Price-Responsive Allowance Supply in Emissions Markets
Abstract
Environmental policy with uncertainty is often posed as a choice between price and quantity instruments. Adding flexibility to fixed policy instruments can improve outcomes. Roberts and Spence noted the efficiency advantages of matching emissions allowances supply to the marginal damage schedule. We propose an implementable approach to making that match, an approach we call “price-responsive supply,” which treats prices and quantities as simultaneously determined in the allowance auction. For competitive environments, price-responsive supply outperforms fixed-price and fixed-quantity instruments. Price-responsive supply can enhance the performance of real-world regulatory environments through an automatic adjustment mechanism that responds instantaneously to new information about abatement costs. We demonstrate the improved performance of price-responsive supply in experiments and simulations. A price-responsive supply schedule, while offering efficiency advantages, also translates the cost-lowering effects of other, coincident policies into accelerated reductions under an emissions cap, thereby helping to resolve the waterbed effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Price-based collars as used in US allowance markets do not suffer from the downward-sloping supply curve shortcoming.
“Price-based collars as used in US allowance markets (Burtraw et al. 2022, MacKenzie 2022) do not suffer from this shortcoming”
From The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review (2023) · cites this paper as Burtraw et al. 2022
Cites
New EU ETS Phase 4 rules temporarily puncture waterbed
Perino, G. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0120-2 · Cited by 192 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The waterbed effect refers to the rebound from efforts to reduce emissions at one location that results in an increase in emissions at another location when total emissions are capped (Perino 2018).”
BackgroundHolt, C. A., & Shobe, W. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.01.003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Evolution of Pollution Auctions
MacKenzie, I. A. (2022) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1086/717898 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rushing the Impatient: Allowance Reserves and the Time Profile of Low-Carbon Investments
Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2019) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00350-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review
Borghesi, S., Pahle, M., Perino, G., Quemin, S., & Willner, M. (2023) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-030145 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burtraw, D., Holt, C., Palmer, K., & Shobe, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 851-884
- ISSN
- 2333-5955 (ISSN-L)
- 2333-5963
- OpenAlex
- W4280613958
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- emissions trading, abatement costs, waterbed effect, emission caps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review