Integrating identities: an innovative bioarchaeological and biogeochemical approach to analyzing the multiplicity of identities in the mortuary record
Abstract
Despite our instinctive understanding of the importance of “identity,” archaeologists and bioarchaeologists continue to struggle to rigorously investigate this complex phenomenon. Here, we present a contextualized multiscalar bioarchaeological approach to studying identities in the past—individual and group, mutable and immutable—through the mortuary record. We argue that, while many scholars have moved beyond the single-focus study, archaeological individuals themselves are still neglected. A contextualized bioarchaeological approach brings together a variety of methods to investigate aspects of individual and group identities, provides a means of accessing biological facets of identity, and allows for more nuanced understanding of the complexities of social identities. We illustrate the utility of our model with a case study using archaeological, bioarchaeological, and biogeochemical data from northern Chile, stressing both the fixed and the dynamic aspects of different identities. We focus on the tumultuous transition between the Middle Horizon (AD 500–1100) and Late Intermediate Period (AD 1100–1400) in northern Chile’s San Pedro de Atacama oases and the neighboring upper Loa River Valley. Our research demonstrates a shift toward homogenizing representations of social identities as well as biological aspects of identities as societies began reformulating their social groups following the end of the complex and cosmopolitan Middle Horizon.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The author's work led to a model for an integrative and contextualized view of identity in the Chilean Atacama that goes beyond solely cranial modification to consider the body and the grave in myriad ways.
“In my work, this ultimately lead to the presentation of a model for an integrative and contextualized view of identity in the Chilean Atacama that goes beyond solely cranial modification to consider the body and the grave in myriad ways (Torres-Rouff and Knudson, 2017).”
From Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes (2020) · cites this paper as Torres-Rouff and Knudson, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 148 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Torres-Rouff, C., & Knudson, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- ORCID
- Knudson, Kelly J.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-409
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2609832658
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0721388, 0721229)
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection
- Arizona State University
- Colorado College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- identity, morgue records, social identity, personal identity, Middle Horizon, Late Intermediate Period, northern Chile, biogeochemistry, bioarchaeology, social homogenization, pre-Hispanic societies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review