The Transformation of Prison Regimes in Late Capitalist Societies
Abstract
Recent studies argue that cultural and political-economic shifts have led to a sea change in penal regimes among modern Western societies, resulting in more punitive social policies in general and a trend toward higher incarceration rates in particular. This is a special case of a wider argument that globalization has led to a decline in state autonomy and convergence on a market-based model of economic and social policy. This thesis has been challenged by the empirical literature on welfare states, which finds persistent cross-national diversity in institutional structures, policies, and patterns of inequality. Focusing on incarceration rates as the outcome of interest, this study evaluates these arguments by applying a Bayesian change-point model to four decades of data from 15 countries. Results show that a regime shift did occur but that incarceration rates increased mainly among countries with unregulated labor markets, decentralized polities, or weak labor unions. Profound institutional differences persist and are fateful for incarceration trajectories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
John Sutton documented changes in penal regimes in countries with less regulation than the US, decentralized political systems, and weak worker protections.
“John Sutton, for example, has documented changes in penal regimes in countries with less regulation than the US, decentralized political systems, and weak protections for workers (Sutton 2013(Sutton , 2004; see also Beckett and Western 2001 for a similar analysis across US states).”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Sutton 2013
Cites
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“John Sut-ton, for example, has documented changes in penal regimes in countries with less regulation than the US, decentralized political systems, and weak protections for workers (Sutton 2013, 2004; see also Beckett and Western 2001 for a similar analysis across US states).”
- Authors
- Sutton, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sutton, John R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 715-746
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1998183170
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- incarceration rates, penal regimes, late capitalism, globalization, welfare state, tipping points, trade unions, political decentralization, Bayesian change point model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review