Successor Eponyms, Debt Notes, Intercalation, and the Old Assyrian Calendar during Kültepe Level II: A Critical Reappraisal
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different manuscripts of the eponym list disagree slightly, are imperfectly preserved, and breaks in communication during winter between Aššur and Anatolia introduce a 0-5 year error potential in the REL.
“These include the fact that different manuscripts of the eponym list disagree slightly, and are imperfectly preserved, and that there are breaks in communication during winter between Aššur and Anatolia, all of which allow for varying reconstructions of the sequence and introduce a 0–5 year error potential [5, 8–11].”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
By separating the two fires, the tie between the REL sequence and the astronomical data (eclipses, Venus tablets), intercalations, and potentially the suggested link between a major volcanic dust veil and northern hemisphere tree-ring growth anomalies 1628-1627 BCE and poor atmospheric observation conditions in Mesopotamian records is retained.
“More importantly, by separating the two fires, we retain the tie between the REL sequence and the astronomical data (eclipses, Venus tablets), intercalations [5, 8–11, 15] and even potentially the suggested link between a major volcanic dust veil and several northern hemisphere tree-ring growth anomalies 1628–1627 BCE and poor atmospheric observation conditions as evident in Mesopotamian records [”
From Integrated Tree-Ring-Radiocarbon High-Resolution Timeframe to Resolve Earlier Second Millennium BCE Mesopotamian Chronology (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manning, S. W., Griggs, C. B., Lorentzen, B., Barjamovic, G., Ramsey, C. B., Kromer, B., & Wild, E. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157144 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stratford, E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stratford, Edward
- ORCID
- Stratford, Edward
- Venue
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-324
- ISSN
- 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6978
- OpenAlex
- W2256072469
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- eponyms, intercalation, Old Assyrian period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review