Cited by 1Ancient Near East HistoryEurasian Exchange NetworksHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The Primeval Flood Catastrophe: Origins and Early Development in Mesopotamian Traditions. By Y. S. Chen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 304. $175.00 (cloth).

Open access
Lenzi, Alan·2016·History of Religions

Abstract

This article is a review of The primeval flood catastrophe: origins and early development in Mesopotamian traditions by Chen, Y S. (Yi Samuel). ISBN: 9780199676200. AN: ATLAn3824206

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/684280

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenzi, A.
Affiliations
University of the Pacific (US)
Corresponding author
Lenzi, Alan
Venue
History of Religions
Published
2016-02
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
367-370
ISSN
  • 0018-2710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6935
OpenAlex
W2515919238
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Locations
  • History of Religions (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
comparative mythology, ancient Near Eastern religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review