Cited by 212Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Credit Access and College Enrollment

Solis, Alex·2017·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

Does access to credit explain the gap in schooling attainment between children from richer and poorer families? I present new evidence on this important question based on the causal effects of two college loan programs in Chile that are available to students scoring above a threshold on the national college admission test, enabling a regression discontinuity design. I find that credit access leads to a 100 percent increase in immediate college enrollment and a 50 percent increase in the probability of ever enrolling. Moreover, access to loans effectively eliminates the income gap in enrollment and number of years of college attainment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/690829

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Chilean student loan program virtually eliminates the income gradient in college enrollment for students above the cutoff.

    “Examining college applicants around the test score cutoff, Solis (2017) finds that college enrollment is 16 percentage points higher for college applicants who just barely qualify for loans (from a baseline college enrollment rate around 30 percent); he also finds that the program virtually eliminates the income gradient in college enrollment for students above the cutoff.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Solis (2017)

  • In Chile, college enrollment is 16 percentage points higher for college applicants who just barely qualify for loans (from a baseline college enrollment rate around 30 percent).

    “Examining college applicants around the test score cutoff, Solis (2017) finds that college enrollment is 16 percentage points higher for college applicants who just barely qualify for loans (from a baseline college enrollment rate around 30 percent); he also finds that the program virtually eliminates the income gradient in college enrollment for students above the cutoff.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Solis (2017)

  • There is some direct evidence that aid can narrow socioeconomic gaps in enrollment.

    “there is some direct evidence that aid can narrow socioeconomic gaps in enrollment (e.g.Solis, 2017).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Solis, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solis, A.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2017-04
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
562-622
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W93284228
Cited by
212
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
84.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
access to credit, college enrollment, student loans, educational attainment, household income, college entrance examination, Chile, regression discontinuity design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review