Emtricitabine in HIV‐Infected Adults: 48‐Week Results from the ASSERT Study

Stellbrink, Hans‐Jürgen, Orkin, Chloe, Arribas, Jose Ramon, Compston, Juliet, Gerstoft, Jan, Van Wijngaerden, Eric, Lazzarin, Adriano, Rizzardini, Giuliano, Sprenger, Herman G., Lambert, John, Sture, Gunta, Leather, David, Hughes, Sara, Zucchi, Patrizia, Pearce, Helen·2010·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abacavir-lamivudine and tenofovir DF-emtricitabine fixed-dose combinations are commonly used as first-line antiretroviral therapies. However, few studies have comprehensively compared their relative safety profiles. METHODS: In this European, multicenter, open-label, 96-week study, antiretroviral-naive adult subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were randomized to receive either abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir-emtricitabine with efavirenz. Primary analyses were conducted after 48 weeks of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD), a powered secondary end point, was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Bone turnover markers (osteocalcin, procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide, bone specific alkaline phosphatase, and type 1 collagen cross-linked C telopeptide [CTx]) were assessed in an exploratory analysis. RESULTS: A total of 385 subjects were enrolled in the study. BMD loss was observed in both treatment groups, with a significant difference in the change from baseline in both total hip (abacavir-lamivudine group, -1.9%; tenofovir-emtricitabine group, -3.6%; P < .001) and lumbar spine (abacavir-lamivudine group, -1.6%; tenofovir-emtricitabine group, -2.4%; P = .036). BMD loss of >or=6% was more common in the tenofovir-emtricitabine group (13% of the tenofovir-emtricitabine group vs 3% of the abacavir-lamivudine group had a loss of >or=6% in the hip; 15% vs 5% had a loss of >or=6% in the spine). Bone turnover markers increased in both treatment groups over the first 24 weeks, stabilizing or decreasing thereafter. Increases in all markers were significantly greater in the tenofovir-emtricitabine treatment group than in the abacavir-lamivudine group at week 24. All but CTx remained significantly different at week 48 (eg, osteocalcin: abacavir-lamivudine group, +8.07 mg/L; tenofovir-emtricitabine group, +11.92 mg/L; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the impact of first-line treatment regimens on bone. Greater increases in bone turnover and decreases in BMD were observed in subjects treated with tenofovir-emtricitabine than were observed in subjects treated with abacavir-lamivudine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/656417

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Stellbrink, H., Orkin, C., Arribas, J. R., Compston, J., Gerstoft, J., Van Wijngaerden, E., Lazzarin, A., Rizzardini, G., Sprenger, H. G., Lambert, J., Sture, G., Leather, D., Hughes, S., Zucchi, P., & Pearce, H.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2010-10-15
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
963-972
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2144658061
Cited by
405
References
3
FWCI
32.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Changes in Bone Density and Turnover with Abacavir‐Lamivudine versus Tenofovir‐Emtricitabine in HIV‐Infected Adults: 48‐Week Results from the ASSERT Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/656417
The paper
Stellbrink, H., Orkin, C., Arribas, J. R., Compston, J., Gerstoft, J., Van Wijngaerden, E., Lazzarin, A., Rizzardini, G., Sprenger, H. G., Lambert, J., Sture, G., Leather, D., Hughes, S., Zucchi, P., & Pearce, H. (2010). Comparison of Changes in Bone Density and Turnover with Abacavir‐Lamivudine versus Tenofovir‐Emtricitabine in HIV‐Infected Adults: 48‐Week Results from the ASSERT Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/656417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.