Cited by 59Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Functional Morphology and Fluid Interactions During Early Development of the Scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita

Feitl, K. E., Millett, A.F., Colin, S. P., Dabiri, J. O., Costello, J. H.·2009·The Biological Bulletin

Abstract

Scyphomedusae undergo a predictable ontogenetic transition from a conserved, universal larval form to a diverse array of adult morphologies. This transition entails a change in bell morphology from a highly discontinuous ephyral form, with deep clefts separating eight discrete lappets, to a continuous solid umbrella-like adult form. We used a combination of kinematic, modeling, and flow visualization techniques to examine the function of the medusan bell throughout the developmental changes of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita. We found that flow around swimming ephyrae and their lappets was relatively viscous (1 < Re < 10) and, as a result, ephyral lappets were surrounded by thick, overlapping boundary layers that occluded flow through the gaps between lappets. As medusae grew, their fluid environment became increasingly influenced by inertial forces (10 < Re < 10,000) and, simultaneously, clefts between the lappets were replaced by organic tissue. Hence, although the bell undergoes a structural transition from discontinuous (lappets with gaps) to continuous (solid bell) surfaces during development, all developmental stages maintain functionally continuous paddling surfaces. This developmental pattern enables ephyrae to efficiently allocate tissue to bell diameter increase via lappet growth, while minimizing tissue allocation to inter-lappet spaces that maintain paddle function due to boundary layer overlap.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/bblv217n3p283

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feitl, K. E., Millett, A. F., Colin, S. P., Dabiri, J. O., & Costello, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Providence College (US)
  • Roger Williams University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Biological Bulletin
Published
2009-12
Volume
217
Issue
3
Pages
283-291
ISSN
  • 0006-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8697
OpenAlex
W2134493558
Cited by
59
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Keywords
Aurelia aurita, scyphomedusae, ephyrae, lappets, functional morphology, fluid-structure interaction, boundary layer, viscous flow, inertial flow, swimming kinematics, flow visualization
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Structures, Scyphozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review