Cited by 1Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System

Open access
Wakefield, Sara, Turney, Kristin·2025·RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences

Abstract

A “carceral state” represents a critical definitional contrast to the more commonly invoked frames of “mass incarceration” or “mass criminalization.” Mass criminalization scholarship is typically focused on the most proximate causes and consequences of growth in the size of the criminal legal system. In contrast, conceptualizing mass incarceration as merely the most visible feature of a broader carceral state expands the analytical landscape but results in significant tradeoffs. In this article, we engage narratives of the development of carceral states, noting that they resist simple or widely agreed-upon definitions, and vary with respect to how they engage crime, race and racism, politics and the political economy, and the importation of carceral logics to seemingly unrelated institutions. We conclude by reflecting on what can be gained by understanding the United States as a carceral state, rather than simply a nation with persistently high crime and punishment rates.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that the US is better understood as a “carceral state” than simply as a nation with high crime and incarceration rates, because its criminal legal system reaches more people, more severely, for longer, and with broader institutional spillovers than other wealthy democracies. It synthesizes interdisciplinary carceral-state narratives across crime, racism, political economy, and the importation of carceral logics, while emphasizing unresolved definitional and measurement problems.

Key findings

  • US imprisonment rates rose from 79 per 100,000 in 1925 and 93 in 1972 to a peak of about 502 in 2009, then fell to 355 in 2022—a 26 percent decrease from ten years prior—even as life sentences increased.
  • Racial and ethnic disparities remain stark: in 2022, imprisonment rates were 911 for Black people, 426 for Hispanic people, 188 for White people, and 801 for American Indian/Alaska Native people; Black people were more than twice as likely as Hispanic people and about five times as likely as White people to be incarcerated.
  • Between 2012 and 2022, imprisonment-rate declines were largest for Black people (34 percent), followed by Hispanic people (32 percent), Asian people (31 percent), White people (21 percent), and American Indian/Alaska Native people (14 percent); men were about fourteen times more likely than women to be incarcerated (666 vs. 49 per 100,000 in 2022).
  • The carceral state extends beyond prisons: in 2020, more than one-fifth of US residents ages 16+ reported police contact in the prior year; nearly four million adults were under community supervision, down more than 20 percent from the 2007 peak of more than 5.1 million; 29 percent of state and federal prison admissions were related to community supervision violations; and more than nineteen million people carried a felony conviction.

Methods

  • Narrative review of interdisciplinary literature on mass incarceration, mass criminalization, penal states, and carceral states, with the authors positioning themselves as scholars of the consequences of criminal legal system contact engaging adjacent debates.
  • The authors reviewed Annual Review articles using “mass incarceration” or “penal/carceral state,” visualized with Litmaps, and present descriptive figures using sources including the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Vera Institute of Justice, Prison Policy Institute, Uniform Crime Reports, National Crime Victimization Survey, and Shannon et al. (2017).
  • The article is conceptual and synthetic rather than a systematic meta-analysis or new empirical test; it organizes the literature around four contested domains: crime/fear of crime, racism and racial subjugation/settler colonialism, politics and political economy/welfare-state decline, and importation of carceral logics into adjacent institutions.

Limitations

  • The paper states that there is no clear, widely agreed-upon definition of a carceral state; broad conceptions risk becoming so diffuse as to be untestable and may obscure substantial state-by-state and temporal variation, while narrow penal-state conceptions may miss the broader carceral field.
  • The paper states that measurement of race and ethnicity is not standardized across agencies, states, or time; data on conditions of confinement, adjacent institutions, and cross-national carceral comparisons are limited; and the review necessarily highlights some narratives while omitting others.
  • Evident from the text: this is a review that does not resolve competing causal claims or provide new causal estimates, and its descriptive figures rely on secondary data sources with their own known limitations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

38 of 243 cited sources checked · 25 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Myriad studies document the so-called collateral consequences of much higher rates of contact with the criminal legal system for all aspects of social life.

    “First, myriad studies document the socalled collateral consequences of much higher rates of contact with the criminal legal system for all aspects of social life (for reviews, see Kirk and Wakefield 2018;National Research Council 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kirk and Wakefield 2018 source
    • cites National Research Council 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    A study of 100 million US traffic stops found police were less likely to discover contraband or evidence when searching Black and Hispanic drivers than White drivers.

    “Another study, which examined one hundred million traffic stops across the United States, also found that police were less likely to discover contraband or evidence when searching Black and Hispanic drivers than White drivers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pierson et al. 2020 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Crime

    Demographic characteristics of both offenders and victims can structure US crime trends.

    “Demographic characteristics-of both people who commit crimes and people who are victims of crimes-can structure US crime trends (Rosenfeld and Weisburd 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rosenfeld and Weisburd 2016 source

      The Abstract identifies demographic change and differences in crime trends by age, race, ethnicity, and gender as important to explaining overall US crime trends. It also says trends can reflect changes in offending and victimization, but it does not link victims’ demographic characteristics specifically to those trends. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Police contact is perhaps the most common form of criminal legal contact.

    “Police contact is perhaps the most common form of criminal legal contact, with police-initiated stops being heralded by law enforcement agencies as a successful crimeprevention tactic (Petersen et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Petersen et al. 2023 source

      The Background sections describe police-initiated stops as a widely used crime-prevention tactic and say advocates emphasize their crime-reduction benefits. They do not establish that police contact is the most common form of criminal legal contact; the cited sentence’s first clause remains unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Conceptual ambiguity with describing the US as a monolithic carceral state is most awkward when accounting for wide state-by-state and temporal variation.

    “This comes at a cost; the conceptual ambiguity with describing the United States as a (monolithic) carceral state is at its most awkward when one accounts for wide state-by-state and temporal variation in criminal legal system policy and practice (Campbell 2018;Goodman et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Campbell 2018 source
    • cites Goodman et al. 2017 source
  • May combine two claims. 121
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 136
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Work in this area is relatively clear with respect to which criminal justice policy changes increased incarceration rates, but has much less to say about what triggered those policy changes.

    “Work in this area is relatively clear with respect to which criminal justice policy changes increased incarceration rates (see Bushway et al. 2025, this issue), for example, but has much less to say about what triggered those policy changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bushway et al. 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Early works called attention to the staggeringly disparate rates of crime and incarceration.

    “Early works called attention to the staggeringly disparate rates of crime and incarceration (Hagan and Peterson 1995;Tonry 2022), and increasingly sophisticated demographic estimates documented these disparities and their consequences for economic activity and labor markets (Apel and Sweeten 2010;Holzer et al. 2005;Pager 2003;Pettit 2012;Pettit and Western 2004;Western 2006;Western and Beckett 199”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hagan and Peterson 1995 source
    • cites Tonry 2022 source

      Section I, “Patterns of Imprisonment Use,” documents striking differences in incarceration rates across countries, including a US rate more than 12 times Finland’s. The passages discuss rising crime rates but do not establish comparably disparate crime rates. The paper was published in 2022, so it also does not fit the sentence’s description of an early work. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    There is widespread (though still debated) agreement on when the mass incarceration era began in the United States because imprisonment rates are relatively easy to measure consistently over a long period of time at the national level.

    “Finally, there is widespread (though still debated) agreement on when the mass incarceration era began in the United States because imprisonment rates are relatively easy to measure consistently over a long period of time at the national level (but see Campbell 2018;Gottschalk 2006;Murakawa 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Campbell 2018 source
    • cites Gottschalk 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Murakawa 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Mass incarceration scholarship describes the fallout of a massive social change, but it is arguably limited with respect to how much it can identify the levers for change.

    “Mass incarceration scholarship describes the fallout of such a massive social change (see Lee et al. 2025), but it is arguably limited with respect to how much it can identify the levers for change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al. 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Black drivers were less likely to be stopped after sunset, i.e., more likely to be stopped during daytime hours when skin color is more apparent.

    “They also found that Black drivers were less likely to be stopped by police after sunset-or, put another way, more likely to be stopped during daytime hours when skin color is more readily apparent (Pierson et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pierson et al. 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Garland presents a view of US exceptionalism in penal state status by identifying unique features of American crime and punishment difficult to square with mass incarceration as a global phenomenon.

    “Regarding the first question, Garland (2013) presents a salient example of the view of US exceptionalism in penal state status by identifying unique features of American crime and punishment that are difficult to square with mass incarceration as a global phenomenon (see also Garland 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2013 source
    • cites Garland 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Other scholars add extreme conditions in US correctional facilities, very long sentences, and long-lasting consequences from low-level contact as unique features of the American penal state.

    “Other scholars might add the extreme conditions in US correctional facilities (Reiter 2016), very long sentences (Seeds 2021), and long-lasting consequences from seemingly low-level contact (Kohler-Hausmann 2013; Sugie and Turney 2017) as additional unique features of the American penal state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Reiter 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Seeds 2021 source
    • cites Kohler-Hausmann 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Compelling candidates for these external features are the American political economy and its racial politics, welfare retrenchment, and winner-take-all politics.

    “Compelling candidates are the American political economy and its racial politics (Beckett and Francis 2020), broad retrenchment of the welfare system (Beckett and Western 2001;Wacquant 2001Wacquant , 2009)), and the winner-take-all nature of the American political system (Garland 2023;Lacey 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
    • cites Beckett and Western 2001 source
    • cites Garland 2023 source

      Garland is cited for the winner-take-all nature of the American political system, rather than the preceding claims about racial politics or welfare retrenchment. The ‘America’s Political Economy’ section discusses a federal polity with multiple legislative veto points, but the passages found do not characterize its politics as winner-take-all (searched: ‘winner-take-all’ and ‘winner take all politics’). (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Many European scholars prefer the term penal state, presumably because it more accurately reflects common noncarceral criminal legal interventions there.

    “What makes the problem worse is that, as Rubin and Phelps note, many European scholars prefer the term penal state, presumably because it more accurately reflects the common noncarceral criminal legal interventions there.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rubin and Phelps 2017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    If incarceration rates indicate American exceptionalism, so too does its crime rate, especially with respect to violence.

    “If incarceration rates indicate American exceptionalism, so too does its crime rate, especially with respect to violence (Clegg et al. 2024;Garland 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clegg et al. 2024 source

      The Level section supports the violence-related point: using homicide to estimate serious crime, it questions whether US punishment is exceptional relative to other developed countries. But it also says police-recorded aggregate crime suggests the United States has about as much crime as other developed countries. The unqualified claim that its crime rate is exceptional therefore goes beyond the source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Garland 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Historically grounded works draw a tight criminalization throughline between colonialism, slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow, and mass criminalization today, while other narratives center racism but combine it with unique features of the American state and political economy.

    “One might contrast, for example, historically grounded works that draw a tight criminalization throughline between colonialism, slavery, reconstruction, Jim Crow, and mass criminalization today (Alexander 2012;Hinton and Cook 2021;Khan 2022;Muhammad 2019;Wacquant 2000) with narratives that center racism but combine it with unique features of the American state and political economy, including the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alexander 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hinton and Cook 2021 source
    • cites Khan 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    To deny that crime and disorder are substantial problems in the United States renders significant political and policy change vulnerable to slight upticks in the crime rate.

    “On the one hand, to deny that crime and disorder are substantial problems in the United States renders significant political and policy change vulnerable to slight upticks in the crime rate (Rizer 2023;Garland 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rizer 2023 source
    • cites Garland 2023 source

      In “America’s Political Economy” (page unavailable), Garland describes US violence and disorder as unusually high. In “Continuing Support for Policing and Punishment” (page unavailable), he says any sign of increasing crime can prompt a return to law-and-order policies. The paper does not say that denying the scale of crime and disorder is what makes reform vulnerable to that reversal. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Following slavery, cotton market collapses in the South and subsequent migration patterns put Black people in competition with White workers in the North.

    “Following slavery, cotton market collapses in the South and subsequent migration patterns put Black people in competition with White workers in the North.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Muller 2012 source
    • cites Muller 2021 source

      The 'When labor demand declines' section says the boll weevil substantially reduced southern cotton yields, and 'Migration' says Black migrants were forced into competition with northern workers. But the paper does not describe a cotton market collapse as the cause of migration; it identifies northern labor shortages and immigration restrictions as important causes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Incarceration during this period served an exclusionary function, and the incarceration rate of Black people subsequently increased.

    “Incarceration during this period served an exclusionary function, and the incarceration rate of Black people subsequently increased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Muller 2012 source
    • cites Muller 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    In Muller's work, the relative class positions of Black and White workers, variable demand for labor, exploitation via slavery, and exclusion via racist ideologies and market competition are integrated into a compelling narrative to explain both levels of incarceration and the relative size of racial disparities in them over time.

    “In this work, the relative class positions of Black and White workers, variable demand for labor, exploitation via slavery, and exclusion via racist ideologies and market competition are integrated into a compelling narrative to explain both levels of incarceration and the relative size of racial disparities in them over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Muller 2012 source
    • cites Muller 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    What sets the United States apart is that most other wealthy democracies pursued paths of shoring up their welfare states, increasing regulation of labor markets, and enhancing rights-based protections in the postwar period, while the United States largely did not.

    “What sets the United States apart is that most other wealthy democracies pursued paths of shoring up their welfare states, increasing regulation of labor markets, and enhancing rightsbased protections in the postwar period, while the United States largely did not (Garland 2023;Gottschalk 2008;Khan 2022;Thompson 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2023 source
    • cites Gottschalk 2008 source
    • cites Khan 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    For mass incarceration scholars, carceral state narratives offer a lesson in the pitfalls of ignoring crime and fear of crime.

    “For mass incarceration scholars, carceral state narratives offer a lesson in the pitfalls of ignoring crime and fear of crime (see also Sampson 2025, this issue).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sampson 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Engaging crime and punishment-and especially racial and ethnic disparities therein-simultaneously remains a central challenge in pursuit of reform and forms the foundations of mass criminalization in the first place.

    “Engaging crime and punishment-and especially racial and ethnic disparities therein-simultaneously remains a central challenge in pursuit of reform (given the long history of racialized politics that connect Blackness with criminality) and forms the foundations of mass criminalization in the first place (Alexander 2012;Beckett and Francis 2020;Hinton and Cook 2021;Muhammad 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alexander 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
    • cites Hinton and Cook 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Many countries have racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to incarceration, reflecting the history of historically marginalized groups in each country.

    “Many countries have racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to incarceration (Lacey et al. 2018;Tonry 2007Tonry , 2022)), reflecting the history of historically marginalized groups in each country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lacey et al. 2018 source
    • cites Tonry 2007 source
    • cites Tonry 2022 source

      The Abstract links racial bias and disparities in the United States to its history of race relations, and “C. Juxtaposing Punishment Philosophies and Expediency” reports racial disparities in US imprisonment. The paper also says national histories shape imprisonment practices, but the passages do not establish racial or ethnic disparities tied to historically marginalized groups across many countries. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    The penal system has long served in relation to market forces, and incarceration rates respond to shifts in labor demand in clear but complex ways.

    “The penal system has long served in relation to market forces, and incarceration rates respond to shifts in labor demand in clear but complex ways (Muller 2021;Wacquant 2009;Western and Beckett 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Muller 2021 source
    • cites Wacquant 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Western and Beckett 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Other institutions employ the logic of the carceral state, so one could reasonably conclude that the educational system, child welfare system, or health care system should also be included in any discussion of the expansion of the carceral state.

    “Other institutions employ the logic of the carceral state, as described earlier, so one could also reasonably conclude that the educational system (Haskins and Jacobsen 2017), the child welfare system (Fong 2023), or the health care system (Lara-Millán 2014), for example, should also be included in any discussion of the expansion of the carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haskins and Jacobsen 2017 source
    • cites Fong 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lara-Millán 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    The relative ease of each knowledge project is demonstrated by the presence of summaries of causes versus consequences in the literature.

    “The relative ease of each knowledge project is perhaps best demonstrated by the presence of summaries of causes versus consequences in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Abstract

    The US criminal legal system touches more people, with greater severity, for longer periods, and with greater consequence than any other wealthy Western democracy, even as US incarceration rates have receded from their mass incarceration peak.

    “As demonstrated throughout this issue, the US criminal legal system touches more people, with greater severity, for longer periods, and with greater consequence than any other wealthy Western democracy; this remains true even as US incarceration rates have receded from their mass incarceration peak.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Abstract

    Reviews that articulate causes, relative to consequences, are less in conversation with one another and grounded in a much broader body of work.

    “Perhaps reflecting their more interdisciplinary origins, reviews that articulate causes, relative to consequences, are less in conversation with one another and grounded in a much broader body of work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field and offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Abstract

    Reviews focused on the causes of mass incarceration or the rise of the carceral state demonstrate a distinct uptick in recent years.

    “Reviews focused on the causes of mass incarceration or the rise of the carceral state demonstrate a distinct uptick in recent years and presumably figure 1 represents an early stage of what may become a more prominent literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field and offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Reviews of the consequences of criminal legal system expansion dominate the space especially early on, and are more highly cited and more often in conversation with one another.

    “Reviews of the consequences of criminal legal system expansion dominate the spaceespecially early on-and are more highly cited and more often in conversation with one another, as indicated by their relative sizing in the figure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field and offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    Imprisonment rates peaked in about 2009 at 502 per 100,000 and have been slowly but steadily declining since then.

    “Imprisonment rates peaked in about 2009, when they were 502 per 100,000, and have been slowly but steadily declining since then (Carson 2023;West et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites West et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    Men are about fourteen times more likely than women to be incarcerated, as the imprisonment rate was 666 for men and 49 for women in 2022.

    “For example, men are about fourteen times more likely than women to be incarcerated, as the imprisonment rate was 666 for men and 49 for women in 2022 (Carson 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Crime

    The decline in crime rates is heterogeneous across demographic characteristics (including race and ethnicity, sex, and especially age) and geographic region.

    “Third, the decline in crime rates is heterogeneous across demographic characteristics (including race and ethnicity, sex, and especially age) and geographic region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Jail Incarceration

    Increases in jail incarceration rates exist across all counties but are most striking for rural counties.

    “These increases exist across all counties but are most striking for rural counties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Jail Incarceration

    The jail incarceration rate has decreased for all racial and ethnic groups since 1990, but the declines have been smallest for Black people (15 percent), followed by Native American people (28 percent), Asian American / Pacific Islander people (34 percent), Latinx people (47 percent), and White people (81 percent).

    “The jail incarceration rate has decreased for all racial and ethnic groups since 1990, but the declines have been smallest for Black people (declining by 15 percent between 1990 and 2022), followed by Native American people (28 percent decline), Asian American / Pacific Islander people (34 percent decline), Latinx people (47 percent decline), and White people (81 percent decline).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vera Institute of Justice 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Prison Incarceration

    Imprisonment rates have increased for all population groups over the past five decades, but there are stark disparities in rates across demographic characteristics.

    “Imprisonment rates have increased for all population groups over the past five decades, but there are stark disparities in rates across demographic characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Jail Incarceration

    Black people are more likely to be incarcerated than White people in rural counties and urban counties alike, but the inequalities are largest in rural counties.

    “Black people are more likely to be incarcerated than White people in rural counties and urban counties alike, but the inequalities are largest in rural counties (Vera Institute of Justice 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vera Institute of Justice 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    Though incarceration trends have been steadily declining over the past fifteen years, the contours of a prison sentence have changed.

    “Though incarceration trends have been steadily declining over the past fifteen years, the contours of a prison sentence have changed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    The imprisonment rate in 2022 was 355 out of 100,000 US residents, a 26 percent decrease from ten years prior.

    “The imprisonment rate in 2022 was 355 out of 100,000 US residents (a 26 percent decrease from ten years prior; Carson 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Jail Incarceration

    Jail incarceration rates, like prison incarceration rates, have increased dramatically since the 1970s.

    “Jail incarceration rates, like prison incarceration rates, have increased dramatically since the 1970s (see figure 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    The percentage decline in imprisonment rates between 2012 and 2022 is largest among Black people (34 percent decrease), followed by Hispanic people (32 percent), Asian people (31 percent), and White people (21 percent).

    “The percentage decline in imprisonment rates between 2012 and 2022 is largest among Black people (with a 34 percent decrease in rates), followed by Hispanic people (32 percent decrease), Asian people (31 percent decrease), and White people (21 percent).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Crime

    The timing of when the decline in crime rates begins (and the corresponding ending of the increase in crime rates) depends on the data being used to make inferences.

    “Second, the timing of when the decline in crime rates begins (and the corresponding ending of the increase in crime rates) depends on the data being used to make inferences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Crime

    Crime rates, including both violent crimes and property crimes, in the United States have declined even as rates of incarceration increased.

    “First, crime rates, including both violent crimes and property crimes, in the United States have declined (even as rates of incar-ceration increased).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Prison Incarceration

    Black people are more than twice as likely as Hispanic people to be incarcerated (imprisonment rates of 911 and 426 in 2022, respectively) and about five times as likely as White people to be incarcerated (911 and 188 in 2022, respectively).

    “Black people are more than twice as likely as Hispanic people to be incarcerated (with imprisonment rates of 911 and 426 in 2022, respectively) and about five times as likely as White people to be incarcerated (911 and 188 in 2022, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Jail Incarceration

    Rural counties had a jail incarceration rate of 55 per 100,000 in 1970, peaked at 362 in 2019, and declined slightly to 351 in 2022.

    “Rural counties had a jail incarceration rate of 55 per 100,000 in 1970, peaked at 362 in 2019, and declined slightly to 351 in 2022.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vera Institute of Justice 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Scholars who study the consequences of mass incarceration explicitly or implicitly anchor their work in the definition offered by David Garland.

    “Scholars who study the consequences of mass incarceration explicitly (or implicitly) anchor their work in the definition offered by the sociologist David Garland.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Shifting focus from consequences to function shifts the explanatory burden from measuring the potential effects of identified causes to the identification of potential causes of measured effects.

    “The problem, of course, is that this shifts the explanatory burden from measuring the potential effects of identified causes to the identification of potential causes of measured effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    There is relative uniformity in definitions of mass incarceration.

    “Consider, for example, the relative uniformity in definitions of mass incarceration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The potential influence of mass incarceration could be seen everywhere, with direct links to changes in American family life, the maintenance and reproduction of social inequality, and all manner of societal disengagement and civic disruption.

    “The potential influence of mass incarceration could now be seen everywhere, with direct links to changes in American family life (Lee and Wildeman 2021), the maintenance and reproduction of social inequality (National Research Council 2014;Pettit 2012;Wakefield and Uggen 2010;Western 2006), and all manner of societal disengagement and civic disruption (Brayne 2014;Weaver et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee and Wildeman 2021 source
    • cites National Research Council 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pettit 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract

    Moving from incarceration to other forms of criminal legal system contact-such as police contact and arrests-brought new insight into the origins of mass incarceration and renewed interest in historical change in systems of social control.

    “Moving from incarceration to other forms of criminal legal system contact-such as police contact and arrests-brought new insight into the origins of mass incarceration and renewed interest in historical change in systems of social control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    Scholarship on the development of carceral states or the determinants of penal policy offers the promise of greater understanding that might potentially be deployed in service of change.

    “In contrast, scholarship on the development of carceral states or the determinants of penal policy offers the promise of greater understanding that might potentially be deployed in service of change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    The scope and focus of Annual Review articles mirror how scholarship in the area developed.

    “The scope and focus of Annual Review articles mirror how scholarship in the area developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field and offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract

    For many scholars, the central difference is that the United States is a carceral state rather than simply a nation with high crime or punishment rates; it is principally defined by its unrelenting commitment to finding carceral solutions to all manner of social problems.

    “For many scholars, the central difference is that the United States is a carceral state rather than simply a nation with high crime or punishment rates; it is thus principally defined by its unrelenting commitment to finding carceral solutions to all manner of social problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    The article's contribution is a narrative about the very large gap between American rhetoric of a free, fair, and democratic country and the reality of enormously disparate contact with a very large criminal legal apparatus.

    “The contribution is ultimately a narrative about the very large gap between American rhetoric of a free, fair, and democratic country and the reality of enormously disparate contact with a very large criminal legal apparatus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    An explosion of scholarship expanded the domains under consideration, linking mass incarceration to dramatic shifts in the structure and functioning of American families and their communities.

    “An explosion of scholar-ship expanded the domains under consideration, linking mass incarceration to dramatic shifts in the structure and functioning of American families (Geller et al. 2011;Turney 2015;Wakefield and Wildeman 2013) and their communities (Clear 2007;Sampson and Loeffler 2010;Simes 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Geller et al. 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Turney 2015 source
    • cites Wakefield and Wildeman 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    While there is some conceptual slippage with respect to outcomes, the potential agent of change-mass incarceration or criminalization and the demographic concentration of each-is relatively clear and commonly understood.

    “Yet, importantly, while there is some conceptual slippage with respect to outcomes, the potential agent of change-mass incarceration or criminalization and the demographic concentration of each-is relatively clear and commonly understood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    A major complication in reviewing the rise of the carceral state is deciding what counts as relevant material.

    “Indeed, a major complication in reviewing the rise of the carceral state is simply deciding what counts (overarching theoretical perspectives?case studies?empirical tests of portions of broader theories?).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    Such a view has more recently been contested by scholars who argue that changes in the measurement of crime and incarceration offer different answers to the question of how much changes in the crime rate produced changes in the incarceration rate.

    “Such a view has more recently been contested by scholars who argue that changes in the measurement of crime and incarceration offer different answers to the question of how much changes in the crime rate produced changes in the incarceration rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Enns 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lacey et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Administrative definitions of race and ethnicity may not align with those of scholars of race and ethnicity nor are they error-free.

    “Furthermore, administrative definitions of race and ethnicity may not align with those of scholars of race and ethnicity nor are they error-free (Finlay et al. 2024;Vélez and Peguero 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Finlay et al. 2024 source
    • cites Vélez and Peguero 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    The boundaries of the carceral state area are relatively unclear and crosscut several disciplines.

    “Given the wide variation in carceral state narratives, as we call them, we necessarily highlight some over others (and surely omit some perspectives entirely) because the boundaries of the area are relatively unclear and crosscut several disciplines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Jail Incarceration

    Jail and prison incarceration share some commonalities, as both involve sustained contact with the criminal legal system, confinement, and, usually, eventual reintegration back into families and communities upon release.

    “Jail and prison incarceration share some commonalities, as both involve sustained contact with the criminal legal system, confinement, and, usually, eventual reintegration back into families and communities upon release.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Jail Incarceration

    Prisons house people convicted of a crime who have a sentence of at least one year.

    “Prisons house people convicted of a crime who have a sentence of at least one year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Jail Incarceration

    Jail and prison incarceration share some key differences and more broadly reflect the diffuse nature of criminal legal administration in the United States.

    “Jail and prison incarceration, though, share some key differences and more broadly reflect the diffuse na-ture of criminal legal administration in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Crime

    Crime rates in the United States have declined even as incarceration rates have risen.

    “it is well known that crime rates in the United States have declined even as incarceration rates have risen (see figure 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Crime

    Understanding trends in crime rates is critical for appreciating the growth of the carceral state in the United States, as the criminal legal system-including incarceration but also policing and supervision via probation and parole-is generally conceptualized as being responsive to crime.

    “Understanding trends in crime rates is critical for appreciating the growth of the carceral state in the United States, as the criminal legal system-including incarceration but also policing and supervision via probation and parole-is generally conceptualized as being responsive to crime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The criminal legal system is generally conceptualized as being responsive to crime.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Jail Incarceration

    Most work that examines incarceration trends exclusively considers prison incarceration or, less commonly, conflates jail and prison incarceration, likely an artifact of the data collection techniques and the surveys commonly used to study incarceration.

    “Most work that examines incarceration trends exclusively considers prison incarceration (Carson 2023;Pettit and Western 2004) or, less commonly, conflates jail and prison incarceration (Sawyer and Wagner 2023), likely an artifact of the data collection techniques and the surveys commonly used to study incarceration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carson 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Pettit and Western 2004 source
    • cites Sawyer and Wagner 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract

    The great variety of explanations and widespread conceptual disagreement across them preclude neat comparisons or strict tests of competing narratives.

    “At the same time, the great variety of explanations and widespread conceptual disagreement across them preclude neat comparisons (or even better, strict tests) of competing narratives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Definitions of race and ethnic difference are historically situated and fundamentally local such that the meaning and subsequent measurement of racial and ethnic boundaries varies substantially both across regions and within racial and ethnic groups, further complicating comparisons across time and place.

    “Last, definitions of race and ethnic difference are historically situated and fundamentally local such that the meaning (and subsequent measurement) of racial and ethnic boundaries varies substantially both across regions (Loveman 2014) and within racial and ethnic groups (Monk 2021), further complicating comparisons across time and place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Loveman 2014 source
    • cites Monk 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Jail Incarceration

    Jails are operated at the local (city or county) level, and prisons are operated at the state or federal levels.

    “Jails are operated at the local (city or county) level, and prisons are operated at the state or federal levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Crime

    The influence of crime on the trends described earlier is too often ignored and remains contested.

    “Much as scholarship on the consequences of incarceration in the mass incarceration era is relatively unconcerned with the causes of such high incarceration rates, the influence of crime on the trends described earlier is too often ignored and remains contested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Jail Incarceration

    Jails house people who have not been convicted of a crime (and are awaiting adjudication), people who have been convicted but are awaiting sentencing, and people who have been convicted of a crime and have received a short (usually less than one year) sentence.

    “Jails house people who have not been convicted of a crime (and are awaiting adjudication of their case via a trial or plea deal), people who have been convicted but are awaiting sentencing (and transfer to prison), and people who have been convicted of a crime and have received a short (usually less than one year) sentence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Prison Incarceration

    Large state variation in the most visible form of carceral state control (for example, incarceration) presents both challenges and opportunities for narratives that seek to define and explain the American carceral state.

    “Importantly for this review and an issue to which we will return in later sections, large state variation in the most visible form of carceral state control (for example, incarceration) presents both challenges and opportunities for narratives that seek to define and explain the American carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    The racial disparity in California traffic stops is largest in evening and early morning hours, and stops of Black drivers are less likely than stops of White or Latino drivers to lead to discovery of contraband or evidence.

    “The racial disparity in these traffic stops is largest in the evening and early morning hours and, importantly, stops of Black drivers are less likely than stops of White or Latino drivers to lead to the discovery of contraband or evidence (Lofstrom et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lofstrom et al. 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Age is also an important predictor of resident-initiated contact: 13% of people ages 35-44 report it, compared to 12% of 45-64, 10% of 25-44, and 9% of 65+.

    “Age is also an important predictor of resident-initiated contact, with 13 percent of people ages thirty-five to forty-four reporting it in the past year, compared to 12 percent of people ages forty-five to sixty-four, 10 percent of people ages twenty-five to forty-four, and 9 percent of people ages sixty-five and older (Tapp and Davis 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Age-standardized mortality rate from fatal police violence is about 2 times higher for non-Hispanic Black people than Hispanic people and nearly 4 times higher than non-Hispanic White people.

    “Data from three open-source databases (Fatal Encounters, Mapping Police Violence, and The Counted) show that the age-standardized mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black people is about two times higher than for Hispanic people and nearly four times higher than for non-Hispanic White people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites GBD 2019 Police Violence US Subnational Collaborators 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    These age-group trends are similar for White people, though overall rates are lower among White people than Black people across all age groups.

    “The authors report that these trends across age groups are similar for White people (though the overall rates are lower among White people compared to Black people across all age groups).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumer et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Age is an important predictor of police-initiated contact: about 17% of people ages 18-24 report it, compared to 12% of 25-44, 8% of 45-64, and 5% of 65+.

    “About 17 percent of people ages eighteen to twenty-four report police-initiated contact in the past year, compared to 12 percent of people ages twenty-five to forty-four, 8 percent of people ages forty-five to sixty-four, and 5 percent of people ages sixty-five and older (Tapp and Davis 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    Crime rates differ across geographic regions, with local context mattering especially in recent decades.

    “Additionally, crime rates differ across geographic regions of the country, with the local context mattering especially in recent decades (Baumer et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumer et al. 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    The PPCS findings on racial/ethnic disparities in police-initiated contact diverge from other research on police stops, perhaps because they do not consider type of contact or invasiveness.

    “These findings from the PPCS about racial and ethnic disparities in police-initiated contact diverge from other research on racial and ethnic disparities in police stops (and in criminal legal contact more generally), perhaps because they do not consider the type of police contact (traffic stops versus street stops) or the invasiveness of the stop.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Men were more likely than women to experience police-initiated contact (11% vs 9%), while women were more likely than men to initiate contact themselves (12% vs 11%).

    “Men were more likely than women to experience police-initiated contact (11 percent compared to 9 percent), whereas women were more likely than men to initiate contact themselves (12 percent compared to 11 percent; Tapp and Davis 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    In 2020, 3% of US residents ages 16+ reported contact related to a traffic accident.

    “and contact related to a traffic accident (3 percent; Tapp and Davis 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    NCVS data include self-reports of victimization, including crimes not reported to police, so they may be more inclusive.

    “NCVS data, which began annually in 1973, include respondents' selfreports of being the victim of criminal activity (including crimes that are and are not reported to the police), so they may be more inclusive (Baumer et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumer et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Fatal violence by police increased between 1980 and 2019 and is unequal across race and ethnicity.

    “Additionally, fatal violence by the police, which increased between 1980 and 2019, is unequal across race and ethnicity (GBD 2019 Police Violence US Subnational Collaborators 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites GBD 2019 Police Violence US Subnational Collaborators 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Crime

    UCR data include crimes reported to police, so changes in crime rates may result from changes in victimization, reporting, or both.

    “UCR data, which are the primary way that crime has been historically measured in the United States, include crimes that have been reported to the police (so changes in crime rates may result from changes in victimization, changes in reporting of victimization, or some combination of the two).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    Burglary rates increased until the early 1980s and then steadily declined through 2015.

    “Trends in burglaries show similar patterns, with burglary rates increasing until the early 1980s and then steadily declining through 2015 (Baumer et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumer et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    White people are more likely than Black or Hispanic people to experience police-initiated contact (10% vs 9% Black, 8% Hispanic) and resident-initiated contact (13% vs 9% for both Black and Hispanic).

    “Finally, these data show that White people are more likely than people of color to experience policeinitiated contact (10 percent compared to 9 per-cent of Black people and 8 percent of Hispanic people) and, similarly, that White people are more likely to experience resident-initiated contact (13 percent compared to 9 percent for both Black and Hispanic people; Tapp and Davis 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    In 2020, 10% of US residents ages 16+ reported police-initiated contact, compared to 11% in 2015 and 2018.

    “This includes contact initiated by the police, such as being stopped while in a motor vehicle or being stopped while on the street (10 percent of those ages sixteen and older in 2020, compared to 11 percent in 2015 and 2018);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tapp and Davis 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Crime

    Street crime began increasing in the 1960s, peaked in the early 1990s, and then declined.

    “it is generally accepted that street crime began increasing in the 1960s and then peaked in the early 1990s, when it started to decline (Blumstein and Rosenfeld 1998;Zimring 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Blumstein and Rosenfeld 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zimring 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Crime

    UCR data show increases in violent crime through the early 1990s and corresponding decreases after the early 1990s.

    “The UCR data show increases in violent crime through the early 1990s (and corresponding decreases in violent crime after the early 1990s).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Crime

    The NCVS violent crime data are reliable, as prior research found UCR homicide rate data highly correlated with other mortality records.

    “This suggests the reliability of the NCVS violent crime data, as prior research has found the UCR homicide rate data to be highly correlated with other mortality records (Lauritsen et al. 2016;O'Brien 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lauritsen et al. 2016 source
    • cites O'Brien 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Community supervision rates rapidly increased from the 1970s until about 2007 and have been declining since.

    “Community supervision rates rapidly increased from the 1970s until about 2007 and have been declining since then (Kaebel 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaebel 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Comparisons depend on one's benchmark; even US states with the lowest incarceration rates far exceed those of many other countries.

    “Even here the comparisons depend on one's benchmark; while it is the case that many US states have low incarceration rates relative to the within-country mean, even the US states with the lowest incarceration rates far exceed those of many other countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Americans with Felony Convictions

    The criminal legal system dramatically structures state-by-state variation across important social domains, to the extent that more punitive states have larger felony conviction populations and convictions are tied to voting and government assistance.

    “To the extent that more punitive states have larger populations with a felony conviction and such convictions are tied to things like the ability to vote (Uggen and Manza 2002;Weaver and Lerman 2010) or accessing various forms of government assistance (Mauer and Chesney-Lind 2002), the criminal legal system dramatically structures state-by-state variation across a host of important social domains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Uggen and Manza 2002 source
    • cites Weaver and Lerman 2010 source
    • cites Mauer and Chesney-Lind 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    The death penalty is available at the federal level in the US, but more often deployed by a small number of states, and many states have banned it.

    “While the death penalty is an available penalty at the federal level in the United States, it is more often deployed by a small number of states, and many states have banned it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    This view simply describes the US criminal legal system without reference to penal authority and stops short of adequately describing a carceral state.

    “This view, though, simply describes the US criminal legal system without reference to penal authority and stops short of adequately describing a carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    Probation has been seen as widening contact with the criminal legal system, often used as an alternative to incarceration and a mechanism for punishing misdemeanor/lower-level offenses.

    “Probation, especially, has been seen as a way of widening who comes into contact with the criminal legal system, as probation is often used as an alternative to incarceration and a mechanism for punishing those charged with misdemeanors or lower-level offenses who were never at risk of receiving a prison sentence (Phelps 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Phelps 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Americans with Felony Convictions

    The trends outlined earlier detail the core features of mass criminalization in the US.

    “The trends outlined earlier detail the core features of the mass criminalization that characterizes the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    About 15% of all adults ages 24-32 have been on probation, but nearly half (46%) of Black men in this age range without a high school diploma have experienced probation.

    “Research shows that about 15 percent of all adults ages twenty-four to thirty-two have been on probation but that nearly half (46 percent) of all Black men in this age range without a high school diploma have experienced probation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lerman and Weaver 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Analyses of the penal state are easier to reduce to clear, measurable, and testable concepts.

    “In this review, we largely conclude that analyses of the penal state-or the analysis of state capacity vis-à-vis penal policy and practiceare easier to reduce to clear, measurable, and testable concepts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Americans with Felony Convictions

    A clear and widely agreed-upon definition of a carceral state does not exist in the literature.

    “However, a clear and widely agreed-upon definition of a carceral state does not exist in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state scholarship is in broad agreement that features producing the US criminal legal system are found outside that system, though narratives differ on which features are most important.

    “Recall that carceral state scholarship is in broad agreement that the features that produce the sort of criminal legal system represented in the United States are found outside of that system, though narratives differ with respect to what features are considered most important.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Definitions of carceral/penal states range from a narrow focus on prisons and jails to a broader set of criminal legal agencies including parole and probation.

    “The definitions in table 1 range from a narrow focus on agencies that incarcerate-prisons and jailsto a broader set of criminal legal agencies, including parole and probation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state narratives focused on extreme features of the criminal legal system would lead to the position that the US stands alone in carceral state status.

    “In general, carceral state narratives focused on extreme features of the criminal legal system would lead one to the position that the United States stands alone with respect to its carceral state status (Lacey 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lacey 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    In 2020, nearly 4 million US adults were under community supervision, a more than 20% decline from the 2007 peak of more than 5.1 million.

    “In 2020, nearly four million US adults were under community supervision, a more than 20 percent decline from the peak in 2007, when more than 5.1 million US adults were under community supervision (Glaze and Bonczar 2011;Kaebel 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Glaze and Bonczar 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kaebel 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    It is often unclear what is included and excluded in the carceral part of the carceral state description.

    “It is often unclear what is included and excluded in the carceral part of the carceral state description; as Aisha Khan (2022, 54) explains in the Annual Review of Anthropology:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khan 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    A vision of the US as a carceral state is most intellectually satisfying at the nation level, where the US emerges as extreme on many metrics.

    “A vision of the United States as a carceral state tends to be the most intellectually satisfying when one makes criminal legal system comparisons at the nation level; in these comparisons, the United States emerges as extreme on many metrics, and other institutions take center stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Garland notes the American system is defined by use of death penalty long after abolished elsewhere, large populations under community supervision, and volume of collateral consequences of felony conviction.

    “In addition to high rates of incarceration and extreme racial and ethnic disproportionality in its use (both are observed elsewhere), Garland notes that the American system is defined by its use of the death penalty long after it was abolished elsewhere, the large populations of US residents under correctional supervision in their communities, and the sheer volume of formal and informal collateral”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Narratives of the rise of the carceral state differ dramatically in emphasis.

    “Given these differences, it is unsurprising that narratives of the rise of the carceral state differ dramatically in emphasis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Police, Probation, and Parole

    There is state-level variation in community supervision punitiveness, and this variation does not necessarily track state-level variation in incarceration.

    “Additionally, there is state-level variation, with some states having more punitive community supervision than others (and, interestingly, this state-level variation in supervision does not necessarily track onto state-level variation in incarceration (Phelps 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Phelps 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Such penal state conceptualizations risk missing the forest for the trees and may be too narrow to be of great use.

    “The trade-off, of course, is that such conceptualizations run the risk of missing the proverbial forest for the trees and may be rendered too narrow to be of great use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Some definitions include adjacent agencies and institutions (e.g., child welfare, schools, hospitals) that aid criminal legal system goals or adopt carceral logics.

    “Still others move well beyond the criminal legal system field to include adjacent agencies and institutions that aid criminal legal system goals, steer people toward criminal legal system contact, or adopt similar carceral logics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Sentencing practices and collateral consequences vary substantially across states.

    “Sentencing practices and collateral consequences also vary substantially across states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    A broadened conception of carceral state risks seeing it everywhere and rendering the concept meaningless.

    “A broadened conception of the carceral state runs the risk of seeing it everywhere and rendering the concept meaningless in the process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Americans with Felony Convictions

    There is little agreement on what is included or excluded from the term carceral state, and no definition approaches Garland's description of mass incarceration.

    “There is certainly no definition of a carceral state that approaches the Garland description of mass incarceration discussed earlier and, making matters worse, little agreement on what is included or excluded from the term.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Whether the US stands alone as a carceral state depends on theoretical orientation and available comparisons.

    “Answering the second question-whether the United States stands alone as a carceral state-depends on both theoretical orientation and the complexities imposed by available comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    There is little agreement on what is included and excluded in the carceral state analytical field, and several definitions include overlapping domains, actors, or organizations.

    “As shown in the table and confirmed in our own review of the literature, there is little agreement on what is included and excluded in the carceral state analytical field, and several definitions include overlapping domains, actors, or organizations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Conceptual ambiguity makes it difficult to answer seemingly basic questions.

    “Conceptual ambiguity as described earlier makes it difficult to answer seemingly basic questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Americans with Felony Convictions

    Scholars differ dramatically in how they define the penal or carceral state.

    “As we hinted at earlier and describe in more detail later, scholars differ (often dramat-ically) in how they define the penal or, more recently, carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Dan Berger distinguishes penal and carceral states by arguing carceral state is broader, encompassing more institutions and a longer timescale than penal state.

    “In contrast, historian Dan Berger (2019) distinguishes more clearly between penal and carceral states by arguing that carceral state is the broader term, encompassing more institutions and a longer timescale than the more narrow term penal state (see also Foucault 1995;Hernández et al. 2015;Simon 2007a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berger 2019 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Conceptualizing the Carceral State

    Narratives in carceral state space agree that foundations of mass incarceration are found outside the penal system proper, so penal state frame may be too narrow.

    “Narratives in the carceral state space, for example, are in relative agreement that the foundations of mass incarceration are found outside (often far outside) the penal system proper, so the many variants of the penal state frame may prove too narrow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    The carceral state literature is largely grounded in the notion that the United States represents an ideal type of a carceral state, though analysts differ on what features make this so.

    “The first question is more easily answered than the second; the carceral state literature is largely grounded in the notion that the United States represents an ideal type of a carceral state, though analysts largely differ on what features of it make this so (a point we return to later).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    A common theme of carceral state arguments is that they reframe the most proximate causes of mass incarceration as a symptom of earlier events or other underlying causes.

    “As we will discuss, a common theme of carceral state arguments is that they reframe the most proximate causes of mass incarceration as a symptom of earlier events or other underlying causes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Wacquant, Alexander, Gottshalk, and Murakawa view crime as less relevant for understanding current carceral practices, highlight how fear of crime rather than actual crime rates drives punitive policy, or worry about how engaging crime influences support for criminal legal system reform.

    “These views can be contrasted with those of Wacquant (2009;2000) as well as with those of Michelle Alexander (2012), Marie Gottshalk (2006), andNaomi Murakawa (2019), who view crime as less relevant for understanding current carceral practices, highlight how fear of crime rather than actual crime rates drives punitive policy, or worry about how engaging crime-in particular racial and ethnic”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wacquant 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Alexander 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gottshalk 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    High rates of crime and punishment are difficult to tackle simultaneously without making racial disparities in punishment worse because mass incarceration resulted from racialized politics that developed partially in response to increases in crime or fear of crime.

    “It also explains why high rates of crime and punishment are so difficult to tackle simultaneously without making racial disparities in punishment worse; this is so because mass incarceration resulted from the racialized politics that developed partially in response to increases in crime (or fear of crime).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    No Western democracy has reached the high levels of criminal legal interventions of the US, but the pathway pursued in the US is still found in other places.

    “While no Western democracy has reached the high levels of criminal legal system interventions of the United States, the pathway pursued in the United States is still found in other places.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    The narratives of carceral state origins described in the review are often broadly complementary despite scholarly disagreements.

    “While scholars in the carceral state space have disagreements about the importance of, say, crime rates, neoliberalism, or the role of social liberals in the advent of the prison boom, the narratives we will describe are often broadly complementary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Perspectives emphasizing historical power relations lend credence to the idea that the US extreme exists along a broader continuum but offer different peers and explanatory factors.

    “Perspectives that emphasize historical power relations in the United States with respect to its repressive criminal legal system lend credence to the idea that the US extreme exists along a broader continuum but serve up an altogether different set of potential peers and explanatory factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Figuring out which policy changes were most consequential for increasing the incarceration rate is no easy task.

    “Increases in the incarceration rate are fairly transparently linked to sentencing policy changes, and figuring out which policy changes were most consequential is no easy task (Blumstein and Beck 1999;Bushway 2011;National Research Council 2014;Neal and Armin 2023;Raphael and Stoll 2009;Spelman 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blumstein and Beck 1999 source
    • cites Bushway 2011 source
    • cites National Research Council 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Incarceration rates track violent crime rates more closely than previously recognized.

    “Nicola Lacey and colleagues point to more recent analyses showing that incarceration rates track violent crime rates more closely than previously recognized (2018,200) and highlight the work of political scientist Peter K. Enns (2016), who argues that political elites did not impose concerns about crime on ordinary citizens merely to achieve political ends; rather, such concerns were widely shared”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lacey et al. 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    To the degree that the US is especially unregulated, decentralized, and unsupportive of labor, we might expect extreme incarceration rates there but observe similar trajectories in other nations sharing these characteristics in kind but not degree.

    “Here again, the interpretation depends on one's benchmark; to the degree that the United States is especially unregulated, especially decentralized, and especially unsupportive of labor, we might expect extreme incarceration rates there but observe similar trajectories in other nations that share these characteristics in kind but not necessarily degree.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Others argue that crime is central to understanding the determinants of penal policy and mass incarceration, though for different reasons than those Garland raises.

    “Others argue that crime is central to understanding the determinants of penal policy and mass incarceration, though for different reasons than those Garland raises (Lacey et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lacey et al. 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state narratives implicitly distinguish between describing the criminal legal system as a pathological form of social control and better understanding the function of this latest form of pathological social control.

    “This simple premise leads to another shared premise of carceral state narratives: carceral state narratives implicitly distinguish between describing the criminal legal system as a pathological form of social control and better understanding the function of this latest form of pathological social control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Understanding the origins of the carceral state requires explicitly asking why carceral solutions were so doggedly pursued in the United States, relative to similarly situated nations that struggled with high crime rates but pursued solutions within and outside their criminal legal systems.

    “It also requires explicitly asking why carceral solutions were so doggedly pursued in the United States, relative to similarly situated nations that struggled with high crime rates but pursued solutions within and outside their criminal legal systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state explanations share a common view that mass criminalization is a consequence of broader political and social dynamics, rather than a simple consequence of shifts in crime or criminal justice policy.

    “Such explanations may differ widely-locating causes in the political dynamics of the 1970s to as far back as the founding of the country-but they share a common view that mass criminalization is a consequence of broader political and social dynamics, rather than a simple consequence of shifts in crime or criminal justice policy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Enns argues that concerns about crime were widely shared among the public, including among Black Americans, rather than imposed by political elites merely to achieve political ends.

    “Nicola Lacey and colleagues point to more recent analyses showing that incarceration rates track violent crime rates more closely than previously recognized (2018,200) and highlight the work of political scientist Peter K. Enns (2016), who argues that political elites did not impose concerns about crime on ordinary citizens merely to achieve political ends; rather, such concerns were widely shared”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Enns 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state narratives describe mass incarceration as a new form of social control that serves a much older function and reflects fundamental state dynamics.

    “Instead, carceral state narratives describe mass incarceration as a new form of social control that serves a much older function and reflects fundamental state dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Higher crime rates in the 1960s and early 1970s are important for understanding the initial rise in incarceration, but this is so because of politicized shifts in policy.

    “Higher crime rates in the 1960s and early 1970s are important for understanding the initial rise in incarceration, but this is so because of politicized shifts in policy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Explanations for the rise of the carceral state differ in points of emphasis but raise common questions about the unique features of the political, economic, and social structure of life in the United States.

    “Explanations for the rise of the carceral state differ in points of emphasis but raise common questions about the unique features of the political, economic, and social structure of life in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Crime is central to Katherine Beckett and colleagues' work on racial capitalism, the politicization of crime, and the development of the carceral state.

    “As a useful contrast to the tails of the distribution described earlier, crime is central to Katherine Beckett and colleagues' insightful work on racial capitalism, the politicization of crime, and the development of the carceral state (Beckett 1997;2018;Beckett and Francis 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beckett 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state frameworks emphasize the state portion of the term and locate the causes of the prison boom in dynamics outside the criminal legal system.

    “First, carceral state frameworks emphasize the state portion of the term and locate the causes of the prison boom in dynamics outside the criminal legal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    For Lacey and colleagues, Enns, Forman, and others, crime is central to understanding current criminal legal system practice.

    “For Lacey and colleagues, Enns (2016), Forman (2017), and others, crime is central to understanding current criminal legal system practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lacey et al. 2018 source
    • cites Enns 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Forman 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Perspectives that take crime seriously ask when crime matters.

    “Perspectives along these lines instead ask when crime matters (Alexander 2012;Beckett 1997;Beckett and Francis 2020;Murakawa 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Alexander 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Understanding the origins of the carceral state requires understanding why policy changed so substantially rather than identifying which policy changes mattered most for increasing the incarceration rate.

    “Understanding the origins of the carceral state requires understanding why policy changed so substantially rather than identifying which policy changes mattered most for increasing the incarceration rate (and decreasing the incarceration rate, albeit on a smaller scale).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Carceral state explanations are commonly comparative in nature and must grapple with the nature of crime in the United States.

    “Carceral state explanations are commonly comparative in nature (why is the United States so extreme relative to other comparators?), and such explanations must grapple with the nature of crime in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    To the degree that explanations for the US criminal legal system are grounded in racial capitalism or histories of racial subjugation and settler-colonialism, the US becomes another nation grounded in repression of portions of the population.

    “To the degree that explanations for the US criminal legal system are grounded in racial capitalism (Baptist 2017;Beckett and Francis 2020) or histories of racial subjugation ( Alexander 2012; Muhammad 2019; Muller 2021) and settler-colonialism (Hernández 2017; Khan 2022; Nichols 2014), the United States becomes yet another nation grounded in the repression of portions of the population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baptist 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
    • cites Alexander 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    In Beckett and colleagues' analysis, the importance of crime for understanding the origins of the carceral state is less about the crime rate per se and more about how political actors used spikes in crime to achieve other political goals.

    “The importance of crime for understanding the origins of the carceral state in Beckett and colleagues' analysis is less about the crime rate per se and more about how political actors in the United States used spikes in crime in the run-up to the prison boom to achieve other political goals (but see Enns 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Enns 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Taking crime and fear of crime seriously need not rule out the role of politics or structural racism.

    “Taking crime and, importantly, fear of crime seriously need not rule out the role of politics or structural racism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    The role of crime rates-or racial and ethnic disparities in offending and victimization rates-ranges from relatively ignored to centrally important for understanding mass criminalization in carceral state narratives.

    “The role of crime rates-or, more specifically, racial and ethnic disparities in offending and victimization rates-ranges from relatively ignored to centrally important for understanding mass criminalization in carceral state narratives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Crime takes center stage in most carceral state frames, albeit in complex ways, and is typically focused on why the country's response to crime has been centrally located within the penal system rather than tackled in conjunction with alternatives outside it.

    “Crime takes center stage in most carceral state frames, albeit in complex ways, and is typically focused on why this country's response to crime has been centrally located within the penal system rather than tackled in conjunction with the many available alternatives outside it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    For Garland, to ignore that the United States is a violent place relative to other wealthy Western democracies is both plainly incorrect and renders any explanation of the rise of the carceral state incomplete.

    “For Garland, to ignore that the United States is a violent place relative to other wealthy Western democracies is both plainly incorrect and renders any explanation of the rise of the carceral state incomplete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Comparisons to other Western democracies show the US is extreme on criminal legal interventions while sharing some structural features of capitalist democratic states.

    “Comparisons to other Western democracies make clear that the United States is extreme on criminal legal system interventions while sharing some structural features of capitalist democratic states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    A recent National Academy of Sciences report on racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system anchors its analysis on both crime and punishment as central problems for marginalized populations in the United States.

    “Finally, a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences on racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system anchors its analysis on both crime and punishment as central problems for marginalized populations in the United States, underscoring the need to account for and address both (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    What unites carceral state perspectives is that effective and rational responses to crime are not a core feature of the American carceral state.

    “What unites carceral state perspectives is that effective and rational responses to crime are not a core feature of the American carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    That the origins of the carceral state are intimately bound up with a brutal legacy of racial subjugation, segregation, and anti-Black sentiment is common across all origin stories.

    “That the origins of the carceral state are intimately bound up with a brutal legacy of racial subjugation, segregation, and anti-Black sentiment is common across all origin stories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Recalling that crime rates rose in many wealthy Western democracies in the 1960s and 1970s is of great importance but does not explain why the United States pursued carceral solutions to the exclusion of all others.

    “Recalling that crime rates rose in many wealthy Western democracies in the 1960s and 1970s is of great importance but does not explain why the United States pursued carceral solutions to the exclusion of all others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Current research documents declining racial and ethnic disparities in incarceration, largely due to increasing rates among Whites.

    “Such historical work can also offer insight into contemporary patterns; current research documents declining racial and ethnic disparities in incarceration, largely due to increasing rates among Whites (Robey et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robey et al. 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    These distinctions reflect disagreement about whether crime rates are foundational to the carceral state but also represent more pragmatic concerns about how to address racial and ethnic bias within the criminal legal system without making them worse.

    “These distinctions reflect disagreement about whether crime rates are foundational to the carceral state but also represent more pragmatic concerns about how to address racial and ethnic bias within the criminal legal system without making them worse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    This history is critical to understanding contemporary racial and ethnic bias, but carceral state explanations differ with respect to how researchers combine this feature of American race relations with other characteristics of the American state to understand contemporary mass criminalization.

    “This history is critical to understanding contemporary racial and ethnic bias, but carceral state explanations differ with respect to how researchers combine this feature of American race relations with other characteristics of the American state to understand contemporary mass criminalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    The distinctions and disagreements between carceral state origins stories are less about how much legacies of slavery or contemporary racism matter for understanding today's mass criminalization and more about what other features of the United States distinguish it from other wealthy countries across the globe.

    “As with crime, the distinctions and disagreements between carceral state origins stories are less about how much legacies of slavery or contemporary racism matter for understanding today's mass criminalization and more about what other features of the United States distinguish it from other wealthy countries across the globe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Explanations for the development of the carceral state are necessarily comparative.

    “Throughout this article, we have noted that explanations for the development of the carceral state are necessarily comparative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Few scholars deny that crime is an important social problem to address.

    “The perspectives on crime that we have reviewed represent intriguing theoretical and conceptual distinctions, but few scholars deny that crime is an important social problem to address.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Scholars disagree on how much or in what ways to center crime rates in understanding the origins of the carceral state, and they also differ about how crime rates influence support for criminal justice reform and inform strategies for reforming the criminal legal system.

    “Finally, just as scholars disagree on how much or in what ways to center crime rates in understanding the origins of the carceral state, they also differ about how crime rates influence support for criminal justice reform and inform strategies for reforming the criminal legal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Ignoring crime within these perspectives is akin to ignoring a major cause of the racial and ethnic biases so observable in the US criminal legal system today.

    “Ignoring crime within these perspectives is akin to ignoring a major cause of the racial and ethnic biases so observable in the US criminal legal system today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    Case studies like Muller's offer one example of the utility of combining the long history of racial subjugation in the United States with other features of the American state and political economy.

    “Case studies like this offer one example of the utility of combining the long history of racial subjugation in the United States with other features of the American state and political economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    These disparities are often smaller in other places, and when coupled with the racialized nature of all forms of social control and surveillance in the United States, exceptionalism in the United States with respect to historical forms of racial subjugation appears clear.

    “These disparities are often smaller in other places, however, and when coupled with the racialized nature of all forms of social control and surveillance in the United States, exceptionalism in the United States with respect to historical forms of racial subjugation appears clear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    Centering crime risks distracting from the essential point that both crime and punishment are generally high for a host of reasons that have little to do with the criminal legal system.

    “On the other hand, centering crime risks distracting from the essential point that both crime and punishment are generally high for a host of reasons that have little to do with the criminal legal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    This also has much in common with contemporary research that links incarceration to trends in the unemployment rate and broader labor demands.

    “This also has much in common with contemporary research that links incarceration to trends in the unemployment rate and broader labor demands (Sutton 2004;Wacquant 2000;Western and Beckett 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sutton 2004 source
    • cites Wacquant 2000 source
    • cites Western and Beckett 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    A choice between the carceral state as a racist system and crime driving everything represents a dangerous and false dichotomy.

    “Indeed, a choice between the carceral state as a racist system and crime driving everything represents a dangerous and false dichotomy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    In this view, mass incarceration is the result of the racialized politics that emerged in response to the civil rights movement.

    “In this view, mass incarceration (and presumably the mass criminalization that followed) is the result of the racialized politics that emerged in response to the civil rights movement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    One need not ignore crime while understanding a criminal legal system that has long been utterly rife with racism.

    “The lesson of the National Academies report, as well as the debates described earlier about the centrality of crime for understanding punishment, is that one need not ignore crime while understanding a criminal legal system that has long been utterly rife with racism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Racial Subjugation, the Aftermath of Slavery, Settler Colonialism, and Contemporary Racism

    The principal distinction across arguments about the origins of the carceral state concerns whether slavery and its aftermath (or racism more broadly) are a fundamental cause of the rise of the carceral state or whether this history is an aggravating factor when combined with other unique features of the American state.

    “The principal distinction across arguments about the origins of the carceral state concerns whether slavery and its aftermath (or racism more broadly) are a fundamental cause of the rise of the carceral state or whether this history is an aggravating factor when combined with other unique features of the American state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Analytical Challenges from Conceptual Ambiguity

    An overfocus on crime is counterproductive for reform and distracts from the core foundations of mass incarceration.

    “If that is the case, an overfocus on crime is counterproductive for reform and distracts from the core foundations of mass incarceration (Beckett 1997(Beckett , 2018;;Beckett and Francis 2020;Beckett and Murakawa 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beckett 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Wacquant emphasizes the rise of neoliberalism specifically-the devotion to free market capitalism and limited regulation achieved through technocratic privatization of public services and the politics of austerity-and its relation to the prison boom.

    “The sociologist Loïc Wacquant (2009;see also Gilmore 2007;Khan 2022;Simon 2007b), for example, emphasizes the rise of neoliberalism specifically-that is, the devotion to free market capitalism and limited regulation achieved through technocratic privatization of public services and the politics of austerity (Harvey 2005)-and its relation to the prison boom.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wacquant 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gilmore 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Khan 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    In both schools and child protective services, the spread of the carceral state is apparent but the connections remain unclear.

    “In both instances, the spread of the carceral state is apparent but the connections remain unclear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    The introduction of police in schools, technological advancements to surveil students, and increasingly punitive and racialized school discipline policies mirror the dynamics observed in the criminal legal system and reflect the spread of an overreliance on punitive control policies in response to social problems.

    “The introduction of police in schools, technological advancements to surveil students, and increasingly punitive and racialized school discipline policies mirror the dynamics observed in the criminal legal system and reflect the spread of an overreliance on punitive control policies in response to social problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Lacking social services, worker protections, or living wages, the carceral system serves as an alternative to low-wage work and props up an economic system primarily based on exploitation.

    “Lacking social services, worker protections, or living wages, the carceral system serves as an alternative to low-wage work and props up an economic system primarily based on exploitation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    The shadow carceral state includes punitive family courts, the criminalization of the immigration system, and a rapidly expanding and predatory monetary sanctions administrative regime that produces destabilizing consequences even from relatively minimal contact with the criminal legal system or its adjacent agencies.

    “They offer examples ranging from punitive family courts, the criminalization of the immigration system (Ryo et al. 2025, this issue), and a rapidly expanding and predatory monetary sanctions administrative regime that produces destabilizing consequences even from relatively minimal contact with the criminal legal system or its adjacent agencies (Friedman and Pattillo 2019;Harris 2016;Harris et al.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Murakawa 2012 source
    • cites Ryo et al. 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Friedman and Pattillo 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Given these structural conditions, it is unsurprising that prisons are filled with poor people unable to make a living wage in an unregulated labor market or that the crime rate is relatively high.

    “Moreover, given these structural conditions, it is unsurprising that prisons are filled with poor people unable to make a living wage in an unregulated labor market or that the crime rate is relatively high.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Carceral state narratives differ with respect to what follows from the decline of the welfare state over the course of the twentieth century, but they align insofar as shifts in the political economy are what allow race and class disparities in the criminal legal system to flourish.

    “Carceral state narratives differ with respect to what follows from the decline of the welfare state over the course of the twentieth century, but they align insofar as shifts in the political economy are what allow race and class disparities in the criminal legal system to flourish.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Beckett's book and later works describe how realignment across political parties after the Civil War and the civil rights movement created a problem for Republicans: how could they make up for having lost the support of Black Americans?

    “Beckett's book and later works (Beckett and Francis 2020; see also Schoenfeld 2018) describe how realignment across political parties after the Civil War and the civil rights movement created a problem for Republicans: how could they make up for having lost the support of Black Americans?”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Francis 2020 source
    • cites Schoenfeld 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    The United States, which is so often described as extreme with respect to the control and surveillance practiced within the criminal legal system, can also be contrasted with virtually every other wealthy country in terms of its lack of protection and support for vulnerable residents.

    “Ironically, the United States, which is so often described as extreme with respect to the control and surveillance practiced within the criminal legal system, can also be contrasted with virtually every other wealthy country in terms of its lack of protection and support for vulnerable residents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Other carceral state scholars focus more intently on the political apparatus required to maintain an austere free market economy in such a wealthy nation.

    “Other carceral state scholars focus more intently on the political apparatus required to maintain an austere free market economy in such a wealthy nation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The administrative shadow of the carceral state and a culture increasingly oriented toward social control spread the carceral state still further, creating a 'culture of control' and 'governed through crime' that now characterizes contexts and institutions with seemingly little relation to the criminal legal system.

    “The administrative shadow of the carceral state and a culture increasingly oriented toward social control spread the carceral state still further, creating a “culture of control” (Garland 2002) “governed through crime” (Simon 2007b) that now characterizes contexts and institutions with seemingly little relation to the criminal legal system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2002 source
    • cites Simon 2007b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Even the much-touted gains of the civil rights movement in the United States produced such a backlash that scholars view the ensuing politicization of crime in service of racialized ends as foundational to the development of the carceral state.

    “Even the much-touted gains of the civil rights movement in the United States produced such a backlash that scholars view the ensuing politicization of crime in service of racialized ends as foundational to the development of the carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    The political economy of prison building is associated with racial and economic disadvantage but is broadly bipartisan, reflecting the expansion of carceral state politics across the political spectrum.

    “John Eason and colleagues (2024) find that the political economy of prison building is associated with racial and economic disadvantage but is broadly bipartisan, reflecting the expansion of carceral state politics across the political spectrum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eason et al. 2024 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Because the American state has high levels of race and class inequality, extreme segregation, and few alternatives for assistance in a crisis, it arguably depends on the prison to maintain its current state.

    “Because the American state has high levels of race and class inequality, extreme segregation, and few alternatives for assistance in a crisis (Raphael and Stoll 2009), it arguably depends on the prison to maintain its current state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raphael and Stoll 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Carceral state narratives document how the decline of the welfare state, racism and segregation, class divisions, and the hyperlocal racialized politics that characterize the United States create the conditions for a carceral state.

    “Carceral state narratives document how the decline of the welfare state, racism and segregation, class divisions, and the hyperlocal racialized politics that characterize the United States create the conditions for a carceral state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    Child protection workers act as surveillance agents that pose a threat to families and may steer some toward the criminal legal system.

    “describing child protection workers as surveillance agents that pose a threat to families and may steer some toward the criminal legal system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Edwards 2016 source
    • cites Fong 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    The strategy increased support for Republicans in the 1970s and beyond.

    “The strategy increased support for Republicans in the 1970s and beyond.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    Katherine Beckett and Naomi Murakawa describe a 'shadow carceral state' where the practices and powers common to police, courts, or correctional agencies are now wielded by adjacent institutions.

    “Katherine Beckett and Naomi Murakawa elegantly describe a “shadow carceral state” where the practices and powers common to police, courts, or correctional agencies are now wielded by adjacent institutions (Beckett and Murakawa 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Murakawa 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Importation of Carceral Logic to Seemingly Unrelated Institutions

    The relation of school punitive practices to the development of a carceral state remains unclear.

    “the relation of all this to the development of a carceral state remains unclear.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    Their solution was to implement the so-called Southern strategy, which appealed to Southern Whites specifically because of their racial grievances and to the broader population because of the backlash to the civil rights movement and social upheaval of the 1960s.

    “Their solution was to implement the so-called Southern strategy, which appealed to Southern Whites specifically because of their racial grievances and to the broader population because of the backlash to the civil rights movement and social upheaval of the 1960s.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Politics, Political Economy, and the Decline of the Welfare State

    The United States deregulated markets and hollowed out worker protections and social support for vulnerable citizens.

    “Instead, the United States deregulated markets and hollowed out worker protections and social support for vulnerable citizens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Increased school surveillance and punitive policies pair well with Beckett and Murakawa's conception of a shadow carceral state but stop well short of the 'legally liminal authority' that characterizes immigration courts or civil commitment hearings.

    “we see that increased school surveillance and punitive policies pair well with Beckett and Murakawa's conception of a shadow carceral state but stop well short of the “legally liminal authority” that characterizes immigration courts or civil commitment hearings (2012,222).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Murakawa 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Information about the carceral experience across countries is not widely or systematically available, leaving the true nature of country-level disparities-and explanations of these disparities-unknown.

    “Information about the carceral experience across countries is not widely or systematically available, leaving the true nature of country-level disparities-and explanations of these disparitiesunknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The proximate causes of the growth in punishment-changes to policing practices, sentencing policy, or correctional operations-remain contested even though they are much more easily measured relative to the unique aspects of the US political economy or its long history of racial subjugation and segregation.

    “The proximate causes of the growth in punishment-changes to policing practices, sentencing policy, or correctional operations-remain contested even though they are much more easily measured relative to, say, the unique aspects of the US political economy or its long history of racial subjugation and segregation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world.

    “It is commonly reported that the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world (Tonry 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tonry 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Understanding the United States as a carceral state, rather than as a nation that merely has high incarceration rates, expands knowledge by broadening the analytic landscape.

    “understanding the United States as a carceral state, rather than as a nation that merely has high incarceration rates, expands knowledge by broadening the analytic landscape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The fragmented and dispersed nature of data on jail incarceration precludes a robust and national accounting of the causes and consequences of this form of criminal legal contact.

    “The fragmented and dispersed nature of data on jail incarceration precludes a robust and national accounting of the causes and consequences of this form of criminal legal contact”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Jail incarceration is the most common and unequally distributed form of incarceration in the United States.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    A system designed to keep children out of trouble has played a greater role in steering them toward the attention of the criminal legal system, in ways that mirror the racial and ethnic disparities of the criminal legal system.

    “Thus, a system that, on its face at least, is designed to keep children out of trouble has played a greater role in steering them toward the attention of the criminal legal system (and does so in ways that mirror the racial and ethnic disparities of the criminal legal system).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Many scholars would argue that a full understanding of the carceral state involves additional characteristics including legal financial obligations, solitary confinement, length of sentences, and conditions of confinement.

    “Many would also argue that a full understanding of the carceral state involves additional characteristics of the criminal legal system, including legal financial obligations (Harris 2016), solitary confinement (Reiter 2016), length of sentences (Mauer and Nellis 2018), and (often brutal) conditions of confinement (Wildeman et al. 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Harris 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reiter 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mauer and Nellis 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The high incarceration rates in the United States are a defining feature of the country, but the scope and extent of the carceral state go beyond incarceration.

    “The high incarceration rates in the United States are, to be sure, a defining feature of the country, but the scope and extent of the carceral state go beyond incarceration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The structural and cultural features that created the American carceral state present more substantial difficulties for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system than are widely acknowledged.

    “The structural and cultural features that created the American carceral state present more substantial difficulties for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal legal system than are widely acknowledged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The carceral state goes beyond incarceration rates.

    “The carceral state goes beyond incarceration rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Better integration between carceral state origins and contemporary analyses would advance knowledge considerably, and better connections between various aspects of the carceral state would be useful.

    “Our review suggests that better integration between carceral state origins and contemporary analyses would advance knowledge considerably, and similarly, better connections between various aspects of the carceral state would be useful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Most scholars would agree that the carceral state includes aspects of the criminal legal system such as police contact, arrests, jail and prison incarceration, and supervision through probation and parole.

    “Most scholars would agree that the carceral state includes aspects of the criminal legal system such as police contact, arrests, jail and prison incarceration, and supervision (through probation and parole).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The carceral state is simultaneously highly visible with respect to the criminal legal core and obscured and 'submerged, serpentine' in the form of a shadow carceral state that increases the risk of incarceration.

    “The carceral state is thus simultaneously highly visible with respect to the criminal legal core (policing, courts, and punishment) and obscured and “submerged, serpentine” in the form of a shadow carceral state that increases the risk of incarceration (Beckett and Murakawa 2012, 222).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beckett and Murakawa 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The term 'carceral state' remains ambiguously undefined and a host of potential explanatory factors remain on the table.

    “the term remains ambiguously undefined and a host of potential explanatory factors remain on the table.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Qualitative research is especially valuable for understanding lesser-studied aspects of the carceral state because it allows for rich narrative information, but it does not allow for a national-level accounting of patterns or generalizability.

    “qualitative research is especially valuable for understanding these aspects of the carceral state, since the in-depth and nuanced approach allows for rich narrative information, but this qualitative research does not allow for a national-level accounting of patterns (and an understanding as to whether what occurs in one context is generalizable to other contexts).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Far more people endure other aspects of the carceral state, including other features of the criminal legal system and surveillance from institutions adjacent to the criminal legal system, than endure incarceration.

    “Far more people endure other aspects of the carceral state, including other features of the criminal legal system (for example, police contact, community supervision, legal financial obligations) and surveillance from institutions adjacent to the criminal legal system (for example, schools, child welfare, health care).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Measuring the scope of the carceral state-and especially measuring change over time-requires consistent and accurate historical data.

    “Methodologically, measuring the scope of the carceral state-and especially measuring change over time-requires consistent and accurate historical data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    Doing so dramatically escalates our sense of the challenges involved in rolling back the carceral state and reducing its consequences on American society.

    “Unfortunately, doing so dramatically escalates our sense of the challenges involved in rolling back the carceral state and reducing its consequences on American society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Summary of the Origins of the Carceral State

    The carceral state includes a host of processes and institutions that are often inaccessible to researchers.

    “the carceral state includes a host of processes and institutions that are often inaccessible to researchers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
209 of 209
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field and offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.

    “To the extent that Annual Review articles indicate the degree of interest in a topic within a field, they offer some sense of the landscape of scholarship produced within and across fields.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The criminal legal system is generally conceptualized as being responsive to crime.

    “as the criminal legal system-including incarceration but also policing and supervision via probation and parole-is generally conceptualized as being responsive to crime.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Racial residential segregation diminishes social solidarity.

    “Racial residential segregation diminishes social solidarity, obscures the vastly different role the criminal legal system plays in some lives than in others, and makes it more difficult to reduce high crime and punishment rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Racial residential segregation obscures the vastly different role the criminal legal system plays in some lives than in others.

    “Racial residential segregation diminishes social solidarity, obscures the vastly different role the criminal legal system plays in some lives than in others, and makes it more difficult to reduce high crime and punishment rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Racial residential segregation makes it more difficult to reduce high crime and punishment rates.

    “Racial residential segregation diminishes social solidarity, obscures the vastly different role the criminal legal system plays in some lives than in others, and makes it more difficult to reduce high crime and punishment rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hyperlocal nature of American policing and political processes compounds the problem of racial and ethnic disparities.

    “The hyperlocal nature of American policing and political processes compounds the problem;”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Jail incarceration is the most common and unequally distributed form of incarceration in the United States.

    “jail incarceration is the most common-and unequally distributed-form of incarceration in the United States.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 4 is dated 2021 in the text but 2022 in its caption

    Minor

    The text presents the state imprisonment rates as 2021 figures, while the caption identifies Figure 4, which displays those rates, as showing 2022.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay. Oxford University Press.
  2. Beckett, Katherine. 2018. "The Politics, Prospects, and Perils of Criminal Justice Reform in an Era of Mass Incarceration." Annual Review of Criminol- ogy 1: 235-59.
  3. Blumstein, Alfred, and Richard Rosenfeld. 1998. "Ex- plaining Recent Trends in US Homicide Rates Symposium: Why Is Crime Decreasing." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88(4): 1175- 1216.
  4. Comfort, Megan. 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison.: Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
  5. Enns, Peter K. 2016. Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democ- racy in the World. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Fong, Kelley. 2023. Investigating Families: Mother- hood in the Shadow of Child Protective Services. Princeton University Press.
  7. Kaebel, Danielle. 2021. "Probation and Parole in the United States, 2020." Bureau of Justice Statis- tics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus20 .pdf. · DOI
  8. Mauer, Marc, and Meda Chesney-Lind, eds. 2002. Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Conse- quences of Mass Imprisonment. The New Press.
  9. Mauer, Marc, and Ashley Nellis. 2018. The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences. The New Press.
  10. Messner, Steven F., and Richard Rosenfeld. 2012. Crime and the American Dream. 5th edition.
  11. Murakawa, Naomi. 2014. The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. Studies in Postwar Oxford Univer- sity Press.
  12. National Research Council. 2014. The Growth of In- carceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. The National Acade- mies Press.
  13. Reiter, Keramet. 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement. Yale University Press.
  14. Rios, Victor M. 2017. Human Targets: Schools, Police, and the Criminalization of Latino Youth. Edited by James Diego Vigil. University of Chicago Press.
  15. Zimring, Franklin E. 2010. "The Scale of Imprison- ment in the United States: Twentieth Century Patterns and Twenty-First Century Prospects." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100(3): 1225-46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences
Published
2025-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
136-173
ISSN
  • 2377-8253 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-8261
OpenAlex
W4415351308
Cited by
1
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
carceral state, mass incarceration, criminal justice system, race and racism, political economy of punishment, criminal justice policy, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review