Cited by 91

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fish, Kin and Hope: Tending to Water Violations in amiskwaciwâskahikan and Treaty Six Territory

Todd, Zoe·2017·Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry

Abstract

Previous articleNext article FreeFish, Kin and Hope: Tending to Water Violations in amiskwaciwâskahikan and Treaty Six TerritoryZoe ToddZoe ToddPDFPDF PLUSAbstractFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreAbstractIn the aftermath of an oil spill in the North Saskatchewan River, Zoe Todd urges a rethink of human and more-than-human relations.Plastiglomerate sample/ready-made, collected by Patricia Corcoran and sculptor Kelly Jazvac at Kamilo Beach, Hawaii, 2013. Photograph: Jeff Elstone. Courtesy Kelly JazvacWe as humans live in a very narrow spectrum of ideal conditions. Those ideal conditions have to be there for us to exist. That's why it's very important to talk about ecology, the relationship. If those ideal conditions are not there, you and I are not going to last for very long. Just text Neanderthal. Ask the dinosaurs. What happened to them? We asked one of our elders, 'Why did those dinosaurs disappear?' He thought about it for a while and he said, 'Maybe they didn't do their ceremonies.'– Leroy Little Bear1On 21 July 2016, Husky Energy Inc. spilled around 200,000 litres of oil mixed with diluents into the North Saskatchewan River, near the Saskatchewan-Alberta border.2 The oil spill breached the containment booms that had been built in the river, and flowed past cities and First Nations lands downstream of the leak. The cities of Prince Albert and North Battleford and th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/692559

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bear Leroy Little, 2016, Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences
  2. Tait Carrie, 2016, The Globe and Mail
  3. McSheffrey Elizabeth, 2016, National Observer
  4. Camp Richard Van, 2014, an interview with Shelagh Rogers on The Next Chapter on
  5. Heaven Godless But, 2012, which is also printed in the anthology
  6. North Dead, 2013, On the Wings of this Prayer
  7. Davis Heather, The Queer Futurity of Plastic', lecture at the Sonic Acts Academy
  8. 10.7202/1028861ar · DOI
  9. Canada' Indigenous, 2016, Somatosphere: Ethnographic Case Series
  10. Napoleon Val, 2007, Thinking About Indigenous Legal Orders', research paper for the National Centre for First Nations Governance
  11. 10.14318/hau4.1.017 · DOI
  12. TallBear Kim, 2013, Beyond Life/Not Life', lecture at UCLA Center for the Study of Women
  13. 2016, Early Oil Sands History and Development

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Todd, Z.
Venue
Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry
Published
2017-03
Volume
43
Pages
102-107
ISSN
  • 1465-4253
  • 2156-4914
Cited by
91
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review